Literature DB >> 17709262

Interrelationships of the 11 gasterosteiform families (sticklebacks, pipefishes, and their relatives): a new perspective based on whole mitogenome sequences from 75 higher teleosts.

Ryouka Kawahara1, Masaki Miya, Kohji Mabuchi, Sébastien Lavoué, Jun G Inoue, Takashi P Satoh, Akira Kawaguchi, Mutsumi Nishida.   

Abstract

The fishes currently recognized as members of the order Gasterosteiformes (sticklebacks, pipefishes, and their relatives) number 278 species, classified into two suborders (Gasterosteoidei and Syngnathoidei), 11 families and 71 genera. Members of this group exhibit unique appearances, many of which are derived from armored bodies with bony plates in various forms. Although recent molecular phylogenetic studies have repeatedly questioned the monophyly of this order, none of the studies examined all of the representative families and the phylogenetic reality of the group has remained unclear. In this study, we examined whole mitochondrial genome (mitogenome) sequences from 13 gasterosteiform species representing all 11 families in the order, and subjected them to partitioned maximum likelihood and Bayesian analyses, with additional data from other percomorphs and outgroups (75 mitogenome sequences considered overall, including 10 newly determined). The resultant phylogenies indicated explicitly that previously recognized members of Gasterosteiformes had diverged basally within the Percomorpha into three different clades with the following subgroups: Syngnathoidei, Gasterosteoidei (minus Indostomidae), and Indostomidae. Monophyly of the order Gasterosteiformes and any combinations of the three subgroups were confidently rejected by statistical tests. Syngnathoidei (together with Dactylopteroidei) formed a monophyletic group, a sister-group relationship between Gasterosteoidei (minus Indostomidae) and Zoarcoidei was reconfirmed and Indostomidae was nested within the Synbranchiformes, rendering the latter group paraphyletic. Our study demonstrates a new perspective of gasterosteiform phylogeny, which will provide fundamental information for future studies of phylogeny, systematics, and evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17709262     DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2007.07.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol        ISSN: 1055-7903            Impact factor:   4.286


  26 in total

1.  A long-bodied centriscoid fish from the basal Eocene of Kabardino-Balkaria, northern Caucasus, Russia.

Authors:  Alexandre F Bannikov; Giorgio Carnevale
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2012-04-17

2.  Evolution of gene function and regulatory control after whole-genome duplication: comparative analyses in vertebrates.

Authors:  Karin S Kassahn; Vinh T Dang; Simon J Wilkins; Andrew C Perkins; Mark A Ragan
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Phylogeny and tempo of diversification in the superradiation of spiny-rayed fishes.

Authors:  Thomas J Near; Alex Dornburg; Ron I Eytan; Benjamin P Keck; W Leo Smith; Kristen L Kuhn; Jon A Moore; Samantha A Price; Frank T Burbrink; Matt Friedman; Peter C Wainwright
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The genomics of incompatibility factors and sex determination in hybridizing species of Cottus (Pisces).

Authors:  J Cheng; T Czypionka; A W Nolte
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  Absence of major histocompatibility complex class II mediated immunity in pipefish, Syngnathus typhle: evidence from deep transcriptome sequencing.

Authors:  David Haase; Olivia Roth; Martin Kalbe; Gisela Schmiedeskamp; Jörn P Scharsack; Philip Rosenstiel; Thorsten B H Reusch
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Diversity of bile salts in fish and amphibians: evolution of a complex biochemical pathway.

Authors:  Lee R Hagey; Peter R Møller; Alan F Hofmann; Matthew D Krasowski
Journal:  Physiol Biochem Zool       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.247

7.  Automated Integration of Trees and Traits: A Case Study Using Paired Fin Loss Across Teleost Fishes.

Authors:  Laura M Jackson; Pasan C Fernando; Josh S Hanscom; James P Balhoff; Paula M Mabee
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 15.683

8.  Major biliary bile acids of the medaka (Oryzias latipes): 25R- and 25S-epimers of 3alpha,7alpha,12alpha-trihydroxy-5beta-cholestanoic acid.

Authors:  Lee R Hagey; Takashi Lida; Hideyuki Tamegai; Shoujiro Ogawa; Mizuho Une; Kiyoshi Asahina; Kumiko Mushiake; Takaaki Goto; Nariyasu Mano; Junichi Goto; Matthew D Krasowski; Alan F Hofmann
Journal:  Zoolog Sci       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 0.931

9.  Evolutionary history of anglerfishes (Teleostei: Lophiiformes): a mitogenomic perspective.

Authors:  Masaki Miya; Theodore W Pietsch; James W Orr; Rachel J Arnold; Takashi P Satoh; Andrew M Shedlock; Hsuan-Ching Ho; Mitsuomi Shimazaki; Mamoru Yabe; Mutsumi Nishida
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  The tree of life and a new classification of bony fishes.

Authors:  Ricardo Betancur-R; Richard E Broughton; Edward O Wiley; Kent Carpenter; J Andrés López; Chenhong Li; Nancy I Holcroft; Dahiana Arcila; Millicent Sanciangco; James C Cureton Ii; Feifei Zhang; Thaddaeus Buser; Matthew A Campbell; Jesus A Ballesteros; Adela Roa-Varon; Stuart Willis; W Calvin Borden; Thaine Rowley; Paulette C Reneau; Daniel J Hough; Guoqing Lu; Terry Grande; Gloria Arratia; Guillermo Ortí
Journal:  PLoS Curr       Date:  2013-04-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.