Literature DB >> 17708596

Combination of peptide OFFGEL fractionation and label-free quantitation facilitated proteomics profiling of extraocular muscle.

Sven Fraterman1, Ulrike Zeiger, Tejvir S Khurana, Neal A Rubinstein, Matthias Wilm.   

Abstract

Several label-free quantitation strategies have been introduced that obliterate the need for expensive isotopically labeled molecules. However label-free approaches have considerably higher demands in respect of repeatability of sample preparation and fractionation than multiplexing isotope labeling-based strategies. OFFGEL fractionation promises the necessary separation efficiency and repeatability. To test this platform, 12-fraction peptide OFFGEL electrophoresis and online reversed-phase LC connected to a quadrupole TOF mass spectrometer were used to determine differences of the physiological, pathological and biochemical distinct extraocular muscle allotype in comparison to hind-limb muscle. Close to 70% of the peptides separated by OFFGEL electrophoresis were detected only in a single fraction. To determine the separation repeatability of four samples, we compared the ion volumes of multiple peptides deriving from the thick filament-associated protein titin over several fractions and determined a coefficient of variation below 20%. Of the 474 proteins identified, 61 proteins were differently expressed between the two muscle allotypes and were involved in metabolism, muscle contraction, stress response, or gene expression. Several expression differences were validated using immunohistochemistry and Western blot analysis. We therefore consider peptide OFFGEL fractionation an effective and efficient addition to our label-free quantitative proteomics workflow.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17708596     DOI: 10.1002/pmic.200700382

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteomics        ISSN: 1615-9853            Impact factor:   3.984


  18 in total

1.  On marathons and Sprints: an integrated quantitative proteomics and transcriptomics analysis of differences between slow and fast muscle fibers.

Authors:  Hannes C A Drexler; Aaron Ruhs; Anne Konzer; Luca Mendler; Mark Bruckskotten; Mario Looso; Stefan Günther; Thomas Boettger; Marcus Krüger; Thomas Braun
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  A robust method for quantitative high-throughput analysis of proteomes by 18O labeling.

Authors:  Elena Bonzon-Kulichenko; Daniel Pérez-Hernández; Estefanía Núñez; Pablo Martínez-Acedo; Pedro Navarro; Marco Trevisan-Herraz; María del Carmen Ramos; Saleta Sierra; Sara Martínez-Martínez; Marisol Ruiz-Meana; Elizabeth Miró-Casas; David García-Dorado; Juan Miguel Redondo; Javier S Burgos; Jesús Vázquez
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 5.911

3.  Expanding the dipeptidyl peptidase 4-regulated peptidome via an optimized peptidomics platform.

Authors:  Arthur D Tinoco; Debarati M Tagore; Alan Saghatelian
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  Systematic comparison of fractionation methods for in-depth analysis of plasma proteomes.

Authors:  Zhijun Cao; Hsin-Yao Tang; Huan Wang; Qin Liu; David W Speicher
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 4.466

5.  Identification of the neuromuscular junction transcriptome of extraocular muscle by laser capture microdissection.

Authors:  Caroline Ketterer; Ulrike Zeiger; Murat T Budak; Neal A Rubinstein; Tejvir S Khurana
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Superior calcium homeostasis of extraocular muscles.

Authors:  Ulrike Zeiger; Claire H Mitchell; Tejvir S Khurana
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2010-08-07       Impact factor: 3.467

7.  Peptide separations by on-line MudPIT compared to isoelectric focusing in an off-gel format: application to a membrane-enriched fraction from C2C12 mouse skeletal muscle cells.

Authors:  Sarah Elschenbroich; Vladimir Ignatchenko; Parveen Sharma; Gerold Schmitt-Ulms; Anthony O Gramolini; Thomas Kislinger
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.466

8.  Transcriptional and functional differences in stem cell populations isolated from extraocular and limb muscles.

Authors:  Eugenia C Pacheco-Pinedo; Murat T Budak; Ulrike Zeiger; Louise Helskov Jørgensen; Sasha Bogdanovich; Henrik Daa Schrøder; Neal A Rubinstein; Tejvir S Khurana
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2008-12-30       Impact factor: 3.107

9.  Shotgun proteomic analysis of cerebrospinal fluid using off-gel electrophoresis as the first-dimension separation.

Authors:  Lashanda N Waller; Kevin Shores; Daniel R Knapp
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 4.466

10.  Extraocular Muscle Repair and Regeneration.

Authors:  Mayank Verma; Krysta Fitzpatrick; Linda K McLoon
Journal:  Curr Ophthalmol Rep       Date:  2017-06-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.