OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of surgery as first-line treatment on event-free survival (EFS) of primary aggressive fibromatosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Treatments were categorized into: surgery with or without radiotherapy and nonsurgical strategies with systemic treatment alone or wait and see policy. Eighty-nine patients had initial resection of their primary tumour followed by postoperative radiotherapy in 13 cases. Twenty-three did not undergo surgery but received systemic treatment or watch and wait policy. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 76 months. Overall 3 years EFS was 49%. In the univariate analysis, patients with microscopically complete surgery had a similar outcome to patients in the no-surgery group (3 years EFS of 65% and 68%, respectively). Gender, age, tumour size, treatment period and strategy (surgery versus no-surgery) were not statistically significant. Quality of resection according to margins and the tumour site were the only prognostic factors. There was a significant correlation between tumour site and quality of surgery (p=0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: A subset of patients with extra-abdominal fibromatosis could be managed with a nonaggressive policy, as growth arrest concerned 2/3 of nonoperated patients. When surgery is finally necessary, it should be performed with the aim of achieving negative margins.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of surgery as first-line treatment on event-free survival (EFS) of primary aggressive fibromatosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Treatments were categorized into: surgery with or without radiotherapy and nonsurgical strategies with systemic treatment alone or wait and see policy. Eighty-nine patients had initial resection of their primary tumour followed by postoperative radiotherapy in 13 cases. Twenty-three did not undergo surgery but received systemic treatment or watch and wait policy. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 76 months. Overall 3 years EFS was 49%. In the univariate analysis, patients with microscopically complete surgery had a similar outcome to patients in the no-surgery group (3 years EFS of 65% and 68%, respectively). Gender, age, tumour size, treatment period and strategy (surgery versus no-surgery) were not statistically significant. Quality of resection according to margins and the tumour site were the only prognostic factors. There was a significant correlation between tumour site and quality of surgery (p=0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: A subset of patients with extra-abdominal fibromatosis could be managed with a nonaggressive policy, as growth arrest concerned 2/3 of nonoperated patients. When surgery is finally necessary, it should be performed with the aim of achieving negative margins.
Authors: Fábio Guilherme Campos; Carlos Augusto Real Martinez; Marleny Novaes; Sérgio Carlos Nahas; Ivan Cecconello Journal: Fam Cancer Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 2.375
Authors: Firouzeh Kamali; Wei-Lien Wang; B A Guadagnolo; Patricia S Fox; Valerae O Lewis; Alexander J Lazar; Anthony P Conley; Vinod Ravi; Mohammad Toliyat; Harshad S Ladha; Brian P Hobbs; Behrang Amini Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2015-11-18 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: J Dômont; S Salas; L Lacroix; V Brouste; P Saulnier; P Terrier; D Ranchère; A Neuville; A Leroux; L Guillou; R Sciot; F Collin; A Dufresne; J-Y Blay; A Le Cesne; J-M Coindre; S Bonvalot; J Bénard Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2010-03-02 Impact factor: 7.640