Literature DB >> 17708343

Improved quantity and in vivo function of islets isolated by reduced pressure-controlled injection of collagenase in a rat model.

Shiri Li1, Tetsuya Sakai, Yasuyuki Suzuki, Tadahiro Goto, Tomohiro Tanaka, Takuro Yoshikawa, Keitaro Kakinoki, Yasuki Tanioka, Ippei Matsumoto, Yasuhiro Fujino, Yoshikazu Kuroda.   

Abstract

In islet transplantation, insufficient yield is a major obstacle to one-donor/one-recipient transplant. Collagenase, which is injected via a pancreatic duct to separate islets from acini, can so easily distribute into the islet core that it may result in disruption of islets. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the superiority of reduced pressure-controlled collagenase injection (RPCI) at 80 mmHg on islet isolation to injection at 180 mmHg by examining in vivo transplant experiments besides the yield and the glucose stimulation test in a rat model. Lewis rat pancreases were distended with collagenase solution at 80 mmHg pressure as the RPCI group (group 1) and at 180 mmHg (group 2), followed by isolation. The yield in group 1 (1100 +/- 160 islets with 2750 +/- 530 IEQ) was significantly higher than that in group 2 (900 +/- 130 islets with 1570 +/- 350 IEQ, p < 0.01) due to the significant difference of the number of islets sized >150 microm in diameter, although the purity was not significantly different between the two groups. Stimulation indices in the glucose stimulation tests were 2.88 +/- 1.12 in group 1 and 1.93 +/- 0.62 in group 2 (p < 0.05). The cure rate by transplantation of 100 islets to diabetic nude mice in group 1 (8/10) was significantly higher than that in group 2 (3/10, p < 0.05). In a syngenic transplant model of 90% of islets isolated from one donor, the cure rates were 100% and 67% in groups I and 2, respectively (NS). The area under the curve on the graph of IPGTT on postoperative day 28 in group I was significantly smaller than that in group 2 (p < 0.05). In conclusion, our data show that RPCI at 80 mmHg could contribute to consistently high islet yield and in vivo function in a rat model. It was suggested that the current human protocol should be reviewed from this viewpoint.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17708343     DOI: 10.3727/000000007783464957

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Transplant        ISSN: 0963-6897            Impact factor:   4.064


  3 in total

1.  Prevention of oxidative stress in porcine islet isolation.

Authors:  Philipp Stiegler; Vanessa Stadlbauer; Florian Hackl; Silvia Schaffellner; Florian Iberer; Joachim Greilberger; Dirk Strunk; Sieglinde Zelzer; Carolin Lackner; Karlheinz Tscheliessnigg
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2010-03-06       Impact factor: 1.731

Review 2.  Pig-islet xenotransplantation: recent progress and current perspectives.

Authors:  Hai-Tao Zhu; Wan-Li Wang; Liang Yu; Bo Wang
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2014-03-24

3.  Cost and Scalability Analysis of Porcine Islet Isolation for Islet Transplantation: Comparison of Juvenile, Neonatal and Adult Pigs.

Authors:  Rachel Vanderschelden; Mayilone Sathialingam; Michael Alexander; Jonathan R T Lakey
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 4.064

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.