Literature DB >> 17707904

A 12 month in vivo study on the response of bone to a hydroxyapatite-polymethylmethacrylate cranioplasty composite.

Hiroshi Itokawa1, T Hiraide, M Moriya, M Fujimoto, G Nagashima, R Suzuki, T Fujimoto.   

Abstract

We investigated the osteoconductivity and biocompatibility in vivo of a new hydroxyapatite-polymethylmethacrylate (HA-PMMA) composite developed for use as an implant material for cranioplasty, which is expected to have the good osteoconductivity of HA together with the strength and ease of handling of PMMA. The HA-PMMA composites were implanted in eight full-grown beagles and then 6, 12, 24 weeks and 1 year after implantation, the animals were sacrificed and the implanted materials removed along with the surrounding tissues. Extirpated specimens were studied using an optical microscope and micro-computed tomography (micro-CT). Fibrous connective tissue was prominent in the interface of the composite at 6 weeks. New bone formation was seen around the implant, 12 and 24 weeks after operation. At 1 year, new bone filled in the interface of the HA-PMMA composite and adhered to the surrounding autogenous bone. Mixing HA and PMMA did not interfere with the osteoconductivity of the HA component. In micro-CT findings, the new bone growing on the HA-PMMA composite could be seen attaching preferentially to HA particles exposed at the composite surface, rather than the PMMA. This study demonstrated that this HA-PMMA composite is a good candidate for cranial bone implants due to its good osteoconductivity and biocompatibility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17707904     DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  7 in total

Review 1.  Biocomposites and hybrid biomaterials based on calcium orthophosphates.

Authors:  Sergey V Dorozhkin
Journal:  Biomatter       Date:  2011 Jul-Sep

Review 2.  Calcium Orthophosphate-Containing Biocomposites and Hybrid Biomaterials for Biomedical Applications.

Authors:  Sergey V Dorozhkin
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2015-08-07

3.  Support for the initial attachment, growth and differentiation of MG-63 cells: a comparison between nano-size hydroxyapatite and micro-size hydroxyapatite in composites.

Authors:  Elena Filová; Tomáš Suchý; Zbyněk Sucharda; Monika Supová; Margit Zaloudková; Karel Balík; Věra Lisá; Miroslav Slouf; Lucie Bačáková
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2014-08-06

4.  Histological assessment of porous custom-made hydroxyapatite implants 6 months and 2.5 years after cranioplasty.

Authors:  Hajime Ono; Taigen Sase; Yuichiro Tanaka; Hiroshi Takasuna
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2017-01-19

5.  Interactive reconstructions of cranial 3D implants under MeVisLab as an alternative to commercial planning software.

Authors:  Jan Egger; Markus Gall; Alois Tax; Muammer Ücal; Ulrike Zefferer; Xing Li; Gord von Campe; Ute Schäfer; Dieter Schmalstieg; Xiaojun Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Demineralization-remineralization dynamics in teeth and bone.

Authors:  Ensanya Ali Abou Neel; Anas Aljabo; Adam Strange; Salwa Ibrahim; Melanie Coathup; Anne M Young; Laurent Bozec; Vivek Mudera
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2016-09-19

7.  Modification of PMMA Cements for Cranioplasty with Bioactive Glass and Copper Doped Tricalcium Phosphate Particles.

Authors:  Teresa Russo; Roberto De Santis; Antonio Gloria; Katia Barbaro; Annalisa Altigeri; Inna V Fadeeva; Julietta V Rau
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-25       Impact factor: 4.329

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.