Literature DB >> 17706001

Attention to internal face features in unfamiliar face matching.

Kingsley I Fletcher1, Marcus A Butavicius, Michael D Lee.   

Abstract

Accurate matching of unfamiliar faces is vital in security and forensic applications, yet previous research has suggested that humans often perform poorly when matching unfamiliar faces. Hairstyle and facial hair can strongly influence unfamiliar face matching but are potentially unreliable cues. This study investigated whether increased attention to the more stable internal face features of eyes, nose, and mouth was associated with more accurate face-matching performance. Forty-three first-year psychology students decided whether two simultaneously presented faces were of the same person or not. The faces were displayed for either 2 or 6 seconds, and had either similar or dissimilar hairstyles. The level of attention to internal features was measured by the proportion of fixation time spent on the internal face features and the sensitivity of discrimination to changes in external feature similarity. Increased attention to internal features was associated with increased discrimination in the 2-second display-time condition, but no significant relationship was found in the 6-second condition. Individual differences in eye-movements were highly stable across the experimental conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17706001     DOI: 10.1348/000712607X235872

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Psychol        ISSN: 0007-1269


  6 in total

1.  Response to familiar faces, newly familiar faces, and novel faces as assessed by ERPs is intact in adults with autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Sara J Webb; Emily J H Jones; Kristen Merkle; Michael Murias; Jessica Greenson; Todd Richards; Elizabeth Aylward; Geraldine Dawson
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 2.997

2.  Infrequent faces bias social attention differently in manual and oculomotor measures.

Authors:  Effie J Pereira; Elina Birmingham; Jelena Ristic
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Can changes in eye movement scanning alter the age-related deficit in recognition memory?

Authors:  Jessica P K Chan; Daphne Kamino; Malcolm A Binns; Jennifer D Ryan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-05-12

4.  How Different is Different? Criterion and Sensitivity in Face-Space.

Authors:  Harold Hill; Peter Claes; Michelle Corcoran; Mark Walters; Alan Johnston; John Gerald Clement
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-03-23

5.  Eye Movement Dynamics Differ between Encoding and Recognition of Faces.

Authors:  Joseph M Arizpe; Danielle L Noles; Jack W Tsao; Annie W-Y Chan
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2019-02-12

6.  The Own-Race Bias for Face Recognition in a Multiracial Society.

Authors:  Hoo Keat Wong; Ian D Stephen; David R T Keeble
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-03-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.