Literature DB >> 17703906

Breast US in patients who had microcalcifications with low concern of malignancy on screening mammography.

Seok Seon Kang1, Eun Young Ko, Boo-Kyung Han, Jung Hee Shin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To review ultrasound (US) findings in patients who have suspicious microcalcifications with low concern of malignancy (BI-RADS category 4A) on screening mammography and to evaluate helpful findings in differentiating benign and malignant lesions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between August 2005 and July 2006, 192 patients showed microcalcifications only, without mass or associated density, on screening mammography. Among them, we selected 82 patients who had microcalcifications with low concern of malignancy (category 4A) that were pathologically confirmed by surgical excision after wire localization (n=23) or biopsy (n=59). Breast US was performed in 37/82 cases and we analyzed the US findings for the calcification areas in these patients, evaluating the findings with benign or malignant pathological results. We correlated US findings with mammographic calcifications using mammography-guided 2D-localization for the calcifications before US examination.
RESULTS: There were 12 malignant lesions (32.4%) including 3 invasive ductal carcinomas (IDC), one microinvasive ductal carcinoma (MIDC), 8 ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and 25 benign lesions (67.6%) including 2 atypical ductal hyperplasias (ADH). IDC showed calcifications within heterogeneous hypoechoic parenchyma or calcifications within complex hypoechoic masses of taller-than-wide shape on US. One MIDC showed calcifications within heterogeneous hypoechoic parenchyma and six DCIS showed negative findings, or calcifications with a small nodule, or only calcifications on US. The most common positive US finding in benign lesions was cysts with calcifications. In 24/37 cases (64.8%) with negative US findings, 18 (75%) were benign lesions and 6 (25%) were DCIS.
CONCLUSION: In patients with category 4A microcalcifications without associated findings on screening mammography, negative US findings had a high rate of benign results (18/24, 75%). Visible calcifications within heterogeneous hypoechoic parenchyma or mass on US increased the probability of malignancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17703906     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.06.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  5 in total

1.  Breast US in patients with breast cancer presenting as only microcalcifications on mammography: can US differentiate ductal carcinoma in situ from invasive cancer?

Authors:  Ji-Yeon Han; Jin Hwa Lee; Eun-Kyung Kim; Suyoung Shin; Myong Jin Kang; Keun-Cheol Lee; Kyung Jin Nam
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 1.314

2.  US and MRI in the evaluation of mammographic BI-RADS 4 and 5 microcalcifications.

Authors:  Ana Hrkac Pustahija; Gordana Ivanac; Boris Brkljacic
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.630

3.  Can positron emission mammography help to identify clinically significant breast cancer in women with suspicious calcifications on mammography?

Authors:  Almir G V Bitencourt; Eduardo N P Lima; Bruna R C Macedo; Jorge L F A Conrado; Elvira F Marques; Rubens Chojniak
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Using MRI to detect and differentiate calcium oxalate and calcium hydroxyapatite crystals in air-bubble-free phantom.

Authors:  Devkumar Mustafi; Xiaobing Fan; Bo Peng; Sean Foxley; Jeremy Palgen; Gillian M Newstead
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 2.685

5.  Ultrasonographic features of ductal carcinoma in situ: analysis of 219 lesions.

Authors:  Jun Kang Li; Huan Fan Wang; Yan He; Yong Huang; Gang Liu; Zhi Li Wang
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2020-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.