Literature DB >> 17705992

Standardized criterion to analyze and directly compare various materials and models for peripheral nerve regeneration.

Ioannis V Yannas1, Mei Zhang, Mark H Spilker.   

Abstract

Progress in understanding conditions for optimal peripheral nerve regeneration has been stunted due to lack of standardization of experimental conditions and assays. In this paper we review the large database that has been generated using the Lundborg nerve chamber model and compare various theories for their ability to explain the experimental data. Data were normalized based on systematic use of the critical axon elongation, the gap length at which the probability of axon reconnection between the stumps is just 50%. Use of this criterion has led to a rank-ordering of devices or treatments and has led, in turn, to conclusions about the conditions that facilitate regeneration. Experimental configurations that have maximized facilitation of peripheral nerve regeneration are those in which the tube wall comprised degradable polymers, including collagen and certain synthetic biodegradable polymers, and was cell-permeable rather than protein-permeable. Tube fillings that showed very high regenerative activity were suspensions of Schwann cells, a solution either of acidic or basic fibroblast growth factor, insoluble ECM substrates rather than solutions or gels, polyamide filaments oriented along the tube axis and highly porous, insoluble analogs of the ECM with specific structure and controlled degradation rate. It is suggested that the data are best explained by postulating that the quality of regeneration depends on two critical processes. The first is compression of stumps and regenerating nerve by a thick myofibroblast layer that surrounds these tissues and blocks synthesis of a nerve of large diameter (pressure cuff theory). The second is synthesis of linear columns of Schwann cells that serve as tracks for axon elongation (basement membrane microtube theory). It is concluded that experimental configurations that show high regenerative activity suppress the first process while facilitating the second.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17705992     DOI: 10.1163/156856207781494386

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomater Sci Polym Ed        ISSN: 0920-5063            Impact factor:   3.517


  10 in total

1.  In vivo study of ethyl-2-cyanoacrylate applied in direct contact with nerves regenerating in a novel nerve-guide.

Authors:  A Merolli; S Marceddu; L Rocchi; F Catalano
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 2.  Regeneration of injured skin and peripheral nerves requires control of wound contraction, not scar formation.

Authors:  Ioannis V Yannas; Dimitrios S Tzeranis; Peter T C So
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 3.617

3.  Initial observations on using magnesium metal in peripheral nerve repair.

Authors:  J J Vennemeyer; T Hopkins; M Hershcovitch; K D Little; M C Hagen; D Minteer; D B Hom; K Marra; S K Pixley
Journal:  J Biomater Appl       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 2.646

4.  3D-printed nerve guidance conduits multi-functionalized with canine multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells promote neuroregeneration after sciatic nerve injury in rats.

Authors:  Diego Noé Rodríguez-Sánchez; Giovana Boff Araujo Pinto; Luciana Politti Cartarozzi; Alexandre Leite Rodrigues de Oliveira; Ana Livia Carvalho Bovolato; Marcio de Carvalho; Jorge Vicente Lopes da Silva; Janaina de Andréa Dernowsek; Marjorie Golim; Benedito Barraviera; Rui Seabra Ferreira; Elenice Deffune; Mathues Bertanha; Rogério Martins Amorim
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 6.832

5.  Electrospun silk fibroin fiber diameter influences in vitro dermal fibroblast behavior and promotes healing of ex vivo wound models.

Authors:  Tom Hodgkinson; Xue-Feng Yuan; Ardeshir Bayat
Journal:  J Tissue Eng       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 7.813

6.  Use of nerve conduits for peripheral nerve injury repair: A Web of Science-based literature analysis.

Authors:  Jinniang Nan; Xuguang Hu; Hongxiu Li; Xiaonong Zhang; Renjing Piao
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 5.135

7.  Dual-Component Gelatinous Peptide/Reactive Oligomer Formulations as Conduit Material and Luminal Filler for Peripheral Nerve Regeneration.

Authors:  Caroline Kohn-Polster; Divya Bhatnagar; Derek J Woloszyn; Matthew Richtmyer; Annett Starke; Alexandra H Springwald; Sandra Franz; Michaela Schulz-Siegmund; Hilton M Kaplan; Joachim Kohn; Michael C Hacker
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-05-21       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Long-Term Effects of Fibrin Conduit with Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Immunosuppression after Peripheral Nerve Repair in a Xenogenic Model.

Authors:  Aleksandra M McGrath; Maria Brohlin; Rebecca Wiberg; Paul J Kingham; Lev N Novikov; Mikael Wiberg; Liudmila N Novikova
Journal:  Cell Med       Date:  2018-05-31

9.  Electroacupuncture and Acupuncture Promote the Rat's Transected Median Nerve Regeneration.

Authors:  C Y Ho; C H Yao; W C Chen; W C Shen; D T Bau
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 2.629

10.  Electrospun micro- and nanofiber tubes for functional nervous regeneration in sciatic nerve transections.

Authors:  Silvia Panseri; Carla Cunha; Joseph Lowery; Ubaldo Del Carro; Francesca Taraballi; Stefano Amadio; Angelo Vescovi; Fabrizio Gelain
Journal:  BMC Biotechnol       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 2.563

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.