Literature DB >> 17706760

Management of acute organophosphorus pesticide poisoning.

Michael Eddleston1, Nick A Buckley, Peter Eyer, Andrew H Dawson.   

Abstract

Organophosphorus pesticide self-poisoning is an important clinical problem in rural regions of the developing world, and kills an estimated 200,000 people every year. Unintentional poisoning kills far fewer people but is a problem in places where highly toxic organophosphorus pesticides are available. Medical management is difficult, with case fatality generally more than 15%. We describe the limited evidence that can guide therapy and the factors that should be considered when designing further clinical studies. 50 years after first use, we still do not know how the core treatments--atropine, oximes, and diazepam--should best be given. Important constraints in the collection of useful data have included the late recognition of great variability in activity and action of the individual pesticides, and the care needed cholinesterase assays for results to be comparable between studies. However, consensus suggests that early resuscitation with atropine, oxygen, respiratory support, and fluids is needed to improve oxygen delivery to tissues. The role of oximes is not completely clear; they might benefit only patients poisoned by specific pesticides or patients with moderate poisoning. Small studies suggest benefit from new treatments such as magnesium sulphate, but much larger trials are needed. Gastric lavage could have a role but should only be undertaken once the patient is stable. Randomised controlled trials are underway in rural Asia to assess the effectiveness of these therapies. However, some organophosphorus pesticides might prove very difficult to treat with current therapies, such that bans on particular pesticides could be the only method to substantially reduce the case fatality after poisoning. Improved medical management of organophosphorus poisoning should result in a reduction in worldwide deaths from suicide.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17706760      PMCID: PMC2493390          DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61202-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


Organophosphorus pesticide self-poisoning is a major clinical and public-health problem across much of rural Asia. Of the estimated 500 000 deaths from self-harm in the region each year, about 60% are due to pesticide poisoning. Many studies estimate that organophosphorus pesticides are responsible for around two-thirds of these deaths—a total of 200 000 a year. Deaths from unintentional organophosphorus poisoning are less common than those from intentional poisoning and seem to be more common in regions where highly toxic organophosphorus pesticides (WHO Class I toxicity) are available. In a large cohort of Sri Lankan patients poisoned with WHO Class II organophosphorus pesticides, no deaths resulted from unintentional poisoning (Eddleston M, unpublished). Hospitals in rural areas bear the brunt of this problem, seeing many hundreds of patients poisoned by pesticides each year, with a case fatality of 15–30%. Unfortunately, these hospitals are frequently not adequately staffed or equipped to deal with these very sick patients—intensive care beds and ventilators are in short supply—so even unconscious patients are managed on open wards (figure 1). Furthermore, the evidence for treatment is weak and if evidence of benefit does exist for particular antidotes, they are poorly used or unavailable.
Figure 1

Management of a patient with severe organophosphorus poisoning in a Sri Lankan district hospital

The absence of intensive-care beds and ventilators means that unconscious patients are frequently intubated and ventilated on the open ward. This figure is reproduced with permission from the corresponding author.

Improved medical management and provision of antidotes and intensive care beds, together with bans on the most toxic pesticides, should reduce the case fatality for self-poisoning and noticeably reduce the number of deaths from self-harm in rural Asia.

Pathophysiology

Organophosphorus pesticides inhibit esterase enzymes, especially acetylcholinesterase (EC 3.1.1.7) in synapses and on red-cell membranes, and butyrylcholinesterase (EC 3.1.1.8) in plasma. Although acute butyrylcholinesterase inhibition does not seem to cause clinical features, acetylcholinesterase inhibition results in accumulation of acetylcholine and overstimulation of acetylcholine receptors in synapses of the autonomic nervous system, CNS, and neuromuscular junctions. The subsequent autonomic, CNS, and neuromuscular features of organophosphorus poisoning are well known (panel 1). Patients can suddenly develop peripheral respiratory failure while conscious after seemingly recovering from cholinergic crisis, which is termed type II respiratory failure or intermediate syndrome. This syndrome is an important cause of death in patients who have been resuscitated and stabilised on admission to hospital. Diagnosis is made on the basis of clinical suspicion, the characteristic clinical signs, smell of pesticides or solvents, and reduced butyrylcholinesterase or acetylcholinesterase activity in the blood. Patients with severe organophosphorus poisoning typically present with pinpoint pupils, excessive sweating, reduced consciousness, and poor respiration. The major differential diagnosis is carbamate poisoning, which is clinically indistinguishable.

Cholinesterase assays

Diagnosis of organophosphorus poisoning should ideally be confirmed with an assay to measure butyrylcholinesterase activity in plasma (or acetylcholinesterase in whole blood). However, the results of such assays are rarely available in time to affect clinical decisionmaking. Their importance is for guidance of clinical research; understanding of their limitations is essential for interpretation of studies looking at individual pesticides and specific interventions. Unfortunately, much confusion exists about the use and interpretation of these assays (panel 2). Some pesticides inhibit butyrylcholinesterase more effectively than they inhibit acetylcholinesterase. Butyrylcholinesterase activity does not relate to severity of poisoning; however, it can be used as a sensitive marker of exposure to most organophosphorus compounds or other cholinesterase-inhibiting compounds, and for measuring organophosphorus elimination from the body (figure 2).
Figure 2

Use of butyrylcholinesterase recovery as a marker of organophosphorus pesticide elimination in (A) dimethoate and (B) fenthion poisoning

Dimethoate is hydrophilic and rapidly excreted from the body. Plasma butyrylcholinesterase activity therefore begins to rise again within two days of ingestion. By contrast, fenthion is fat soluble and slowly redistributes into the blood after initial distribution into the fat. As a result, fenthion is detectable in the blood for many days and butyrylcholinesterase activity remains inhibited.

Studies suggest that red-cell acetylcholinesterase is a good marker of synaptic function and atropine needs in patients poisoned with organophosphorus, and is therefore probably a good marker of severity. Patients with red-cell acetylcholinesterase activity of at least 30% had normal muscle function and no need for atropine. By contrast, patients with less than 10% of normal red-cell acetylcholinesterase activity had grossly deranged muscle function and needed high doses of atropine. Acetylcholinesterase activity between these values was associated with moderate impairment of muscle function and need for atropine. A major drawback of acetylcholinesterase assays is that the interaction between organophosphorus, acetylcholinesterase, and oximes continues if the sample is left at room temperature for even a few minutes (panel 2). To obtain reliable results, the reaction must be stopped immediately by cooling and dilution of the sample as soon as it is taken from the patient. Otherwise differences of only a few minutes in the time taken to cool a sample will cause notable variation over repeated samples, which makes interpretation difficult.

Principles of therapy

Treatment includes resuscitation of patients and giving oxygen, a muscarinic antagonist (usually atropine), fluids, and an acetylcholinesterase reactivator (an oxime that reactivates acetylcholinesterase by removal of the phosphate group) (panel 3). Respiratory support is given as necessary. Gastric decontamination should be considered only after the patient has been fully resuscitated and stabilised. Patients must be carefully observed after stabilisation for changes in atropine needs, worsening respiratory function because of intermediate syndrome, and recurrent cholinergic features occuring with fat-soluble organophosphorus. Few randomised trials of such poisoning have been done; consequently the evidence base is restricted. Both atropine and oximes were introduced into clinical practice rapidly in the 1950s without clinical trials. As a result, we do not know the ideal regimens for either therapy. Trials of other interventions are hindered because the best way to give the core treatments has not yet been determined and is highly variable in practice. This variability interferes with development of a widely accepted study protocol and limits the external validity of study results.

Efficacy of treatment and outcome

The case fatality reported by hospitals varies markedly—from 1·85% in the Posion Control Centre of Mach Mai hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam to 40% in a German intensive-care unit (Pham Due, Personal Communication). Since so few randomised trials have been done, comparison of effectiveness of therapies given in different hospitals is tempting. Unfortunately, such comparisons are confounded by many factors (panel 4). In particular, although many textbooks regard poisoning with various organophosphorus pesticides to be broadly similar and equally responsive to treatment, differences in chemistry have major consequences for treatment efficacy. The pesticide ingested defines how many patients survive to reach medical attention, how ill they are at admission, effectiveness of oxime therapy, likelihood of recurrent cholinergic crises, or need for respiratory support (panel 4). Such variation reaffirms the importance of randomised trials to measure effectiveness of treatments for specific pesticides.

Initial stabilisation

Severe acute organophosphorus pesticide poisoning is a medical emergency. Treatment must ensure that the patient has a patent airway and adequate breathing and circulation. Ideally, oxygen should be provided at the first opportunity. However, little evidence supports the common advice that atropine must not be given until oxygen is available. In hospitals that have no access to oxygen, atropine should be given early to patients with pesticide poisoning to reduce secretions and improve respiratory function. The patient should be placed in the left lateral position, with the neck extended. This position reduces risk of aspiration, helps keep the airway patent, and could decrease pyloric emptying and absorption of poison. Supportive care should include giving fluids and control of blood glucose. Health-care workers are thought to be at risk of poisoning during initial stabilisation of patients poisoned with organophosphorus. A few Western hospitals have reported cases of such poisoning, but none have shown inhibition of acetylcholinesterase or butyrylcholinesterase in health-care workers consistent with substantial exposure to organophosphorus. Some symptoms, such as headaches and nausea, are possibly due to anxiety or exposure to the organic solvent (eg, xylene) in which the pesticide is mixed. Hundreds of thousands of patients with severe organophosphorus poisoning are seen every year in basic hospitals across Asia; health-care workers take no special precautions and no cases of secondary poisoning have been reported. Reticence by hospital workers to treat patients poisoned with pesticides puts patients at risk. Guidelines recommend universal precautions, maximum ventilation, and frequent rotation of staff, so that effects of solvent and pesticide are kept to a minimum.

Muscarinic antagonist drugs

Although atropine remains the mainstay of therapy worldwide, other muscarinic antagonists have been studied in animals. An important difference between such drugs is their penetration into the CNS. Glycopyrronium bromide and hyoscine methobromide do not enter the CNS, but hyoscine has excellent penetration; atropine enters the CNS, but not to the same degree as hyoscine. The main adverse-effect of atropine is anticholinergic delirium in patients who receive too high a dose. Some physicians therefore prefer glycopyrronium to treat the peripheral effects of organophosphorus without causing confusion. However, its poor CNS penetration suggests that it is ineffective at countering coma and reduced respiration seen in patients with the cholinergic syndrome. A small randomised controlled trial comparing glycopyrronium with atropine noted no significant difference in mortality or ventilation rates, but it did not have sufficient power to detect small differences between treatments. Hyoscine was used successfully to treat a patient with severe extra-pyramidal features but few peripheral signs. Animal studies suggest that it is more effective than atropine for control of seizures induced by inhaled organophosphorus nerve agents. However, extra-pyramidal effects and seizures are not common features of organophosphorus poisoning. Atropine will probably remain the antimuscarinic agent of choice until high-quality randomised trials show another muscarinic antagonist to have a better benefit-to-harm ratio because it is available widely, affordable, and moderately able to penetrate into the CNS. No known randomised controlled trials have compared different regimens of atropine for either loading or continuation therapy. As a result, many different recommendations have been made—a 2004 review noted more than 30 dosing regimens, some of which would take many hours to give the full loading dose of atropine. The aim of early therapy is to reverse cholinergic features and to improve cardiac and respiratory function as quickly as possible. We use a regimen of doubling doses (panel 2), with the aim of raising the pulse above 80 beats per minute and systolic blood pressure above 80 mm Hg, and rapidly reversing bronchospasm and bronchorrhoea. This regimen allows for as much as 70 mg of atropine to be given in stages to a patient in less than 30 min, resulting in rapid stabilisation and low risk of atropine toxicity. A study from south India recorded benefit from an infusion of atropine compared with repeated bolus doses, but it used historical controls thus reducing confidence in this finding. Infusions could reduce fluctuations in blood atropine concentration, reducing the need for frequent patient observation, an important benefit in hospitals with few staff.

Oximes

Oximes reactivate acetylcholinesterase inhibited by oganophosphorus. Pralidoxime was discovered in the mid-1950s by Wilson and colleagues, and was soon successfully introduced into clinical practice for patients with parathion poisoning. Other oximes, such as obidoxime and trimedoxime, have been developed but pralidoxime remains the most widely used. It has four salts: chloride, iodide, metilsulfate, and mesilate. The chloride and iodide salts are used widely, but metilsulfate and mesilate are used mostly in France, Belgium, and the UK. The chloride salt has advantages over iodide—in particular its smaller molecular weight (173 vs 264), which provides 1·5-times more active compound per gram of salt than does iodide. High doses of pralidoxime iodide also puts patients at risk of thyroid toxicity, especially if given for a long period. Despite the beneficial effects of pralidoxime first noted with parathion poisoning, its effectiveness has been much debated, with many Asian clinicians unconvinced of its benefit. In particular, two randomised controlled trials in Vellore, India in the early 1990s noted that low-dose infusions of pralidoxime might cause harm. The absense of clinical benefit could relate to trial design (suboptimum dose, or bias in allocation). Alternatively, this result could suggest that pralidoxime is ineffective in the patients seen at this hospital, perhaps because of the specific pesticide ingested, the amount ingested, or the patients' long delay before pralidoxime is given. A Cochrane review and two other meta-analyses of pralidoxime have been published. The Cochrane review included two randomised controlled trials and reported no clear evidence of benefit or harm. The other meta-analyses combined non-randomised or historically controlled observational studies with randomised controlled trials reducing confidence in their conclusion that oximes are harmful. Since these meta-analyses were completed, a randomised controlled trial in Baramati, India studied the effect of very-high-dose pralidoxime iodide (2 g loading dose, then 1 g either every hour or every 4 h for 48 h, then 1 g every 4 h until recovery) in 200 patients with moderate organophosphorus poisoning (excluding severely ill patients). The high-dose regimen was associated with reduced case fatality (1% vs 8%; odds ratio [OR] 0·12, 95% CI 0·003–0·90), fewer cases of pneumonia (8% vs 35%; 0·16, 0·06–0·39), and reduced time on mechanical ventilation (median 5 days vs 10 days). Laboratory studies to identify the pesticide ingested and degree of baseline acetylcholinesterase inhibition and subsequent reversal were not done. However, this study suggests that large doses of pralidoxime could have benefit if patients are treated early and have good supportive care. Observational studies of pralidoxime and obidoxime suggest that the ability to reverse acetylcholinesterase inhibition with oximes varies with the pesticide ingested (figure 4). Acetylcholinesterase inhibited by diethyl pesticides, such as parathion and quinalphos, seems to be effectively reactivated by oximes, but acetylcholinesterase inhibited by dimethyl organophosphorus, such as monocrotophos or oxydemeton-methyl, seems to respond poorly. We noted that acetylcholinesterase inhibited by S-alkyl-linked organophosphorus, such as profenofos, is not reactivated by oximes at all (figure 4). This difference is probably partly because of variation in the speed of acetylcholinesterase ageing (panel 5) induced by these different pesticides. Interestingly, the Baramati study did not find a difference in benefit of high-dose pralidoxime in moderate dimethyl or diethyl organophosphorus poisoning. Further studies are needed to establish whether this benefit remains for severe poisoning.
Figure 4

Variable response to oximes of acetylcholinesterase inhibited by different classes of organophosphorus pesticides

Acetylcholinesterase was reactivated fully (A) quinalphos, a diethyl pesticide; partially (B) oxydemeton-methyl, a dimethyl pesticide, or not at all (C) profenofos, an S-alkyl pesticide by oximes after poisoning. The arrow shows the time of first dose of pralidoxime. Normal acetylcholinesterase activity is about 600 mU/μmol Hb. In-vitro acetylcholinesterase activity shows how much of the enzyme can be reactivated, i.e. how much of it has not yet aged (in these three cases, on admission when the first dose of pralidoxime was given, A: ∼85%, B: ∼50%, C: 5%, of the enzyme was not aged). All patients presented to hospital within 4 h.

Interpretation of clinical evidence regarding oximes should take into account this variability in response of different pesticides. The clinical effects can also be limited by high concentrations of organophosphorus in the blood after ingestion of a large dose—the pesticide simply re-inhibits any acetylcholinesterase that the oximes reactivate. Oximes will also not be effective for improvement of outcomes if the patient develops severe complications such as aspiration pneumonia or hypoxic brain injury before treatment. Such complications take place most often with fast-acting pesticides such as parathion and dichlorvos. WHO recommends that oximes be given to all symptomatic patients who need atropine. To ensure a therapeutic concentration, a loading dose of pralidoxime chloride or obidoxime is given, then a continuous infusion. The loading dose of oxime should not be given rapidly as a bolus because this method causes vomiting (risking aspiration), tachycardia, and diastolic hypertension.

Benzodiazepines

Patients poisoned with organophosphorus frequently develop agitated delirium. The cause is complex, with contributions from the pesticide itself, atropine toxicity, hypoxia, alcohol ingested with the poison, and medical complications. Although the mainstay of management is prevention or treatment of underlying causes, some patients need pharmacotherapy. Acutely agitated patients will benefit from treatment with diazepam. Diazepam is first-line therapy for seizures; however, seizures are uncommon in well oxygenated patients with pesticide poisoning. Seizures seem to be more common with organophosphorus nerve agents (such as soman and tabun). Animal studies suggest that diazepam reduces neural damage and prevents respiratory failure and death, but studies in humans are few.

Gastrointestinal decontamination

Gastric lavage is often the first intervention poisoned patients receive on presentation to hospital, sometimes at the expense of resuscitation and giving antidote. No evidence shows any form of gastric decontamination to benefit patients poisoned with organophosphorus. Gastric decontamination should only be done after the patient has been stabilised and treated with oxygen, atropine, and an oxime. Gastric lavage is the most common form of decontamination for organophosphorus poisoning despite the absence of randomised controlled trials to confirm benefit. The rate of absorption of organophosphorus from the human bowel is not known; however, with some pesticides, the rapid onset of poisoning in animals and humans suggests that absorption is rapid, occurring within minutes of ingestion. The time window for effective lavage is therefore probably short. Guidelines for treatment of drug self-poisoning suggest that lavage should be considered only if the patient arrives within 1 hour of ingesting poison. The relevance of these guidelines to organophosphorus poisoning is unclear but lavage should probably only be considered for patients who present soon after ingestion of a substantial amount of toxic pesticide who are intubated, or conscious and willing to cooperate. Repeated gastric lavages are recommended in China to remove pesticide remaining in the stomach, although substantial amounts of organophosphorus are unlikely to remain in the stomach after one lavage. Ipecacuanha-induced emesis should not be used in organophosphorus pesticide poisoning. Patients poisoned with organophosphorus can rapidly become unconscious, risking aspiration if ipecacuanha has been given. Mechanically-induced emesis with large quantities of water risks pushing fluid through the pylorus and into the small bowel, probably increasing the rate of absorption. A randomised controlled trial of single and multiple doses of superactivated charcoal in Sri Lanka failed to find a significant benefit of either regimen over placebo in more than 1000 patients poisoned with pesticides. Because activated charcoal binds organophosphorus in vitro, the absence of effect in patients might be due to rapid absorption of pesticide into the blood. Alternatively, the ingested dose in fatal cases could be too large for the amount of charcoal given, the charcoal might be given too late, or the solvent might interfere with binding. No evidence suggests that patients with pesticide poisoning benefit from treatment with activated charcoal.

Other therapies

Current therapy works through only a few mechanisms. Several new therapies have been studied but results were inconclusive. However, future research might reveal several affordable therapies working at separate sites that could complement present treatments. Magnesium sulphate blocks ligand-gated calcium channels, resulting in reduced acetylcholine release from pre-synaptic terminals, thus improving function at neuromuscular junctions, and reduced CNS overstimulation mediated via NMDA receptor activation. A trial in people poisoned with organophosphorus pesticides recorded reduced mortality with magnesium sulphate (0/11 [0%] vs 5/34 [14·7%]; p<0·01). However, the study was small, allocation was not randomised (every fourth patient received the intervention), and the publication incompletely described the dose of magnesium sulphate used and other aspects of the methodology; therefore these results should be interpreted with caution. The alpha2-adrenergic receptor agonist clonidine also reduces acetylcholine synthesis and release from presynaptic terminals. Animal studies show benefit of clonidine treatment, especially in combination with atropine, but effects in human beings are unknown. Sodium bicarbonate is sometimes used for treatment of organophosphorus poisoning in Brazil and Iran, in place of oximes. Increases in blood pH (up to 7·45–7·55) have been reported to improve outcome in dogs through an unknown mechanism; however, a Cochrane review concluded that insufficient evidence exists at present to establish whether sodium bicarbonate should be used in humans poisoned with organophosphorus. Removing organophosphorus from the blood could allow optimum action of other therapies. The roles of haemodialysis and haemofiltration are not yet clear; however, a recent non-randomised controlled study in China suggested a benefit of haemofiltration after poisoning with dichlorvos, which has poor solubility in fat, and therefore should have a relatively small volume of distribution. A systematic review of these therapies in organophosphorus poisoning is underway, but randomised controlled trials will be needed to establish good evidence-based treatment guidelines. Butyrylcholinesterase scavenges organophosphorus in plasma, reducing the amount available to inhibit acetylcholinesterase in synapses. It has been cloned and military research now aims to inject soldiers with the enzyme before exposure to organophosphorus nerve gases. Such a prophylactic approach is not practical for self-poisoning with organophosphorus because we cannot predict when a person is going to ingest the pesticide. Turkish doctors have reported the use of butyrylcholinesterase in fresh frozen plasma to treat poisoned patients. A small controlled study (12 patients given fresh frozen plasma with 21 control patients) recorded benefit, but this trial was not randomised and allocation decisions were unclear. Furthermore, whether or not scavenging of organophosphorus by butyrylcholinesterase is the mechanism for any effect of fresh frozen plasma is unclear. In fact, butylcholinesterase seems unlikely to ever be an effective treatment for pesticide poisoning since it binds stoichiometrically to organophosphorus and will be overpowered by the amount of pesticide commonly ingested. For example, 50 mL of 40% dimethoate (molecular weight 229) contains 20 g or 87·3 mmol of organophosphorous, which, if completely absorbed and transformed into the oxon, would need an equivalent number of moles of butyrylcholinesterase (molecular weight about 70 kD; therefore 6 kg) for inactivation. A better approach than use of butylcholinesterase might be to give recombinant bacterial phosphotriesterases, or hydrolases. These proteins break down organophosphorus pesticides enzymatically and protect animals from pesticide poisoning. Future clinical development of such enzymes could reduce blood concentrations of organophosphorus, allowing optimum activity of other treatments.

Conclusion

Medical management of organophosphorus pesticide poisoning is difficult, especially in resource poor locations where most of these patients present. Clinical practice is frequently less than ideal, with poor initial resuscitation and stabilisation, and poor use of antidotes. However, most of the original research regarding acute organophosphorus poisoning in humans has been published in the past decade, which is a positive development. We expect that in the next decade evidence from continuing research by a number of groups across Asia will finally provide clear guidance on how to treat poisoning with organophosphorus pesticides. Hopefully, this new guidance will include the use of novel antidotes that will reduce the case fatality from pesticide poisoning, and therefore reduce the worldwide number of deaths from self-harm.

Search strategy and selection criteria

We searched for relevant studies by searching PubMed (1960–2006), Embase (1974–2006), UK National Research Register, Cochrane Injuries Group Specialised Register, Clinicaltrials.gov and the Cochrane databases (all until Dec 2006) for “organophosphorus”, “organophosphate”, or “organic phosphorus” and “poisoning” or “toxicity”. We did not limit the search by language; however, we had limited ability to translate papers from China where many studies have been done. Translation of Chinese papers was therefore ordered according to relevance, established by review of English abstracts. We also used information from our continuing studies in Sri Lanka that have recruited more than 2000 patients poisoned with organophosphate, and from discussions with clinicians seeing such patients across Asia.
  86 in total

1.  Secondary contamination in organophosphate poisoning.

Authors:  D Roberts; L Senarathna
Journal:  QJM       Date:  2004-10

Review 2.  Consensus statement: risk of nosocomial organophosphate poisoning in emergency departments.

Authors:  Mark Little; Lindsay Murray
Journal:  Emerg Med Australas       Date:  2004 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.151

3.  Pharmacokinetics and immunologic consequences of exposing macaques to purified homologous butyrylcholinesterase.

Authors:  Yvonne Rosenberg; Chunyuan Luo; Yacov Ashani; Bhupendra P Doctor; Randy Fischer; Gary Wolfe; Ashima Saxena
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  2002-11-29       Impact factor: 5.037

Review 4.  Oximes for acute organophosphate pesticide poisoning.

Authors:  N A Buckley; M Eddleston; L Szinicz
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-01-25

5.  An epidemic of pesticide poisoning in Nicaragua: implications for prevention in developing countries.

Authors:  R McConnell; A J Hruska
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Differences between organophosphorus insecticides in human self-poisoning: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Michael Eddleston; Peter Eyer; Franz Worek; Fahim Mohamed; Lalith Senarathna; Ludwig von Meyer; Edmund Juszczak; Ariyasena Hittarage; Shifa Azhar; Wasantha Dissanayake; M H Rezvi Sheriff; Ladislaus Szinicz; Andrew H Dawson; Nick A Buckley
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Oct 22-28       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 7.  Patterns and problems of deliberate self-poisoning in the developing world.

Authors:  M Eddleston
Journal:  QJM       Date:  2000-11

8.  Optimal patient position for transport and initial management of toxic ingestions.

Authors:  M V Vance; B S Selden; R F Clark
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 5.721

9.  The tragedy of Tauccamarca: a human rights perspective on the pesticide poisoning deaths of 4 children in the Peruvian Andes.

Authors:  Erika Rosenthal
Journal:  Int J Occup Environ Health       Date:  2003 Jan-Mar

10.  Neurophysiological monitoring of pharmacological manipulation in acute organophosphate (OP) poisoning. The effects of pralidoxime, magnesium sulphate and pancuronium.

Authors:  G Singh; G Avasthi; D Khurana; J Whig; R Mahajan
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-08
View more
  200 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacological treatment of organophosphorus insecticide poisoning: the old and the (possible) new.

Authors:  Michael Eddleston; Fazle Rabbi Chowdhury
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Intralipid fat emulsion decreases respiratory failure in a rat model of parathion exposure.

Authors:  Courtney Dunn; Steven B Bird; Romolo Gaspari
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.451

3.  Antibodies-antidotes against organophosphorus compounds.

Authors:  I N Kurkova; A V Reshetnyak; O M Durova; V D Knorre; A Tramontano; A Friboulet; N A Ponomarenko; A G Gabibov; I V Smirnov
Journal:  Dokl Biochem Biophys       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.788

4.  Differentiating neurons derived from human umbilical cord blood stem cells work as a test system for developmental neurotoxicity.

Authors:  Mahendra P Kashyap; Vivek Kumar; Abhishek K Singh; Vinay K Tripathi; Sadaf Jahan; Ankita Pandey; Ritesh K Srivastava; Vinay K Khanna; Aditya B Pant
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2014-05-24       Impact factor: 5.590

Review 5.  Erythrocyte acetylcholinesterase as biomarker of pesticide exposure: new and forgotten insights.

Authors:  Caio R D Assis; Amanda G Linhares; Mariana P Cabrera; Vagne M Oliveira; Kaline C C Silva; Marina Marcuschi; Elba V M Maciel Carvalho; Ranilson S Bezerra; Luiz B Carvalho
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Prenatal organophosphate insecticide exposure and infant sensory function.

Authors:  Monica K Silver; Jie Shao; Chai Ji; Binquan Zhu; Lin Xu; Mingyan Li; Minjian Chen; Yankai Xia; Niko Kaciroti; Betsy Lozoff; John D Meeker
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 5.840

7.  Organophosphate poisoning presenting as out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A clinical challenge.

Authors:  Huey-Shiuen Kuo; Chih-Chieh Yen; Chun-I Wu; Yi-Heng Li; Ju-Yi Chen
Journal:  J Cardiol Cases       Date:  2017-04-22

Review 8.  Butyrylcholinesterase for protection from organophosphorus poisons: catalytic complexities and hysteretic behavior.

Authors:  Patrick Masson; Oksana Lockridge
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 4.013

9.  Clinical findings and cholinesterase levels in children of organophosphates and carbamates poisoning.

Authors:  Abd El-Rahman El-Naggar; Mohammed Shehata Abdalla; Alaa S El-Sebaey; Sayed M Badawy
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2008-11-08       Impact factor: 3.183

10.  Impaired mitochondrial functions in organophosphate induced delayed neuropathy in rats.

Authors:  Anwar Masoud; Ravi Kiran; Rajat Sandhir
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.046

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.