Literature DB >> 17704490

Endovascular repair of the aortic arch.

Timothy A M Chuter1, Darren B Schneider.   

Abstract

The aortic arch is a challenging site for endovascular repair. The proximal implantation site is often wide, angulated, conical, and limited in length by the presence of vital branches to the head and arms. The only way to lengthen the implantation site without risking stroke is to provide an alternative source of inflow through endovascular or extravascular bypass. The complexity and stroke risk of branched stent-graft implantation increases exponentially with each additional branch. In our opinion, the safest strategy is to limit the stent graft to a single side branch. This bifurcated stent graft requires multiple bypass grafts in the neck but avoids median sternotomy and partial aortic clamping. Stent-graft implantation through the carotid or innominate artery provides a short, straight route to the proximal ascending aorta and ensures simple accurate placement of the innominate limb. In our experience, the primary limitation has been the anatomy of the ascending thoracic aorta, which may be too short or too wide. Previously created coronary bypass grafts (if patent) may also prevent proximal stent-graft implantation. The bypass grafts and route of access through the neck and groin are created using standard surgical techniques. Both components of the stent graft are implanted during brief periods of cardiac standstill. The tip of the bifurcated stent-graft delivery system is introduced over a curved guidewire into the left ventricle. Otherwise, the endovascular techniques of bifurcated arch repair are essentially those of bifurcated abdominal aortic repair. Despite high flows and wide-diameter components, current experience has shown bifurcated stent grafts of this type to be stable with follow-up over 3 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17704490     DOI: 10.1177/1531003507304165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther        ISSN: 1521-5768


  7 in total

1.  Evolution of aortic arch repair.

Authors:  Joseph S Coselli; Susan Y Green
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2009

2.  Endovascular total arch replacement techniques and early results.

Authors:  Vladimir Makaloski; Nikolaos Tsilimparis; Fiona Rohlffs; Franziska Heidemann; Eike Sebastian Debus; Tilo Kölbel
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2018-05

3.  The modified chimney technique with a thoracic aortic stent graft to preserve the blood flow of the left common carotid artery for treating descending thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection.

Authors:  Kyung Nam Lee; Han Cheol Lee; Jin Sup Park; Bo Won Kim; Kwang Soo Cha; Sang-Pil Kim; Chung Won Lee; Hae Kyu Kim
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 3.243

4.  Utility of Chimney Stentgraft Technique for Patients with Short Zone 1.

Authors:  Yosuke Inoue; Hitoshi Matsuda; Tetsuya Fukuda; Yoshihiro Sanda; Yoshiaki Morita; Tatsuya Oda; Yutaka Iba; Hiroshi Tanaka; Hiroaki Sasaki; Kenji Minatoya; Junjiro Kobayashi
Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis       Date:  2015-09-29

5.  Results with an algorithmic approach to hybrid repair of the aortic arch.

Authors:  Nicholas D Andersen; Judson B Williams; Jennifer M Hanna; Asad A Shah; Richard L McCann; G Chad Hughes
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2012-11-24       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 6.  Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR).

Authors:  Andrew England; Richard Mc Williams
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  2013-01

7.  Endovascular repair of an aortic arch pseudoaneurysm with double chimney stent grafts: a case report.

Authors:  Weimin Zhou; Wei Zhou; Jiehua Qiu
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 1.637

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.