Literature DB >> 17705569

Absorption of fentanyl from fentanyl buccal tablet in cancer patients with or without oral mucositis: a pilot study.

Mona Darwish1, Mary Kirby, Philmore Robertson, William Tracewell, John G Jiang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Patients with cancer, particularly those undergoing chemotherapy or radiotherapy, may develop oral mucositis. This is the first study to investigate the absorption profile of fentanyl buccal tablet (FBT) - an effervescent formulation of fentanyl indicated for the management of breakthrough pain in opioid-tolerant cancer patients - in patients with or without oral mucositis.
METHODS: In this open-label study, patients with or without oral mucositis self-administered a single 200 microg dose of FBT by placing the tablet between the upper gum and cheek above a molar tooth. Venous blood samples for measurement of plasma fentanyl concentrations were collected at regular intervals up to 8 hours following FBT administration. Parameters of interest included maximum plasma concentration (C(max)), time to reach C(max) (t(max)), area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to 8 hours (AUC(8)), and AUC from time zero to the median t(max) (AUC(tmax)(')). Adverse events were monitored throughout the study. Oral mucosal examinations and measurements of vital signs were performed at intervals up to 8 hours following FBT administration.
RESULTS: Sixteen patients, 8 with and 8 without oral mucositis, received FBT and completed the study. The severity of oral mucositis was mild in the patients exhibiting this condition. Median C(max) values were comparable: 1.14 ng/mL (range 0.26-2.69 ng/mL) in patients with mucositis, and 1.21 ng/mL (range 0.21-2.34 ng/mL) in patients without mucositis. The t(max) was not significantly different in the two groups: median t(max) was 25.0 min (range 15-45 min) in patients with mucositis and 22.5 min (range 10-121 min) in patients without mucositis. Median AUC(tmax') values were 0.17 ng . h/mL (range 0.04-0.52 ng . h/mL) in patients with mucositis, and 0.20 ng . h/mL (range 0.00-0.65 ng . h/mL) in patients without mucositis. The corresponding AUC(8) values were 2.05 ng . h/mL (range 1.16-3.83 ng . h/mL) and 1.55 ng . h/mL (range 0.74-3.07 ng . h/mL), respectively. FBT was generally well tolerated in this small group. No application site adverse events or changes in oral mucosal assessments were reported.
CONCLUSION: The absorption profile of a single dose of FBT 200 microg was similar in patients with or without mild oral mucositis. The compound was generally well tolerated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17705569     DOI: 10.2165/00044011-200727090-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Drug Investig        ISSN: 1173-2563            Impact factor:   2.859


  12 in total

Review 1.  Prevention and treatment of oropharyngeal mucositis following cancer therapy: are there new approaches?

Authors:  Karis K F Kwong
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.592

2.  Pharmacokinetics and dose proportionality of fentanyl effervescent buccal tablets in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Mona Darwish; Kenneth Tempero; Mary Kirby; Jeffrey Thompson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Oral status during radiotherapy and chemotherapy: a descriptive study of patient experiences and the occurrence of oral complications.

Authors:  K E Ohrn; Y B Wahlin; P O Sjödén
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Breakthrough pain: characteristics and impact in patients with cancer pain.

Authors:  R K Portenoy; D Payne; P Jacobsen
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 6.961

5.  Prospective evaluation of oral mucositis in patients receiving myeloablative conditioning regimens and haemopoietic progenitor rescue.

Authors:  A M Wardley; G C Jayson; R Swindell; G R Morgenstern; J Chang; R Bloor; C J Fraser; J H Scarffe
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 6.998

6.  Trends in Cancer Pain Management.

Authors: 
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.302

7.  Pharmacokinetic properties of fentanyl effervescent buccal tablets: a phase I, open-label, crossover study of single-dose 100, 200, 400, and 800 microg in healthy adult volunteers.

Authors:  Mona Darwish; Mary Kirby; Philmore Robertson; William Tracewell; John G Jiang
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.393

8.  Factors influencing oral cavity status during high-dose antineoplastic therapy: a secondary data analysis.

Authors:  A M Berger; J Eilers
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 9.  Mucositis as a biological process: a new hypothesis for the development of chemotherapy-induced stomatotoxicity.

Authors:  S T Sonis
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 5.337

10.  Oral capsaicin provides temporary relief for oral mucositis pain secondary to chemotherapy/radiation therapy.

Authors:  A Berger; M Henderson; W Nadoolman; V Duffy; D Cooper; L Saberski; L Bartoshuk
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.612

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  A review of factors explaining variability in fentanyl pharmacokinetics; focus on implications for cancer patients.

Authors:  Evelien J M Kuip; Maarten L Zandvliet; Stijn L W Koolen; Ron H J Mathijssen; Carin C D van der Rijt
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-10-29       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  A comprehensive review of rapid-onset opioids for breakthrough pain.

Authors:  Howard Smith
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 5.749

3.  Recent advances in the use of opioids for cancer pain.

Authors:  Joanne Droney; Julia Riley
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 3.133

4.  A new transmucosal drug delivery system for patients with breakthrough cancer pain: the fentanyl effervescent buccal tablet.

Authors:  Enno Freye
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 3.133

5.  Absorption and tolerability of fentanyl buccal soluble film (FBSF) in patients with cancer in the presence of oral mucositis.

Authors:  Andrew L Finn; Wd Charlie Hill; Ignacio Tagarro; Larry N Gever
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 3.133

6.  Rapid acting fentanyl formulations in breakthrough pain in cancer. Drug selection by means of the System of Objectified Judgement Analysis.

Authors:  Robert Janknegt; Marieke van den Beuken; Sjouke Schiere; Michael Überall; Roger Knaggs; Jaquie Hanley; Morten Thronaes
Journal:  Eur J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2017-01-11

7.  Pharmacokinetics of Sublingually Delivered Fentanyl in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Treated with Curatively Aimed Chemo or Bioradiotherapy.

Authors:  Evelien J M Kuip; Wendy H Oldenmenger; Esther Oomen-de Hoop; Gerda M Verduijn; Martine F Thijs-Visser; Peter de Bruijn; Esther van Meerten; Stijn L W Koolen; Ron H J Mathijssen; Carin C D van der Rijt
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 6.639

8.  Considerations in selecting rapid-onset opioids for the management of breakthrough pain.

Authors:  Howard S Smith
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 3.133

9.  Fentanyl transmucosal tablets: current status in the management of cancer-related breakthrough pain.

Authors:  Eric Prommer; Brandy Ficek
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 2.711

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.