BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy with epirubicin is approved in women with breast cancer and is associated with a certain degree of cardiotoxicity. HYPOTHESIS: Epirubicin changes stroke volume, cardiac output and systemic vascular resistance, while liposomal doxorubicin does not. METHODS: 75 patients with HER-2-positive metastatic breast cancer were continuously measured with CW-Doppler ultrasound for stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) before, during and after drug infusion in combination with NT-pro-BNP before and 10 min after drug infusion. RESULTS: Epirubicin infusion increased stroke volume significantly in low-level NT-pro-BNP (62+/-23 ml vs. 74+/-29 ml, p=0.004) and high-level NT-pro-BNP (48+/-5 ml vs. 64+/-20 ml, p=0.131), while liposomal doxorubicin infusion increased stroke volume significantly in low-level NT-pro-BNP (54+/-16 ml vs. 67+/-22 ml, p=0.001) and high-level NT-pro-BNP (65+/-22 ml vs. 82+/-27 ml, p=0.001). Cardiac output was significantly increased in epirubicin (p=0.004) by 20% (NT-pro-BNP<125 pg/ml) and not significantly 38% (NT-pro-BNP>125 pg/ml; p=0.144), while in liposomal doxorubicin cardiac output was significantly increased by 23% (NT-pro-BNP<125 pg/ml; p=0.023) and 33% (NT-pro-BNP>125 pg/ml; p=0.001). In liposomal doxorubicin cardiac index was significantly increased by 26% (NT-pro-BNP<125 pg/ml; p=0.021) and 33% (NT-pro-BNP>125 pg/ml; p=0.0001). SVR was significantly reduced during and after epirubicin therapy. CONCLUSION: Using the CW-Doppler USCOM a different hemodynamic response to epirubicin vs. liposomal doxorubicin is evident. Epirubicin leads to a significant upregulation of stroke volume and cardiac output, which is even more pronounced in the high-level NT-pro-BNP group, while liposomal doxorubicin does not change immediate hemodynamics. No deterioration of cardiac function using the real-time CW-Doppler ultrasound USCOM or an increase in NT-pro-BNP levels was evident during epirubicin or liposomal doxorubicin therapy.
BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy with epirubicin is approved in women with breast cancer and is associated with a certain degree of cardiotoxicity. HYPOTHESIS: Epirubicin changes stroke volume, cardiac output and systemic vascular resistance, while liposomal doxorubicin does not. METHODS: 75 patients with HER-2-positive metastatic breast cancer were continuously measured with CW-Doppler ultrasound for stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) before, during and after drug infusion in combination with NT-pro-BNP before and 10 min after drug infusion. RESULTS:Epirubicin infusion increased stroke volume significantly in low-level NT-pro-BNP (62+/-23 ml vs. 74+/-29 ml, p=0.004) and high-level NT-pro-BNP (48+/-5 ml vs. 64+/-20 ml, p=0.131), while liposomal doxorubicin infusion increased stroke volume significantly in low-level NT-pro-BNP (54+/-16 ml vs. 67+/-22 ml, p=0.001) and high-level NT-pro-BNP (65+/-22 ml vs. 82+/-27 ml, p=0.001). Cardiac output was significantly increased in epirubicin (p=0.004) by 20% (NT-pro-BNP<125 pg/ml) and not significantly 38% (NT-pro-BNP>125 pg/ml; p=0.144), while in liposomal doxorubicin cardiac output was significantly increased by 23% (NT-pro-BNP<125 pg/ml; p=0.023) and 33% (NT-pro-BNP>125 pg/ml; p=0.001). In liposomal doxorubicin cardiac index was significantly increased by 26% (NT-pro-BNP<125 pg/ml; p=0.021) and 33% (NT-pro-BNP>125 pg/ml; p=0.0001). SVR was significantly reduced during and after epirubicin therapy. CONCLUSION: Using the CW-Doppler USCOM a different hemodynamic response to epirubicin vs. liposomal doxorubicin is evident. Epirubicin leads to a significant upregulation of stroke volume and cardiac output, which is even more pronounced in the high-level NT-pro-BNP group, while liposomal doxorubicin does not change immediate hemodynamics. No deterioration of cardiac function using the real-time CW-Doppler ultrasound USCOM or an increase in NT-pro-BNP levels was evident during epirubicin or liposomal doxorubicin therapy.
Authors: Juan Carlos Plana; Maurizio Galderisi; Ana Barac; Michael S Ewer; Bonnie Ky; Marielle Scherrer-Crosbie; Javier Ganame; Igal A Sebag; Deborah A Agler; Luigi P Badano; Jose Banchs; Daniela Cardinale; Joseph Carver; Manuel Cerqueira; Jeanne M DeCara; Thor Edvardsen; Scott D Flamm; Thomas Force; Brian P Griffin; Guy Jerusalem; Jennifer E Liu; Andreia Magalhães; Thomas Marwick; Liza Y Sanchez; Rosa Sicari; Hector R Villarraga; Patrizio Lancellotti Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: H Bryant Nguyen; Daryl P Banta; Gail Stewart; Tommy Kim; Ramesh Bansal; James Anholm; William A Wittlake; Stephen W Corbett Journal: J Clin Monit Comput Date: 2010-06-20 Impact factor: 2.502
Authors: Alessandro Pastore; Sandra Geiger; Dorothee Baur; Andreas Hausmann; Johanna Tischer; Sophia Horster; Hans Joachim Stemmler Journal: World J Oncol Date: 2013-03-06