PURPOSE: Descriptions of posterior urethral penetrating injuries are rare in the literature and their management is poorly described. We reviewed the medical records of 19 men who sustained posterior urethral gunshot wounds and report our experience with various treatment options. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 19 men (mean age 27 years) who sustained posterior urethral gunshot wound injuries confirmed by retrograde urethrography and/or exploratory laparotomy. Treatment options included immediate primary repair in 2 patients, delayed reconstruction in 15 and complete prostatectomy in 2. Outcomes were described by flow rates and lower urinary tract symptoms. RESULTS: Of 15 patients who underwent delayed repair 13 (86.6%) demonstrated normal flow rates and lack of lower urinary tract symptoms. The 2 remaining patients experienced obliterative stricture recurrences and were treated with open surgery. Both patients who underwent immediate primary repair had normal flow rates. Of the 2 men who underwent immediate prostatectomy 1 had moderate incontinence requiring absorbent pad use and the other was lost to followup after he was discharged home with a suprapubic catheter in place. CONCLUSIONS: An initial management strategy based on the principles of maximizing urinary catheter drainage, with direct retropubic repair/urethral realignment when possible and definitive perineal reconstruction when necessary, appears to provide acceptable outcomes while minimizing the number of subsequent interventions required.
PURPOSE: Descriptions of posterior urethral penetrating injuries are rare in the literature and their management is poorly described. We reviewed the medical records of 19 men who sustained posterior urethral gunshot wounds and report our experience with various treatment options. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 19 men (mean age 27 years) who sustained posterior urethral gunshot wound injuries confirmed by retrograde urethrography and/or exploratory laparotomy. Treatment options included immediate primary repair in 2 patients, delayed reconstruction in 15 and complete prostatectomy in 2. Outcomes were described by flow rates and lower urinary tract symptoms. RESULTS: Of 15 patients who underwent delayed repair 13 (86.6%) demonstrated normal flow rates and lack of lower urinary tract symptoms. The 2 remaining patients experienced obliterative stricture recurrences and were treated with open surgery. Both patients who underwent immediate primary repair had normal flow rates. Of the 2 men who underwent immediate prostatectomy 1 had moderate incontinence requiring absorbent pad use and the other was lost to followup after he was discharged home with a suprapubic catheter in place. CONCLUSIONS: An initial management strategy based on the principles of maximizing urinary catheter drainage, with direct retropubic repair/urethral realignment when possible and definitive perineal reconstruction when necessary, appears to provide acceptable outcomes while minimizing the number of subsequent interventions required.
Authors: Nadya M Cinman; Jack W McAninch; Sima P Porten; Jeremy B Myers; Sarah D Blaschko; Herman S Bagga; Benjamin N Breyer Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Federico Coccolini; Ernest E Moore; Yoram Kluger; Walter Biffl; Ari Leppaniemi; Yosuke Matsumura; Fernando Kim; Andrew B Peitzman; Gustavo P Fraga; Massimo Sartelli; Luca Ansaloni; Goran Augustin; Andrew Kirkpatrick; Fikri Abu-Zidan; Imitiaz Wani; Dieter Weber; Emmanouil Pikoulis; Martha Larrea; Catherine Arvieux; Vassil Manchev; Viktor Reva; Raul Coimbra; Vladimir Khokha; Alain Chichom Mefire; Carlos Ordonez; Massimo Chiarugi; Fernando Machado; Boris Sakakushev; Junichi Matsumoto; Ron Maier; Isidoro di Carlo; Fausto Catena Journal: World J Emerg Surg Date: 2019-12-02 Impact factor: 5.469