Literature DB >> 17710740

Sequential design approaches for bioequivalence studies with crossover designs.

Diane Potvin1, Charles E DiLiberti, Walter W Hauck, Alan F Parr, Donald J Schuirmann, Robert A Smith.   

Abstract

The planning of bioequivalence (BE) studies, as for any clinical trial, requires a priori specification of an effect size for the determination of power and an assumption about the variance. The specified effect size may be overly optimistic, leading to an underpowered study. The assumed variance can be either too small or too large, leading, respectively, to studies that are underpowered or overly large. There has been much work in the clinical trials field on various types of sequential designs that include sample size reestimation after the trial is started, but these have seen only little use in BE studies. The purpose of this work was to validate at least one such method for crossover design BE studies. Specifically, we considered sample size reestimation for a two-stage trial based on the variance estimated from the first stage. We identified two methods based on Pocock's method for group sequential trials that met our requirement for at most negligible increase in type I error rate. (c) 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17710740     DOI: 10.1002/pst.294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharm Stat        ISSN: 1539-1604            Impact factor:   1.894


  19 in total

Review 1.  International guidelines for bioequivalence of systemically available orally administered generic drug products: a survey of similarities and differences.

Authors:  Barbara Davit; April C Braddy; Dale P Conner; Lawrence X Yu
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 4.009

2.  Futility rules in bioequivalence trials with sequential designs.

Authors:  Anders Fuglsang
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 4.009

3.  Harmonization of regulatory approaches for evaluating therapeutic equivalence and interchangeability of multisource drug products: workshop summary report.

Authors:  Mei-Ling Chen; Vinod P Shah; Daan J Crommelin; Leon Shargel; Dennis Bashaw; Masood Bhatti; Henning Blume; Jennifer Dressman; Murray Ducharme; Paul Fackler; Terry Hyslop; Lorelei Lutter; Jose Morais; Eric Ormsby; Saji Thomas; Yu Chung Tsang; Raja Velagapudi; Lawrence X Yu
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 4.  Two-stage designs in bioequivalence trials.

Authors:  Helmut Schütz
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Pilot and Repeat Trials as Development Tools Associated with Demonstration of Bioequivalence.

Authors:  Anders Fuglsang
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 4.009

6.  An insight into the properties of a two-stage design in bioequivalence studies.

Authors:  Vangelis Karalis; Panos Macheras
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 4.200

7.  Sequential bioequivalence trial designs with increased power and controlled type I error rates.

Authors:  Anders Fuglsang
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2013-03-30       Impact factor: 4.009

8.  Sequential bioequivalence approaches for parallel designs.

Authors:  Anders Fuglsang
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 4.009

9.  A sequential bioequivalence design with a potential ethical advantage.

Authors:  Anders Fuglsang
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 4.009

10.  Design and inference for 3-stage bioequivalence testing with serial sampling data.

Authors:  Fangrong Yan; Huihong Zhu; Junlin Liu; Liyun Jiang; Xuelin Huang
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 1.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.