Literature DB >> 17709780

Direct and indirect selection of visceral lipid weight, fillet weight, and fillet percentage in a rainbow trout breeding program.

A Kause1, T Paananen, O Ritola, H Koskinen.   

Abstract

We assessed whether visceral lipid weight, fillet weight, and percentage fillet from BW, 3 traits laborious to record, could be genetically improved by indirect selection on more easily measured traits in farmed rainbow trout. Visceral lipid is discarded as waste during slaughter, influencing production efficiency and production costs. Fillet weight and fillet percentage directly influence economic returns in trout production. The study comprised 3 steps. First, we assessed the degree to which selection on percentage of visceral weight from BW indirectly changes visceral lipid weight and the size of intestines and internal organs. The phenotypic analysis of weights of viscera, intestines, visceral lipid, liver, and gonads measured from 40 fish revealed that phenotypic selection against visceral weight was most strongly directed to visceral lipid, and to a lesser degree to intestines and gonads. Because genetic relationships among these traits were not established, it is not known whether indirect selection leads to genetic responses. Second, we examined whether direct selection for the fillet traits could be replaced by indirect selection on BW, eviscerated BW, visceral weight, visceral percentage, head volume, and relative head volume (head volume relative to BW). The selection index calculations based on the quantitative genetic parameters obtained from multigenerational pedigree data showed that genetic improvement of fillet percentage through direct selection (selection accuracy, r(TI) = 0.54) was equally efficient compared with indirect selection on visceral percentage ( r(TI) = 0.54). Genetic improvement of fillet weight through direct selection (r(TI) = 0.56) was always more efficient than indirect selection, yet indirect selection for eviscerated BW ( r(TI) = 0.50) was almost as efficient as direct selection. Third, the expected genetic responses to alternative selection indices showed that improved fillet percentage was mainly a result of a moderate decrease in visceral weight rather than of a major increase in absolute fillet weight. Moreover, fillet percentage is challenging to improve, even if it exhibits moderate heritability (h(2) = 0.29). This is because fillet percentage displays low phenotypic variation. In conclusion, fillet weight and fillet percentage can be increased by indirect selection against visceral percentage and for high eviscerated BW.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17709780     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2007-0332

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  13 in total

1.  Quantitative trait loci affecting response to crowding stress in an F(2) generation of rainbow trout produced through phenotypic selection.

Authors:  Caird E Rexroad; Roger L Vallejo; Sixin Liu; Yniv Palti; Gregory M Weber
Journal:  Mar Biotechnol (NY)       Date:  2013-05-25       Impact factor: 3.619

2.  Growth-related quantitative trait loci in domestic and wild rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss).

Authors:  Brendan F Wringe; Robert H Devlin; Moira M Ferguson; Hooman K Moghadam; Dionne Sakhrani; Roy G Danzmann
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 2.797

3.  Untangling the positive genetic correlation between rainbow trout growth and survival.

Authors:  Harri Vehviläinen; Antti Kause; Hanna Kuukka-Anttila; Heikki Koskinen; Tuija Paananen
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 5.183

4.  Differential gene expression in small and large rainbow trout derived from two seasonal spawning groups.

Authors:  Andrea L Kocmarek; Moira M Ferguson; Roy G Danzmann
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  Genome-Wide Association Study for Identifying Loci that Affect Fillet Yield, Carcass, and Body Weight Traits in Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss).

Authors:  Dianelys Gonzalez-Pena; Guangtu Gao; Matthew Baranski; Thomas Moen; Beth M Cleveland; P Brett Kenney; Roger L Vallejo; Yniv Palti; Timothy D Leeds
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 4.599

6.  Phenotyping for Genetic Improvement of Feed Efficiency in Fish: Lessons From Pig Breeding.

Authors:  Pieter W Knap; Antti Kause
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 4.599

7.  First Evidence of Realized Selection Response on Fillet Yield in Rainbow Trout Oncorhynchus mykiss, Using Sib Selection or Based on Correlated Ultrasound Measurements.

Authors:  Marc Vandeputte; Jérôme Bugeon; Anastasia Bestin; Alexandre Desgranges; Jean-Michel Allamellou; Anne-Sophie Tyran; François Allal; Mathilde Dupont-Nivet; Pierrick Haffray
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 4.599

8.  The genetics of overwintering performance in two-year old common carp and its relation to performance until market size.

Authors:  Martin Prchal; Antti Kause; Marc Vandeputte; David Gela; Jean-Michel Allamellou; Girish Kumar; Anastasia Bestin; Jérôme Bugeon; Jinfeng Zhao; Martin Kocour
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Integrated analysis of lncRNA and mRNA expression in rainbow trout families showing variation in muscle growth and fillet quality traits.

Authors:  Ali Ali; Rafet Al-Tobasei; Brett Kenney; Timothy D Leeds; Mohamed Salem
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Potential for Genetic Improvement of the Main Slaughter Yields in Common Carp With in vivo Morphological Predictors.

Authors:  Martin Prchal; Jérôme Bugeon; Marc Vandeputte; Antti Kause; Alain Vergnet; Jinfeng Zhao; David Gela; Lucie Genestout; Anastasia Bestin; Pierrick Haffray; Martin Kocour
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 4.599

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.