Literature DB >> 17710048

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy as solo surgery with the aid of a robotic camera holder: a case-control study.

Manfred Kalteis1, Renate Pistrich, Wolfgang Schimetta, Werner Pölz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: By using robotic camera holders, a laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is possible as a solo-surgeon operation. The purpose of this paper is to examine the safeness and efficiency of solo-surgeon LCs.
METHODS: A series of 72 solo-surgeon LCs was retrospectively compared with a control cohort (matched pairs). Efficiency and safety parameters were compared by means of equivalence tests (scope=10%).
RESULTS: Nearly identical incision-suture times (means: 69.6 vs. 70.7 min) were recorded. An equivalence was also found in the cohorts for the total time in the operating room (means: 117.4 vs. 117.2 min). In terms of the rate of complications, the perioperative difference in hemoglobin, and the conversion rate, the robot cohort proved to be at least equal to the control cohort. The postoperative hospital stay was shorter for the robot cohort.
CONCLUSION: Solo-surgeon LC with a robotic camera holder is an efficient and safe method.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17710048     DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31806030ae

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech        ISSN: 1530-4515            Impact factor:   1.719


  9 in total

1.  Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Caiwen Han; Xinyi Shan; Liang Yao; Peijing Yan; Meixuan Li; Lidong Hu; Hongwei Tian; Wutang Jing; Binbin Du; Lixia Wang; Kehu Yang; Tiankang Guo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Technical and instrumental prerequisites for single-port laparoscopic solo surgery: state of art.

Authors:  Say-June Kim; Sang Chul Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  The feasibility of solo-surgeon living donor nephrectomy: initial experience using video-assisted minilaparotomy surgery.

Authors:  Yong Seung Lee; Hwang Gyun Jeon; Seung Ryeol Lee; Woo Ju Jeong; Seung Choul Yang; Woong Kyu Han
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-04-10       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  First experience with THE AUTOLAP™ SYSTEM: an image-based robotic camera steering device.

Authors:  Paul J M Wijsman; Ivo A M J Broeders; Hylke J Brenkman; Amir Szold; Antonello Forgione; Henk W R Schreuder; Esther C J Consten; Werner A Draaisma; Paul M Verheijen; Jelle P Ruurda; Yuval Kaufman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Robotic operations in urgent general surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alexander Reinisch; Juliane Liese; Winfried Padberg; Frank Ulrich
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2022-06-21

6.  No relevant difference in quality of life and functional outcome at 12 months' follow-up-a randomised controlled trial comparing robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.

Authors:  B P Müller-Stich; M A Reiter; A Mehrabi; M N Wente; L Fischer; J Köninger; C N Gutt
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Efficiency in image-guided robotic and conventional camera steering: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  P J M Wijsman; F J Voskens; L Molenaar; C D P van 't Hullenaar; E C J Consten; W A Draaisma; I A M J Broeders
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Innovation in robotic surgery: the Indian scenario.

Authors:  Suresh V Deshpande
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.407

9.  Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with Mirizzi syndrome.

Authors:  Won-Bae Chang; Ho-Seong Han; Yoo-Seok Yoon; Jai Young Cho; YoungRok Choi
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 1.859

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.