Literature DB >> 17702958

Randomized trial of intraarterial infusion of urokinase within 6 hours of middle cerebral artery stroke: the middle cerebral artery embolism local fibrinolytic intervention trial (MELT) Japan.

Akira Ogawa1, Etsuro Mori, Kazuo Minematsu, Waro Taki, Akira Takahashi, Shigeru Nemoto, Susumu Miyamoto, Makoto Sasaki, Takashi Inoue.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: The Middle Cerebral Artery Embolism Local Fibrinolytic Intervention Trial (MELT) Japan was organized to determine the safety and clinical efficacy of intraarterial infusion of urokinase (UK) in patients with stroke within 6 hours of onset.
METHODS: Patients with ischemic stroke presenting within 6 hours of onset and displaying occlusions of the M1 or M2 portion of the middle cerebral artery on carotid angiography were randomized to the UK or control groups. Clinical outcome was assessed by the modified Rankin Scale, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, and Barthel Index.
RESULTS: The Independent Monitoring Committee recommended stopping the trial after approval of intravenous infusion of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in Japan. A total of 114 patients underwent randomization, 57 patients in each group. Background characteristics were comparable between the 2 groups. The primary end point of favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale 0 to 2) at 90 days was somewhat more frequent in the UK group than in the control group (49.1% and 38.6%, OR: 1.54, 95% CI: 0.73 to 3.23) but did not reach a significant level (P=0.345). However, excellent functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale 0 to 1) at 90 days, a preplanned secondary end point, was more frequent in the UK group than in the control group (42.1% and 22.8%, P=0.045, OR: 2.46, 95% CI: 1.09 to 5.54). There were significantly more patients with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale 0 or 1 at 90 days in the UK group than the control group (P=0.017). The 90-day cumulative mortality was 5.3% in the UK group and 3.5% in the control group (P=1.000), and intracerebral hemorrhage within 24 hours of treatment occurred in 9% and 2%, respectively (P=0.206).
CONCLUSIONS: The trial was aborted prematurely and the primary end point did not reach statistical significance. Nevertheless, the secondary analyses suggested that intraarterial fibrinolysis has the potential to increase the likelihood of excellent functional outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17702958     DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.488551

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  122 in total

Review 1.  Recanalization therapy for acute ischemic stroke, part 1: surgical embolectomy and chemical thrombolysis.

Authors:  Saeed Ansari; Maryam Rahman; Michael F Waters; Brian L Hoh; J Mocco
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 2.  Intra-arterial thrombectomy: does invasive treatment lead to better outcomes than intravenous thrombolysis alone?

Authors:  Laurel Cherian; Shawna Cutting; Sarah Song
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Angiographic outcome of endovascular stroke therapy correlated with MR findings, infarct growth, and clinical outcome in the DEFUSE 2 trial.

Authors:  Michael P Marks; Maarten G Lansberg; Michael Mlynash; Stephanie Kemp; Ryan A McTaggart; Greg Zaharchuk; Roland Bammer; Gregory W Albers
Journal:  Int J Stroke       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 5.266

4.  Antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy for ischemic stroke: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Maarten G Lansberg; Martin J O'Donnell; Pooja Khatri; Eddy S Lang; Mai N Nguyen-Huynh; Neil E Schwartz; Frank A Sonnenberg; Sam Schulman; Per Olav Vandvik; Frederick A Spencer; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Gordon H Guyatt; Elie A Akl
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  Outcome in acute stroke with different intra-arterial infusion rate of urokinase on thrombolysis.

Authors:  X Gan; Y Luo; F Ling; X Ji; J Chen; Y Ding
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 1.610

Review 6.  Intravenous rt-PA versus endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Pitchaiah Mandava; Jose I Suarez; Thomas A Kent
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.113

7.  Perfusion-diffusion mismatch: does it identify who will benefit from reperfusion therapy?

Authors:  William J Powers
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 6.829

8.  A Combined Treatment with Taurine and Intra-arterial Thrombolysis in an Embolic Model of Stroke in Rats: Increased Neuroprotective Efficacy and Extended Therapeutic Time Window.

Authors:  Weihua Guan; Yumei Zhao; Chao Xu
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 6.829

9.  Endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Alfonso Ciccone; Luca Valvassori; Michele Nichelatti; Annalisa Sgoifo; Michela Ponzio; Roberto Sterzi; Edoardo Boccardi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  An Outcome Model for Intravenous rt-PA in Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Pitchaiah Mandava; Shreyansh D Shah; Anand K Sarma; Thomas A Kent
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 6.829

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.