Literature DB >> 17711357

Comparison of Internet-based and paper-based questionnaires in Taiwan using multisample invariance approach.

Sen-Chi Yu1, Min-Ning Yu.   

Abstract

This study examines whether the Internet-based questionnaire is psychometrically equivalent to the paper-based questionnaire. A random sample of 2,400 teachers in Taiwan was divided into experimental and control groups. The experimental group was invited to complete the electronic form of the Chinese version of Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) placed on the Internet, whereas the control group was invited to complete the paper-based CES-D, which they received by mail. The multisample invariance approach, derived from structural equation modeling (SEM), was applied to analyze the collected data. The analytical results show that the two groups have equivalent factor structures in the CES-D. That is, the items in CES-D function equivalently in the two groups. Then the equality of latent mean test was performed. The latent means of "depressed mood," "positive affect," and "interpersonal problems" in CES-D are not significantly different between these two groups. However, the difference in the "somatic symptoms" latent means between these two groups is statistically significant at alpha = 0.01. But the Cohen's d statistics indicates that such differences in latent means do not apparently lead to a meaningful effect size in practice. Both CES-D questionnaires exhibit equal validity, reliability, and factor structures and exhibit a little difference in latent means. Therefore, the Internet-based questionnaire represents a promising alternative to the paper-based questionnaire.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17711357     DOI: 10.1089/cpb.2007.9998

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cyberpsychol Behav        ISSN: 1094-9313


  9 in total

Review 1.  Mode of administration does not cause bias in patient-reported outcome results: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Claudia Rutherford; Daniel Costa; Rebecca Mercieca-Bebber; Holly Rice; Liam Gabb; Madeleine King
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Difference in method of administration did not significantly impact item response: an IRT-based analysis from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) initiative.

Authors:  Jakob B Bjorner; Matthias Rose; Barbara Gandek; Arthur A Stone; Doerte U Junghaenel; John E Ware
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Method of administration of PROMIS scales did not significantly impact score level, reliability, or validity.

Authors:  Jakob B Bjorner; Matthias Rose; Barbara Gandek; Arthur A Stone; Doerte U Junghaenel; John E Ware
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Interformat Reliability of Web-Based Parent-Rated Questionnaires for Assessing Neurodevelopmental Disorders Among Preschoolers: Cross-sectional Community Study.

Authors:  Masanori Tanaka; Manabu Saito; Michio Takahashi; Masaki Adachi; Kazuhiko Nakamura
Journal:  JMIR Pediatr Parent       Date:  2021-02-04

5.  The influence of response mode on study results: offering cigarette smokers a choice of postal or online completion of a survey.

Authors:  Peter W Callas; Laura J Solomon; John R Hughes; Amy E Livingston
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 6.  Interformat reliability of digital psychiatric self-report questionnaires: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sven Alfonsson; Pernilla Maathz; Timo Hursti
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 7.  Validation of online psychometric instruments for common mental health disorders: a systematic review.

Authors:  Wouter van Ballegooijen; Heleen Riper; Pim Cuijpers; Patricia van Oppen; Johannes H Smit
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 3.630

8.  Using Social Network Sites to Boost Savoring: Positive Effects on Positive Emotions.

Authors:  Sen-Chi Yu; Kennon M Sheldon; Wen-Ping Lan; Jia-Huei Chen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 9.  Equivalence of electronic and paper administration of patient-reported outcome measures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies conducted between 2007 and 2013.

Authors:  Willie Muehlhausen; Helen Doll; Nuz Quadri; Bethany Fordham; Paul O'Donohoe; Nijda Dogar; Diane J Wild
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 3.186

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.