Literature DB >> 17704073

Swimming in the upside down catfish Synodontis nigriventris: it matters which way is up.

Robert W Blake1, Keith H S Chan.   

Abstract

Synodontis nigriventris is a surface-feeding facultative air-breather that swims inverted with its zoological ventral side towards the water surface. Their near-surface drag is about double the deeply submerged drag (due to wave drag) and roughly twice the sum of frictional and pressure drags. For streamlined technical bodies, values of wave drag augmentation near the surface may be five times the deeply submerged values. However, the depth dependence of drag is similar for fish and streamlined technical bodies, with augmentation vanishing at about 3 body diameters below the surface. Drag ;inverted' is approximately 15% less than that ;dorsal side up' near the surface. Consistent with this, at any given velocity, tailbeat frequency is lower and stride length higher for inverted swimming in surface proximity (P<0.05). Deeply submerged, there are no significant differences in drag and kinematics between postures (P>0.05). At the critical Froude number of 0.45, speeds in surface proximity correspond to prolonged swimming that ends in fatigue. To exceed these speeds, the fish must swim deeply submerged and this behaviour is observed. Inverted swimming facilitates efficient air breathing. Drag dorsal side up during aquatic surface respiration is 1.5 times the value for the inverted posture. Fast-starts are rectilinear, directly away from the stimulus. Average and maximum velocity and acceleration decrease in surface proximity (P<0.05) and are higher inverted (maximum acceleration: 20-30 m s(-2); P<0.05) and comparable to locomotor generalists (e.g. trout). Mechanical energy losses due to wave generation are about 20% for inverted and 40% for dorsal side up, and lower than for trout fast-starting in shallow water (70% losses); bottom effects and large amplitude C-starts (c.f. relatively low amplitude rectilinear motions in S. nigriventris) enhance resistance in trout. S. nigriventris probably evolved from a diurnal or crepuscular 'Chiloglanis-like' benthic ancestor. Nocturnality and reverse countershading likely co-evolved with the inverted habit. Presumably, the increased energy cost of surface swimming is offset by exploiting the air-water interface for food and/or air breathing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17704073     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.006437

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  3 in total

1.  Computer vision, camouflage breaking and countershading.

Authors:  Ariel Tankus; Yehezkel Yeshurun
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Leatherbacks swimming in silico: modeling and verifying their momentum and heat balance using computational fluid dynamics.

Authors:  Peter N Dudley; Riccardo Bonazza; T Todd Jones; Jeanette Wyneken; Warren P Porter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Swimming Turned on Its Head: Stability and Maneuverability of the Shrimpfish (Aeoliscus punctulatus).

Authors:  F E Fish; R Holzman
Journal:  Integr Org Biol       Date:  2019-10-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.