Literature DB >> 17701114

[Geriatric health promotion and prevention for independently living senior citizens: programmes and target groups].

U Dapp1, J Anders, H P Meier-Baumgartner, W v Renteln-Kruse.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nearly all diseases in old age that are epidemiologically important can be reduced or prevented successfully through consequent changes in individual lifestyle, a systematic provision of measures in primary prevention (i.e. vaccination programmes) and the creation of health promoting settings. However, at the moment the amount of potential for preventative interventions is neither systematically nor sufficiently utilised in Germany.
METHODS: Two different preventative approaches: a) multidimensional advice session in small groups through an interdisciplinary team at a geriatric centre (seniors come to seek advice offered at a centre) or b) multidimensional advice at the seniors home through one member of the interdisciplinary team from the geriatric centre (expert takes advice to seniors home) were tested simultaneously with a well-described study sample of 804 independent community-dwelling senior citizens aged 60 years or over, without need of care and cognitive impairments recruited from general practices. Information about target group specific approaches in health promotion and prevention for senior citizens were retrieved from analyses of sociodemographic, medical, psychological and spacial characteristics of this study sample.
RESULTS: The majority of the study sample (580 out of 804 or 72.1%) decided to participate: a) 86.7% (503 out of 580) attended at the geriatric centre and sought advice in group sessions and b) 13.3% (77 out of 580) decided to receive advice in a preventive home visit. A total of 224 seniors (224 out of 804 or 27.9%) refused to participate at all. These three target groups were characterised on the basis of their age, gender, education, social background, health status, health behaviour, use of preventive care, self perceived health, functional disabilities, social net and social participation and distance or accessibility of preventative approaches. The 503 senior citizens who participated in small group sessions at the geriatric centre were characterised as "investors into their health resources". They were mobile and participated actively in their environment. They were open for health promoting advice and capable of understanding and incorporating it into their daily routines (health literacy). Those 224 seniors who refused any participation were characterised as "consumers of their health resources". They did not differ in age and gender from the health investors, but showed less self-efficacy and less self-responsibility and typical behaviour that endangers health in an active way, i.e. smokers or in a passive way, i.e. low physical activity. The 77 seniors who received a preventive home visit were characterised as "people with exhausted health resources". Their mobility was clearly restricted and autonomy was confined to their home environment. This group represented frail elderly people with many risk factors in different domains.
CONCLUSION: The strongest reason to refuse participation in health promoting programmes was the personal attitude related to one's own personal health. Taking account of needs and wants of the seniors who refused to participate more people expressed the reason "no interest" in the preventive home visit than in the small group session at the geriatric centre. To strengthen the integration of the GP as a trustworthy person would seem to be more successful to motivate senior citizens to participate in health promoting and preventative programmes in the future. This could succeed in a cooperation with geriatric centres to establish community centres for generally healthy senior citizens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17701114     DOI: 10.1007/s00391-007-0469-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr        ISSN: 0948-6704            Impact factor:   1.281


  3 in total

1.  [Development of geriatrics in Germany].

Authors:  T Uhlig
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.281

2.  [Preventative home visits by a specially trained nurse for 60-year olds and elderly in Hamburg].

Authors:  W von Renteln-Kruse; J Anders; U Dapp; H P Meier-Baumgartner
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.281

3.  Development, feasibility and performance of a health risk appraisal questionnaire for older persons.

Authors:  Andreas E Stuck; Kalpa Kharicha; Ulrike Dapp; Jennifer Anders; Wolfgang von Renteln-Kruse; Hans Peter Meier-Baumgartner; Danielle Harari; Cameron G Swift; Katja Ivanova; Matthias Egger; Gerhard Gillmann; Jerilyn Higa; John C Beck; Steve Iliffe
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 4.615

  3 in total
  8 in total

1.  [Resources and risks in old age: the LUCAS-I marker set for a classification of elderly people as fit, pre-frail and frail. First results on validity from the Longitudinal Urban Cohort Ageing Study (LUCAS), Hamburg].

Authors:  U Dapp; J Anders; S Golgert; W von Renteln-Kruse; C E Minder
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.281

2.  [Expectations and attitudes concerning geriatric counseling : Results of a survey among general practitioners and hospital-based providers in two German states].

Authors:  H Burkhardt; C Trojan
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 1.281

3.  [Health and competence: detection and decoding using comprehensive assessments in the Longitudinal Urban Cohort Ageing Study (LUCAS)].

Authors:  J Anders; F Pröfener; U Dapp; S Golgert; A Daubmann; K Wegscheider; W von Renteln-Kruse; C E Minder
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.281

Review 4.  [Skin health promotion in the elderly].

Authors:  J Kottner; A Lichterfeld; U Blume-Peytavi; A Kuhlmey
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.281

5.  [Acceptance of preventive home visits among frail elderly persons : Participants an non-participants in a Follow-up after 2 and 4 years within the LUCAS longitudinal study].

Authors:  F Pröfener; J Anders; U Dapp; C E Minder; S Golgert; W von Renteln-Kruse
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 1.281

Review 6.  [Effectiveness of "Active health promotion in old age" : Results regarding compression of morbidity by target groups in 13.8 years of observation in LUCAS].

Authors:  Ulrike Dapp; Christoph Minder; Lilli Neumann; Stefan Golgert; Björn Klugmann; Wolfgang von Renteln-Kruse
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 1.281

Review 7.  [Medication and falls in old age].

Authors:  M K Modreker; W von Renteln-Kruse
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 0.743

8.  Effects of an exercise programme for chronically ill and mobility-restricted elderly with structured support by the general practitioner's practice (HOMEfit) - study protocol of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Timo Hinrichs; Anna Moschny; Michael Brach; Stefan Wilm; Renate Klaaßen-Mielke; Matthias Trampisch; Petra Platen
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 2.279

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.