Literature DB >> 17706309

Set-up errors due to endorectal balloon positioning in intensity modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

Chun-Wei Wang1, Fok-Ching Chong, Ming-Kuen Lai, Yeong-Shiau Pu, Jian-Kuen Wu, Jason Chia-Hsien Cheng.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the set-up errors and deformation associated with daily placement of endorectal balloons in prostate radiotherapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Endorectal balloons were placed daily in 20 prostate cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. Electronic portal images (EPIs) were collected weekly from anterior-posterior (AP) and lateral views. The EPIs were compared with digitally reconstructed radiographs from computed tomography scans obtained during pretreatment period to estimate displacements. The interfraction deformation of balloon was estimated with variations in diameter in three orthogonal directions throughout the treatment course.
RESULTS: A total of 154 EPIs were evaluated. The mean displacements of balloon relative to bony landmark were 1.8mm in superior-inferior (SI), 1.3mm in AP, and 0.1mm in left-right (LR) directions. The systematic errors in SI, AP, and LR directions were 3.3mm, 4.9 mm, and 4.0mm, respectively. The random (interfraction) displacements, relative to either bony landmarks or treatment isocenter, were larger in SI direction (4.5mm and 4.5mm), than in AP (3.9 mm and 4.4mm) and LR directions (3.0mm and 3.0mm). The random errors of treatment isocenter to bony landmark were 2.3mm, 3.2mm, and 2.6mm in SI, AP, and LR directions, respectively. Over the treatment course, balloon deformations of 2.8mm, 2.5mm, and 2.6mm occurred in SI, AP, and LR directions, respectively. The coefficient of variance of deformation was 7.9%, 4.9%, and 4.9% in these directions.
CONCLUSIONS: Larger interfractional displacement and the most prominent interfractional deformation of endorectal balloon were both in SI direction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17706309     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2007.06.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  5 in total

Review 1.  Effectiveness of rectal displacement devices in managing prostate motion: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mahdieh Afkhami Ardekani; Hamed Ghaffari; Mahmoud Navaser; Seyed Hamid Zoljalali Moghaddam; Soheila Refahi
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Analysis of inter-fraction setup errors and organ motion by daily kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography in intensity modulated radiotherapy of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Marcella Palombarini; Stefano Mengoli; Paola Fantazzini; Cecilia Cadioli; Claudio Degli Esposti; Giovanni Piero Frezza
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 3.481

3.  Clinical evaluation of an endorectal immobilization system for use in prostate hypofractionated Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy (SABR).

Authors:  Alexandru Nicolae; Melanie Davidson; Harry Easton; Joelle Helou; Hima Musunuru; Andrew Loblaw; Ananth Ravi
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-05-30       Impact factor: 3.481

4.  Spatial and dosimetric evaluation of residual distortions of prostate and seminal vesicle bed after image-guided definitive and postoperative radiotherapy of prostate cancer with endorectal balloon.

Authors:  Sabine Levegrün; Christoph Pöttgen; Konstantinos Xydis; Maja Guberina; Jehad Abu Jawad; Martin Stuschke
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Adaptive radiotherapy and the dosimetric impact of inter- and intrafractional motion on the planning target volume for prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Felix Böckelmann; Florian Putz; Karoline Kallis; Sebastian Lettmaier; Rainer Fietkau; Christoph Bert
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 3.621

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.