Literature DB >> 17707321

The meaning of excellence.

James B Naidich1, Janice Y Lee, Ethan C Hansen, Lawrence G Smith.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: Program directors would like to interview the very best students applying to their programs. The summary paragraph of the dean's letter should provide useful information regarding a student's performance in medical school. One frequently found descriptor is excellent. However, its very frequency suggests the word may be loosely used. The purpose of this investigation is to determine the meaning of excellence.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The descriptor excellent was searched for in the summary paragraph. An effort was made to determine how many medical schools used excellent, how precisely the medical school defined this word, whether numbers were used to define the upper and lower boundaries of excellent, and what other buzzwords were used in the summary paragraphs for students not defined as excellent.
RESULTS: Excellent was the most common descriptor, used by 75% of the medical schools. Defined numeric boundaries were used by 47% of schools. Tabulated results showed that within a school the range of excellence varied from as tight as 20 percentile points to so broad that 65% of the students were classified as excellent. The boundaries of excellent, among different schools, varied from as low as the third to as high as the ninety-second percentile. In half the schools, students described as excellent might be in the bottom half of their class. A total of 28% of the schools used excellent, but without any numeric definition. No school used excellent to describe its best students.
CONCLUSIONS: Medical student deans often exaggerate the quality of their graduates by using the word excellent at variance with the dictionary definition of exceptionally good. Inaccurate descriptions by deans of their graduating medical students diminish the value of MSPE.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17707321     DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2007.05.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  4 in total

1.  Ranking Practice Variability in the Medical Student Performance Evaluation: So Bad, It's "Good".

Authors:  Megan Boysen Osborn; James Mattson; Justin Yanuck; Craig Anderson; Ara Tekian; John Christian Fox; Ilene B Harris
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  Does the Medical Student Performance Evaluation Change the Decision to Invite Residency Applicants?

Authors:  Terra N Thimm; Christopher S Kiefer; Mara S Aloi; Moira Davenport; Jared Kilpatrick; Jeffrey S Bush; Lindsey Jennings; Stephen M Davis; Kimberly Quedado; Erica B Shaver
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2021-08-21

3.  Who to Interview? Low Adherence by U.S. Medical Schools to Medical Student Performance Evaluation Format Makes Resident Selection Difficult.

Authors:  Megan Boysen-Osborn; Justin Yanuck; James Mattson; Shannon Toohey; Alisa Wray; Warren Wiechmann; Shadi Lahham; Mark I Langdorf
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2016-11-29

4.  Prioritizing the Interview in Selecting Resident Applicants: Behavioral Interviews to Determine Goodness of Fit.

Authors:  Michael B Prystowsky; Evan Cadoff; Yungtai Lo; Tiffany M Hebert; Jacob J Steinberg
Journal:  Acad Pathol       Date:  2021-10-25
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.