Literature DB >> 17711464

Interaction between parental care and sibling competition: parents enhance offspring growth and exacerbate sibling competition.

Per T Smiseth1, Laura Lennox, Allen J Moore.   

Abstract

Species with elaborate parental care often also show intense sibling competition over resources provided by parents, suggesting joint evolution of these two traits. Despite this, the evolution of elaborate parental care and the evolution of intense sibling competition are often studied separately. Here, we examine the interaction between parental food provisioning and sibling competition for resources through the joint manipulation of the presence or absence of parents and brood size in a species with facultative parental care: the burying beetle Nicrophorus vespilloides. The effect of the interaction between the presence or absence of parents and brood size was strong; brood size had a strong effect on growth when parents provided care, but no effect when parents were absent. As in previous studies, offspring grew faster when parents were present than when parents were absent, and offspring grew faster in smaller broods than in larger broods. Our behavioral observations showed that brood size had a negative effect on both the amount of time parents spent providing resources to individual offspring and the offspring's effectiveness of begging, confirming that the level of sibling competition increased with brood size. Furthermore, offspring in larger broods shifted more from begging toward self-feeding as they grew older compared to offspring in small broods. Our study provides novel insights into the joint evolution of parental care and sibling competition, and the evolution of offspring begging signals. We discuss the implications of our results in light of recent theoretical work on the evolution of parental care, sibling competition, and offspring begging signals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17711464     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00192.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  24 in total

1.  The influence of maternal effects on indirect benefits associated with polyandry.

Authors:  Clarissa M House; Bronwyn H Bleakley; Craig A Walling; Thomas A R Price; Clare E Stamper; Allen J Moore
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  When it is costly to have a caring mother: food limitation erases the benefits of parental care in earwigs.

Authors:  Joël Meunier; Mathias Kölliker
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Antimicrobial strategies in burying beetles breeding on carrion.

Authors:  D E Rozen; D J P Engelmoer; P T Smiseth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Biparental care is more than the sum of its parts: experimental evidence for synergistic effects on offspring fitness.

Authors:  Natalie Pilakouta; Elizabeth J H Hanlon; Per T Smiseth
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Are species differences in maternal effects arising from maternal care adaptive?

Authors:  K M Benowitz; K J Moody; A J Moore
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 2.411

6.  Within-female plasticity in sex allocation is associated with a behavioural polyphenism in house wrens.

Authors:  E K Bowers; C F Thompson; S K Sakaluk
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 2.411

7.  Condition-Dependent Begging Elicits Increased Parental Investment in a Wild Bird Population.

Authors:  E Keith Bowers; Jonathan B Jenkins; Alexander J Mueller; Kelly D Miller; Charles F Thompson; Scott K Sakaluk
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  Life history and the evolutionary loss of parental care.

Authors:  Isimeme N Udu; Michael B Bonsall; Hope Klug
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 5.530

9.  Parental care masks a density-dependent shift from cooperation to competition among burying beetle larvae.

Authors:  Matthew Schrader; Benjamin J M Jarrett; Rebecca M Kilner
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Middleborns disadvantaged? Testing birth-order effects on fitness in pre-industrial Finns.

Authors:  Charlotte Faurie; Andrew F Russell; Virpi Lummaa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-05-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.