Literature DB >> 17707075

Radiation therapy for cervical cancer in the elderly.

Hitoshi Ikushima1, Yoshihiro Takegawa, Kyohsuke Osaki, Shunsuke Furutani, Kyoh Yamashita, Takashi Kawanaka, Akiko Kubo, Takaharu Kudoh, Hiromu Nishitani.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term results of radical radiation therapy (RT) for cervical cancer in elderly patients.
METHODS: We reviewed the clinical records of 727 patients with cervical cancer who underwent radical RT at the Tokushima University Hospital and compared the treatment results of three age groups: </=64 years (younger group [YG], 337 patients), 65-74 years (young-old group [YOG], 258 patients), and >/=75 years (older group [OG], 132 patients).
RESULTS: At the last follow-up, 155 YG (46%), 77 YOG (30%), and 48 OG patients (36%) had died of cervical cancer; the median follow-up periods were 82, 87, and 68 months, respectively. The 5-/10-year disease-specific survival rates were 60%/52% in YG, 76%/68% in YOG, and 66%/57% in OG. Differences between OG and the other groups were not significant. The 5-/10-year disease-specific survival rate of YOG was significantly superior to that of YG (p<0.001). Clinical stage was the only significant prognostic variable (p<0.001). Late radiation morbidity of grades 2-4 in the bladder and/or rectum occurred in 22% of YG, 31% of YOG, and 8% of OG patients.
CONCLUSIONS: RT was well tolerated in elderly patients, and age was not a significant prognostic factor. In the management of cervical cancer, advanced age is not a contraindication to radical RT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17707075     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.07.058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  10 in total

1.  Safety and tolerance of radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer in the elderly.

Authors:  Erin M George; Ana I Tergas; Cande V Ananth; William M Burke; Sharyn N Lewin; Eri Prendergast; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Comparison of predictive performance for toxicity by accumulative dose of DVH parameter addition and DIR addition for cervical cancer patients.

Authors:  Yuya Miyasaka; Noriyuki Kadoya; Rei Umezawa; Yoshiki Takayama; Kengo Ito; Takaya Yamamoto; Shohei Tanaka; Suguru Dobashi; Ken Takeda; Kenji Nemoto; Takeo Iwai; Keiichi Jingu
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 2.724

3.  Increasing age predicts poor cervical cancer prognosis with subsequent effect on treatment and overall survival.

Authors:  Bridget A Quinn; Xiaoyan Deng; Adrianne Colton; Dipankar Bandyopadhyay; Jori S Carter; Emma C Fields
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Radiotherapy for Japanese elderly patients with cervical cancer: preliminary survival outcomes and evaluation of treatment-related toxicity.

Authors:  Kenji Yoshida; Ryohei Sasaki; Hideki Nishimura; Daisuke Miyawaki; Tetsuya Kawabe; Yoshiaki Okamoto; Koji Nakabayashi; Shigeki Yoshida; Kazuro Sugimura
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 2.344

5.  Carcinoma of the cervix in elderly patients treated with radiotherapy: patterns of care and treatment outcomes.

Authors:  Ming Yin Lin; Srinivas Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan; David Bernshaw; Pearly Khaw; Kailash Narayan
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 4.401

6.  Selective use of concurrent chemotherapy in elderly cervical cancer patients treated with definitive radiotherapy: experience from two institutions.

Authors:  Kai-Yun You; Hai-Hua Peng; Yan-Hui Jiang; Zhuo-Fei Bi; Xing-Sheng Qiu
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 3.989

Review 7.  Improving outcomes for older women with gynaecological malignancies.

Authors:  Lucy Dumas; Alistair Ring; John Butler; Tania Kalsi; Danielle Harari; Susana Banerjee
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 12.111

8.  Outcome and toxicity of radical radiotherapy or concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for elderly cervical cancer women.

Authors:  Weiping Wang; Xiaorong Hou; Junfang Yan; Jie Shen; Xin Lian; Shuai Sun; Zhikai Liu; Qingyu Meng; Dunhuang Wang; Mei Zhao; Jie Qiu; Ke Hu; Fuquan Zhang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Moving beyond the Cox proportional hazards model in survival data analysis: a cervical cancer study.

Authors:  Lixian Li; Zijing Yang; Yawen Hou; Zheng Chen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-07-19       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Prognostic Model for Predicting Overall and Cancer-Specific Survival Among Patients With Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A SEER Based Study.

Authors:  Zhuolin Li; Yao Lin; Bizhen Cheng; Qiaoxin Zhang; Yingmu Cai
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 6.244

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.