Literature DB >> 17701926

Blind puncture in comparison with fluoroscopic guidance in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a randomized controlled trial.

Abbas Basiri1, Sadrollah Mehrabi, Hamidreza Kianian, Ahmad Javaherforooshzadeh.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Our aim was to evaluate blind puncture in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for decreasing the risk of radiation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred candidates for PCNL were randomly assigned into 2 groups. Blind access was performed for the patients in group 1 and the standard access using fluoroscopy for those in group 2. In group 1, displacement of the targeted calyx in the prone position was estimated by fluoroscopy comparing to the image on intravenous urography. Puncture of the calyx was attempted 3 cm to 4 cm below the marked site of the targeted calyx with a 30 angle. If the access to the collecting system was felt and urine came out, the site of puncture would be controlled by fluoroscopy. If the access failed, we would repeat puncturing up to 5 times.
RESULTS: The mean time to access was 6.6 +/- 2.1 minutes and 5.5 +/- 1.7 minutes in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P = .008). The mean time of radiation exposure was 0.95 +/- 0.44 minutes in group 2. A successful puncture to the targeted calyx was achieved in 50% and 90% of the patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P < .001) and a successful calculus removal in 62% and 100% of the patients in groups 1 and 2 (P < .001).
CONCLUSION: Although about half of the patients benefited from blind access in our study, this technique can not be solely relied on, and fluoroscopy or ultrasonography should be available for prevention of complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17701926

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol J        ISSN: 1735-1308            Impact factor:   1.510


  8 in total

Review 1.  Supine versus prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney calculi: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Peng Wu; Li Wang; Kunjie Wang
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Comparison of the safety and efficacy of one-shot and telescopic metal dilatation in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Shahriar Amirhassani; Seyed Habibollah Mousavi-Bahar; Abdolmajid Iloon Kashkouli; Saadat Torabian
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2014-02-16       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 3.  Research progress of percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Chao Wei; Yucong Zhang; Gaurab Pokhrel; Xiaming Liu; Jiahua Gan; Xiao Yu; Zhangqun Ye; Shaogang Wang
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  The feasibility of regional anesthesia in the percutaneous nephrolithotomy with supracostal approach and its comparison with general anesthesia.

Authors:  M K Moslemi; S H Mousavi-Bahar; M Abedinzadeh
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Clinical application of percutaneous nephrostomy in some urologic diseases.

Authors:  Hongbo Luo; Xiuheng Liu; Tianpeng Wu; Xiaobin Zhang
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2008-08-15

6.  Monoplanar access technique for percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Namık Kemal Hatipoglu; Mehmet Nuri Bodakci; Necmettin Penbegül; Yaşar Bozkurt; Ahmet Ali Sancaktutar; Murat Atar; Haluk Söylemez
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-04-07       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  Percutaneous nephrostomy for symptomatic hypermobile kidney: a single centre experience.

Authors:  Radosław Starownik; Tomasz Golabek; Krzysztof Bar; Kamil Muc; Paweł Płaza; Piotr Chlosta
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 1.195

8.  Modern management of stone disease in patients with a solitary kidney.

Authors:  Maciej Kupajski; Michał Tkocz; Damian Ziaja
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 1.195

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.