Literature DB >> 17703502

Allowing for uncertainty due to missing data in meta-analysis--part 2: hierarchical models.

Ian R White1, Nicky J Welton, Angela M Wood, A E Ades, Julian P T Higgins.   

Abstract

We propose a hierarchical model for the analysis of data from several randomized trials where some outcomes are missing. The degree of departure from a missing-at-random assumption in each arm of each trial is expressed by an informative missing odds ratio (IMOR). We require a realistic prior for the IMORs, including an assessment of the prior correlation between IMORs in different arms and in different trials. The model is fitted by Monte Carlo Markov Chain techniques. By applying the method in three different data sets, we show that it is possible to appropriately capture the extra uncertainty due to missing data, and we discuss in what circumstances it is possible to learn about the IMOR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17703502     DOI: 10.1002/sim.3007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  18 in total

1.  Longitudinal aggregate data model-based meta-analysis with NONMEM: approaches to handling within treatment arm correlation.

Authors:  Jae Eun Ahn; Jonathan L French
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 2.745

2.  Reporting, handling and assessing the risk of bias associated with missing participant data in systematic reviews: a methodological survey.

Authors:  Elie A Akl; Alonso Carrasco-Labra; Romina Brignardello-Petersen; Ignacio Neumann; Bradley C Johnston; Xin Sun; Matthias Briel; Jason W Busse; Shanil Ebrahim; Carlos E Granados; Alfonso Iorio; Affan Irfan; Laura Martínez García; Reem A Mustafa; Anggie Ramírez-Morera; Anna Selva; Ivan Solà; Andrea Juliana Sanabria; Kari A O Tikkinen; Per O Vandvik; Robin W M Vernooij; Oscar E Zazueta; Qi Zhou; Gordon H Guyatt; Pablo Alonso-Coello
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Handling trial participants with missing outcome data when conducting a meta-analysis: a systematic survey of proposed approaches.

Authors:  Elie A Akl; Lara A Kahale; Thomas Agoritsas; Romina Brignardello-Petersen; Jason W Busse; Alonso Carrasco-Labra; Shanil Ebrahim; Bradley C Johnston; Ignacio Neumann; Ivan Sola; Xin Sun; Per Vandvik; Yuqing Zhang; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Gordon Guyatt
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2015-07-23

4.  Integrating multiple data sources (MUDS) for meta-analysis to improve patient-centered outcomes research: a protocol.

Authors:  Evan Mayo-Wilson; Susan Hutfless; Tianjing Li; Gillian Gresham; Nicole Fusco; Jeffrey Ehmsen; James Heyward; Swaroop Vedula; Diana Lock; Jennifer Haythornthwaite; Jennifer L Payne; Theresa Cowley; Elizabeth Tolbert; Lori Rosman; Claire Twose; Elizabeth A Stuart; Hwanhee Hong; Peter Doshi; Catalina Suarez-Cuervo; Sonal Singh; Kay Dickersin
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2015-11-02

5.  Impact of missing participant data for dichotomous outcomes on pooled effect estimates in systematic reviews: a protocol for a methodological study.

Authors:  Elie A Akl; Lara A Kahale; Arnav Agarwal; Nada Al-Matari; Shanil Ebrahim; Paul Elias Alexander; Matthias Briel; Romina Brignardello-Petersen; Jason W Busse; Batoul Diab; Alfonso Iorio; Joey Kwong; Ling Li; Luciane Cruz Lopes; Reem Mustafa; Ignacio Neumann; Kari A O Tikkinen; Per Olav Vandvik; Yuqing Zhang; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Gordon Guyatt
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2014-11-26

6.  Meta-epidemiology.

Authors:  Jong-Myon Bae
Journal:  Epidemiol Health       Date:  2014-09-25

7.  A Bayesian framework to account for uncertainty due to missing binary outcome data in pairwise meta-analysis.

Authors:  N L Turner; S Dias; A E Ades; N J Welton
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Meta-analysis using individual participant data: one-stage and two-stage approaches, and why they may differ.

Authors:  Danielle L Burke; Joie Ensor; Richard D Riley
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-10-16       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Allowing for informative missingness in aggregate data meta-analysis with continuous or binary outcomes: Extensions to metamiss.

Authors:  Anna Chaimani; Dimitris Mavridis; Julian P T Higgins; Georgia Salanti; Ian R White
Journal:  Stata J       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 2.637

Review 10.  Get real in individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis: a review of the methodology.

Authors:  Thomas P A Debray; Karel G M Moons; Gert van Valkenhoef; Orestis Efthimiou; Noemi Hummel; Rolf H H Groenwold; Johannes B Reitsma
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 5.273

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.