OBJECTIVES: To investigate in older industrialised societies (a) how social disadvantage contributes to smoking risk among women (b) the role of social and economic policies in reducing disadvantage and moderating wider inequalities in life chances and living standards. METHODS: Review and analysis of (a) the effects of disadvantage in childhood and into adulthood on women's smoking status in early adulthood (b) policy impacts on the social exposures associated with high smoking risk. MAIN RESULTS: (a) Smoking status--ever smoking, current smoking, heavy smoking, and cessation--is influenced not only by current circumstances but by longer term biographies of disadvantage (b) social and economic policies shape key social predictors of women's smoking status, including childhood circumstances, educational levels and adult circumstances, and moderate inequalities in the distribution of these dimensions of life chances and living standards. Together, the two sets of findings argue for a policy toolkit that acts on the distal determinants of smoking, with interventions targeting the conditions in which future and current smokers live. CONCLUSIONS: An approach to tobacco control is advocated that combines changing smoking habits with reducing inequalities in the social trajectories in which they are embedded. Policies to level up opportunities and living standards across the lifecourse should be championed as part of an equity oriented approach to reducing the disease burden of cigarette smoking.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate in older industrialised societies (a) how social disadvantage contributes to smoking risk among women (b) the role of social and economic policies in reducing disadvantage and moderating wider inequalities in life chances and living standards. METHODS: Review and analysis of (a) the effects of disadvantage in childhood and into adulthood on women's smoking status in early adulthood (b) policy impacts on the social exposures associated with high smoking risk. MAIN RESULTS: (a) Smoking status--ever smoking, current smoking, heavy smoking, and cessation--is influenced not only by current circumstances but by longer term biographies of disadvantage (b) social and economic policies shape key social predictors of women's smoking status, including childhood circumstances, educational levels and adult circumstances, and moderate inequalities in the distribution of these dimensions of life chances and living standards. Together, the two sets of findings argue for a policy toolkit that acts on the distal determinants of smoking, with interventions targeting the conditions in which future and current smokers live. CONCLUSIONS: An approach to tobacco control is advocated that combines changing smoking habits with reducing inequalities in the social trajectories in which they are embedded. Policies to level up opportunities and living standards across the lifecourse should be championed as part of an equity oriented approach to reducing the disease burden of cigarette smoking.
Authors: George A Kaplan; Kristine Siefert; Nalini Ranjit; Trivellore E Raghunathan; Elizabeth A Young; Diem Tran; Sandra Danziger; Susan Hudson; John W Lynch; Richard Tolman Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Hazel M Inskip; Keith M Godfrey; Siân M Robinson; Catherine M Law; David J P Barker; Cyrus Cooper Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2005-09-29 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Billie Bonevski; Christine Paul; Catherine D'Este; Robert Sanson-Fisher; Robert West; Afaf Girgis; Mohammad Siahpush; Robert Carter Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2011-01-31 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Stephen T Higgins; Allison N Kurti; Ryan Redner; Thomas J White; Diana R Keith; Diann E Gaalema; Brian L Sprague; Cassandra A Stanton; Megan E Roberts; Nathan J Doogan; Jeff S Priest Journal: Prev Med Date: 2016-02-21 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Stephen T Higgins; Sarah H Heil; Gary J Badger; Joan M Skelly; Laura J Solomon; Ira M Bernstein Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2009-05-12 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Todd M Gibson; Wei Liu; Gregory T Armstrong; Deo Kumar Srivastava; Melissa M Hudson; Wendy M Leisenring; Ann C Mertens; Robert C Klesges; Kevin C Oeffinger; Paul C Nathan; Leslie L Robison Journal: Cancer Date: 2015-08-19 Impact factor: 6.860