Bevin Gangadharan1, Robin Antrobus, Raymond A Dwek, Nicole Zitzmann. 1. Oxford Antiviral Drug Discovery Unit, Oxford Glycobiology Institute, Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. Bevin.Gangadharan@bioch.ox.ac.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Liver biopsy is currently the gold standard for assessing liver fibrosis, and no reliable noninvasive diagnostic approach is available. Therefore a suitable serologic biomarker of liver fibrosis is urgently needed. METHODS: We used a proteomics method based on 2-dimensional gel electrophoresis to identify potential fibrosis biomarkers. Serum samples from patients with varying degrees of hepatic scarring induced by infection with the hepatitis C virus (HCV) were analyzed and compared with serum from healthy controls. RESULTS: We observed the most prominent differences when we compared serum samples from cirrhotic patients with healthy control serum. Inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitor heavy chain H4 (ITIH4) fragments, alpha1 antichymotrypsin, apolipoprotein L1 (Apo L1), prealbumin, albumin, paraoxonase/arylesterase 1, and zinc-alpha2-glycoprotein were decreased in cirrhotic serum, whereas CD5 antigen-like protein (CD5L) and beta2 glycoprotein I (beta2GPI) were increased. In general, alpha2 macroglobulin (a2M) and immunoglobulin components increased with hepatic fibrosis, whereas haptoglobin and complement components (C3, C4, and factor H-related protein 1) decreased. Novel proteins associated with HCV-induced fibrosis included ITIH4 fragments, complement factor H-related protein 1, CD5L, Apo L1, beta2GPI, and thioester-cleaved products of a2M. CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of hepatic scarring may be performed with a combination of these novel fibrosis biomarkers, thus eliminating the need for liver biopsy. Further evaluation of these candidate markers needs to be performed in larger patient populations. Diagnosis of fibrosis during early stages will allow early treatment, thereby preventing fibrosis progression.
BACKGROUND: Liver biopsy is currently the gold standard for assessing liver fibrosis, and no reliable noninvasive diagnostic approach is available. Therefore a suitable serologic biomarker of liver fibrosis is urgently needed. METHODS: We used a proteomics method based on 2-dimensional gel electrophoresis to identify potential fibrosis biomarkers. Serum samples from patients with varying degrees of hepatic scarring induced by infection with the hepatitis C virus (HCV) were analyzed and compared with serum from healthy controls. RESULTS: We observed the most prominent differences when we compared serum samples from cirrhotic patients with healthy control serum. Inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitor heavy chain H4 (ITIH4) fragments, alpha1 antichymotrypsin, apolipoprotein L1 (Apo L1), prealbumin, albumin, paraoxonase/arylesterase 1, and zinc-alpha2-glycoprotein were decreased in cirrhotic serum, whereas CD5 antigen-like protein (CD5L) and beta2 glycoprotein I (beta2GPI) were increased. In general, alpha2 macroglobulin (a2M) and immunoglobulin components increased with hepatic fibrosis, whereas haptoglobin and complement components (C3, C4, and factor H-related protein 1) decreased. Novel proteins associated with HCV-induced fibrosis included ITIH4 fragments, complement factor H-related protein 1, CD5L, Apo L1, beta2GPI, and thioester-cleaved products of a2M. CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of hepatic scarring may be performed with a combination of these novel fibrosis biomarkers, thus eliminating the need for liver biopsy. Further evaluation of these candidate markers needs to be performed in larger patient populations. Diagnosis of fibrosis during early stages will allow early treatment, thereby preventing fibrosis progression.
Authors: N E El-Bassiouni; M M F Nosseir; M E Madkour; M M K Zoheiry; I W Bekheit; R A Ibrahim; I M Ibrahim; A E El Bassiouny Journal: Mol Biol Rep Date: 2012-02-09 Impact factor: 2.316
Authors: Dana Lau-Corona; Luís Alberto Pineda; Héctor Hugo Avilés; Gabriela Gutiérrez-Reyes; Blanca Eugenia Farfan-Labonne; Rafael Núñez-Nateras; Alan Bonder; Rosalinda Martínez-García; Clara Corona-Lau; Marco Antonio Olivera-Martínez; Maria-Concepción Gutiérrez-Ruiz; Guillermo Robles-Díaz; David Kershenobich Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2009-06-07 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: J Huang; W Shi; J Zhang; J W Chou; R S Paules; K Gerrish; J Li; J Luo; R D Wolfinger; W Bao; T-M Chu; Y Nikolsky; T Nikolskaya; D Dosymbekov; M O Tsyganova; L Shi; X Fan; J C Corton; M Chen; Y Cheng; W Tong; H Fang; P R Bushel Journal: Pharmacogenomics J Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 3.550
Authors: Joe Gray; Dipankar Chattopadhyay; Gary S Beale; Gillian L Patman; Luca Miele; Barry P King; Stephen Stewart; Mark Hudson; Christopher P Day; Derek M Manas; Helen L Reeves Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2009-08-05 Impact factor: 4.430