Literature DB >> 17707753

Antigen sparing and cross-reactive immunity with an adjuvanted rH5N1 prototype pandemic influenza vaccine: a randomised controlled trial.

Isabel Leroux-Roels1, Astrid Borkowski, Thomas Vanwolleghem, Mamadou Dramé, Frédéric Clement, Eliane Hons, Jeanne-Marie Devaster, Geert Leroux-Roels.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Antigen sparing is regarded as crucial for pandemic vaccine development because worldwide influenza vaccine production capacity is limited. Adjuvantation is an important antigen-sparing strategy. We assessed the safety and immunogenicity of a recombinant H5N1 split-virion vaccine formulated with a proprietary adjuvant system and investigated whether it can induce cross-reactive immunity.
METHODS: Two doses of an inactivated split A/Vietnam/1194/2004 NIBRG-14 (recombinant H5N1 engineered by reverse genetics) vaccine were administered 21 days apart to eight groups of 50 volunteers aged 18-60 years. We studied four antigen doses (3.8 microg, 7.5 microg, 15 microg, and 30 microg haemagglutinin) given with or without adjuvant. Blood samples were collected to analyse humoral immune response. Adverse events were recorded up through study day 51. Safety analyses were of the whole vaccinated cohort and immunogenicity analyses per protocol. This trial is registered with the ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00309634.
FINDINGS: All eight vaccine formulations had a good safety profile. No serious adverse events were reported. The adjuvanted vaccines induced more injection-site symptoms and general symptoms than did the non-adjuvanted vaccines, but most were mild to moderate in intensity and transient in nature. The adjuvanted formulations were significantly more immunogenic than the non-adjuvanted formulations at all antigen doses. At the lowest antigenic dose (3.8 microg), immune responses for the adjuvanted vaccine against the recombinant homologous vaccine strain (A/Vietnam/1194/2004 NIBRG-14, clade 1) met or exceeded all US Food and Drug Administration and European Union licensure criteria. Furthermore, 37 of 48 (77%) participants receiving 3.8 microg of the adjuvanted vaccine seroconverted for neutralising antibodies against a strain derived by reverse genetics from a drifted H5N1 isolate (A/Indonesia/5/2005, clade 2).
INTERPRETATION: Adjuvantation conferred significant antigen sparing that could increase the production capacity of pandemic influenza vaccine. Moreover, the cross-clade neutralising antibody responses recorded imply that such a vaccine could be deployed for immunisation before a pandemic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17707753     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61297-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  172 in total

1.  An adjuvant for the induction of potent, protective humoral responses to an H5N1 influenza virus vaccine with antigen-sparing effect in mice.

Authors:  Yuk-Fai Lau; Lay-Hoon Tang; Amber W McCall; Eng-Eong Ooi; Kanta Subbarao
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 2.  Inactivated influenza vaccines: recent progress and implications for the elderly.

Authors:  Valentina Parodi; Daniela de Florentiis; Mariano Martini; Filippo Ansaldi
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 3.923

3.  Immunosenescence and Challenges of Vaccination against Influenza in the Aging Population.

Authors:  Adrian J Reber; Tatiana Chirkova; Jin Hyang Kim; Weiping Cao; Renata Biber; David K Shay; Suryaprakash Sambhara
Journal:  Aging Dis       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 6.745

Review 4.  Avian influenza pandemic preparedness: developing prepandemic and pandemic vaccines against a moving target.

Authors:  Neetu Singh; Aseem Pandey; Suresh K Mittal
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Med       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 5.600

5.  Glycosylation at 158N of the hemagglutinin protein and receptor binding specificity synergistically affect the antigenicity and immunogenicity of a live attenuated H5N1 A/Vietnam/1203/2004 vaccine virus in ferrets.

Authors:  Weijia Wang; Bin Lu; Helen Zhou; Amorsolo L Suguitan; Xing Cheng; Kanta Subbarao; George Kemble; Hong Jin
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 5.103

6.  Virus aggregating peptide enhances the cell-mediated response to influenza virus vaccine.

Authors:  Jeremy C Jones; Erik W Settles; Curtis R Brandt; Stacey Schultz-Cherry
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 7.  Immunobiology of influenza vaccines.

Authors:  Margarita M Gomez Lorenzo; Matthew J Fenton
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of vaccination against pandemic influenza (H1N1) 2009.

Authors:  Nayer Khazeni; David W Hutton; Alan M Garber; Nathaniel Hupert; Douglas K Owens
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Safety and immunogenicity of inactivated, Vero cell culture-derived whole virus influenza A/H5N1 vaccine given alone or with aluminum hydroxide adjuvant in healthy adults.

Authors:  Wendy A Keitel; Cornelia L Dekker; ChrisAnna Mink; James D Campbell; Kathryn M Edwards; Shital M Patel; Dora Y Ho; Helen K Talbot; Kuo Guo; Diana L Noah; Heather Hill
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 3.641

10.  A single-dose influenza A (H5N1) vaccine safe and immunogenic in adult and elderly patients: an approach to pandemic vaccine development.

Authors:  Zoltan Vajo; John Wood; Lajos Kosa; Istvan Szilvasy; Gyorgy Paragh; Zsuzsanna Pauliny; Kálmán Bartha; Ildiko Visontay; Agnes Kis; Istvan Jankovics
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 5.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.