Literature DB >> 17709324

The effects of adulterants and selected ingested compounds on drugs-of-abuse testing in urine.

Amitava Dasgupta1.   

Abstract

Household chemicals such as bleach, table salt, laundry detergent, toilet bowl cleaner, vinegar, lemon juice, and eyedrops are used for adulterating urine specimens. Most of these adulterants except eyedrops can be detected by routine specimen integrity tests (creatinine, pH, temperature, and specific gravity); however, certain adulterants such as Klear, Whizzies, Urine Luck, and Stealth cannot. These adulterants can successfully mask drug testing if the concentrations of certain abused drugs are moderate. Several spot tests have been described to detect the presence of such adulterants in urine. Urine dipsticks are commercially available for detecting the presence of such adulterants, along with performance of tests for creatinine, pH, and specific gravity. Certain hair shampoo and saliva-cleaning mouthwashes are available to escape detection in hair or saliva samples, but the effectiveness of such products in masking drugs-of-abuse testing has not been demonstrated. Ingestion of poppy seed cake may result in positive screening test results for opiates, and hemp oil exposure can cause positive results for marijuana. These would be identified as true-positive results in drugs-of-abuse testing even though they do not represent the actual drug of abuse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17709324     DOI: 10.1309/FQY06F8XKTQPM149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9173            Impact factor:   2.493


  5 in total

1.  A case of psychosis after use of a detoxification kit and a review of techniques, risks, and regulations associated with the subversion of urine drug tests.

Authors:  Moneeshindra Singh Mittal; Rachna Kalia; Ahsan Y Khan
Journal:  Prim Care Companion CNS Disord       Date:  2011

Review 2.  Narrative review: buprenorphine for opioid-dependent patients in office practice.

Authors:  Lynn E Sullivan; David A Fiellin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Effect of urine adulterants on commercial drug abuse screening test strip results.

Authors:  Ivana Rajšić; Dragana Javorac; Simona Tatović; Aleksandra Repić; Danijela Đukić-Ćosić; Snežana Đorđević; Vera Lukić; Zorica Bulat
Journal:  Arh Hig Rada Toksikol       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 1.948

4.  Comparison of liquid-liquid extraction-thin layer chromatography with solid-phase extraction-high-performance thin layer chromatography in detection of urinary morphine.

Authors:  Ali Ahadi; Alireza Partoazar; Mohammad-Hassan Abedi-Khorasgani; Seyed Vahid Shetab-Boushehri
Journal:  J Biomed Res       Date:  2011-09

5.  Urine specimen validity test for drug abuse testing in workplace and court settings.

Authors:  Shin-Yu Lin; Hei-Hwa Lee; Jong-Feng Lee; Bai-Hsiun Chen
Journal:  J Food Drug Anal       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 6.157

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.