Literature DB >> 17703897

The role of awareness and working memory in human transitive inference.

M Libben1, D Titone.   

Abstract

The human ability to perform transitive inference (TI) is an area of debate from a neurocognitive standpoint. Some studies emphasize a stimulus driven medial-temporal lobe process [Preston, A.R., Shrager, Y., Dudukovic, N.M., Gabrieli, J.D., 2004. Hippocampal contribution to the novel use of relational information in declarative memory. Hippocampus 14, 148-152; Titone, D., Ditman, T., Holzman, P., Eichenbaum, H., Levy, D., 2004. A transitive inference test of relational memory in schizophrenia. Schizophr. Res. 68, 235-247; Van Elzakker, M., O'Reilley, R., Rudy, J., 2003. Transivity, flexibility, conjenctive representation and the hippocampus: an empirical analysis. Hippocampus 13, 334-340] while others emphasize a higher-level frontal lobe strategy that requires the flexible maintenance of information in working memory [Waltz, J., Knowlton, B., Holyoak, K., Boone, K., Mishkin, F., de Menedezes Santos, M., Thomas, C., Miller, B., 1999. A system for relational reasoning in human prefrontal cortex. Psychol. Sci. 10, 119-125]. In two experiments we investigated when and how adults employ different cognitive strategies during TI by evaluating the interaction between task instructions and individual differences in working memory capacity. Participants engaged in a paired discrimination task involving a 6-unit TI hierarchy and were either prior aware, prior unaware or serendipitously aware of the hierarchical relationship among stimulus items. Both prior aware participants and serendipitously aware participants were more likely to engage in a logic-based strategy compared to unaware participants who relied upon stimulus-driven strategies. Individual differences in working memory were associated with the acquisition of awareness in the serendipitously aware group and with the maintenance of awareness in the prior aware group. These findings suggest that the capacity for TI may be supported by multiple neurocognitive strategies, and that the specific strategy employed is dependent upon both task- and participant-related factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17703897     DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2007.06.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  16 in total

1.  Relational framework improves transitive inference across age groups.

Authors:  Sandra N Moses; Melanie L Ostreicher; Jennifer D Ryan
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-05-19

2.  Transitive inference deficits in unaffected biological relatives of schizophrenia patients.

Authors:  Obiora E Onwuameze; Debra Titone; Beng-Choon Ho
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2016-04-03       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Transitive inference in adults with autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Marjorie Solomon; Michael J Frank; Anne C Smith; Stanford Ly; Cameron S Carter
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Category learning in a transitive inference paradigm.

Authors:  Greg Jensen; Tina Kao; Charlotte Michaelcheck; Saani Simms Borge; Vincent P Ferrera; Herbert S Terrace
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-02-09

5.  Internal representation of hierarchical sequences involves the default network.

Authors:  Baxter P Rogers; Suzanne N Avery; Stephan Heckers
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.288

6.  Effects of spatial training on transitive inference performance in humans and rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Regina Paxton Gazes; Olga F Lazareva; Clara N Bergene; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 2.478

7.  Medial temporal lobe memory in childhood: developmental transitions.

Authors:  Elise L Townsend; Jenny L Richmond; Vanessa K Vogel-Farley; Kathleen Thomas
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2010-09-01

8.  The role of the hippocampus in transitive inference.

Authors:  Martin Zalesak; Stephan Heckers
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 3.222

9.  Atypical Learning in Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of Transitive Inference.

Authors:  Marjorie Solomon; J Daniel Ragland; Tara A Niendam; Tyler A Lesh; Jonathan S Beck; John C Matter; Michael J Frank; Cameron S Carter
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 8.829

10.  Reinforcement ambiguity and novelty do not account for transitive inference deficits in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Michael J Coleman; Debra Titone; Olga Krastoshevsky; Verena Krause; Zhuying Huang; Nancy R Mendell; Howard Eichenbaum; Deborah L Levy
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 9.306

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.