Literature DB >> 17711470

Maternal body size as an evolutionary constraint on egg size in a butterfly.

Stephanie S Bauerfeind1, Klaus Fischer.   

Abstract

Genetic and developmental constraints have often been invoked to explain patterns of existing morphologies. Yet, empirical tests addressing this issue directly are still scarce. We here set out to investigate the importance of maternal body size as an evolutionary constraint on egg size in the tropical butterfly Bicyclus anynana, employing an artificial two-trait selection experiment on simultaneous changes in body and egg size (synergistic and antagonistic selection). Selection on maternal body size and egg size was successful in both the synergistic and the antagonistic selection direction. Yet, responses to selection and realized heritabilities varied across selection regimes: the most extreme values for pupal mass were found in the synergistic selection directions, whereas in the antagonistic selection direction realized heritabilities were low and nonsignificant in three of four cases. In contrast, for egg size the highest values were obtained in the lines selected for low pupal mass. Thus, selection on body size yielded a stronger correlated response in egg size than vice versa, which is likely to bias (i.e., constrain), if weakly, evolutionary change in body size. However, it seems questionable whether this will prevent evolution toward novel phenotypes, given enough time and that natural selection is strong. Correlated responses to selection were overall weak. Egg and larval development times tended to be associated with changes in maternal size, whereas variation in pupal development times weakly tended to follow variation in egg size. Lifetime fecundity was similar across selection regimes, except for females simultaneously selected for large body mass and small egg size, exhibiting increased fecundity. Multiple regressions showed that lifetime fecundity and concomitantly reproductive investment were primarily determined by longevity, as expected for an income breeder, whereas egg size was primarily determined by pupal mass. Evidence for a phenotypic trade-off between egg size and number was weak.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17711470     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00197.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  4 in total

1.  Recurrent violations of invariant rules for offspring size: evidence from turtles and the implications for small clutch size models.

Authors:  Njal Rollinson; Christopher B Edge; Ronald J Brooks
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Adult nutrition and butterfly fitness: effects of diet quality on reproductive output, egg composition, and egg hatching success.

Authors:  Thorin L Geister; Matthias W Lorenz; Klaus H Hoffmann; Klaus Fischer
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 3.172

3.  Young male mating success is associated with sperm number but not with male sex pheromone titres.

Authors:  Tobias Kehl; Ian A N Dublon; Klaus Fischer
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 3.172

4.  Intra- and trans-generational costs of reduced female body size caused by food limitation early in life in mites.

Authors:  Andreas Walzer; Peter Schausberger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.