Literature DB >> 17700066

DNA damage response as an anti-cancer barrier: damage threshold and the concept of 'conditional haploinsufficiency'.

Jiri Bartek1, Jiri Lukas, Jirina Bartkova.   

Abstract

DNA damage response (DDR) emerges as a biological tumorigenesis barrier in early stages of cancer development, and a selective pressure that favors outgrowth of malignant clones with defects in the genome maintenance machinery, such as mutations of p53 and other DDR components. Recent studies indicate that the DDR barrier is not alarmed universally among early noninvasive lesions, but rather responds to high-risk tumorigenic threats that occur in high-grade, pre-malignant lesions that are generally more likely to develop into bona fide malignancies. In addition, while the DDR barrier appears to operate in major types of cancer, such as carcinomas of the lung, breast and colon, DDR activation is rare at any stage of progression among testicular germ-cell tumors. Together with observations that several, but not all oncogenic insults are capable of activating the DDR machinery, these new results point to existence of a critical threshold of such oncogene-induced DNA damage. It seems that only cells and lesions that experience DNA replication stress and DNA damage above such threshold activate the cellular senescence or cell death pathways within the DDR machinery. The higher load of DNA damage may also contribute to cancer predisposition in families with inherited heterozygous defects in the DDR barrier, such as in ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, p53 and other genes. We propose that carriers of such DDR defects may be more prone to malignancy due to 'conditional haploinsufficiency': such partial defects may be asymptomatic in normal tissues, yet they may become manifest under conditions of supra-threshold endogenous DNA damage in oncogene-driven pre-malignant lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17700066     DOI: 10.4161/cc.6.19.4754

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Cycle        ISSN: 1551-4005            Impact factor:   4.534


  65 in total

1.  Thresholds of replication stress signaling in cancer development and treatment.

Authors:  Jiri Bartek; Martin Mistrik; Jirina Bartkova
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 15.369

2.  Posttranscriptional regulation of miRNAs in the DNA damage response.

Authors:  Xinna Zhang; Xiongbin Lu
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 4.652

Review 3.  Haploinsufficiency in mouse models of DNA repair deficiency: modifiers of penetrance.

Authors:  Diane C Cabelof
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 9.261

4.  CD47 Receptor Globally Regulates Metabolic Pathways That Control Resistance to Ionizing Radiation.

Authors:  Thomas W Miller; David R Soto-Pantoja; Anthony L Schwartz; John M Sipes; William G DeGraff; Lisa A Ridnour; David A Wink; David D Roberts
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Protein kinase C β inhibition by enzastaurin leads to mitotic missegregation and preferential cytotoxicity toward colorectal cancer cells with chromosomal instability (CIN).

Authors:  Djamila Ouaret; Annette K Larsen
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.534

6.  Establishment of primary mouse lung adenocarcinoma cell culture.

Authors:  Shuli Luo; Mei Sun; Rui Jiang; Guan Wang; Xinyi Zhang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2011-05-09       Impact factor: 2.967

7.  DNA damage response to the Mdm2 inhibitor nutlin-3.

Authors:  Rajeev Verma; Marc J Rigatti; Glenn S Belinsky; Cassandra A Godman; Charles Giardina
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 5.858

8.  Hemizygosity for Atm and Brca1 influence the balance between cell transformation and apoptosis.

Authors:  Fengtao Su; Lubomir B Smilenov; Thomas Ludwig; Libin Zhou; Jiayun Zhu; Guangming Zhou; Eric J Hall
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  Elevated levels of the polo kinase Cdc5 override the Mec1/ATR checkpoint in budding yeast by acting at different steps of the signaling pathway.

Authors:  Roberto Antonio Donnianni; Matteo Ferrari; Federico Lazzaro; Michela Clerici; Benjamin Tamilselvan Nachimuthu; Paolo Plevani; Marco Muzi-Falconi; Achille Pellicioli
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Modeling the role of p53 pulses in DNA damage- induced cell death decision.

Authors:  Tingzhe Sun; Chun Chen; Yuanyuan Wu; Shuai Zhang; Jun Cui; Pingping Shen
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-06-22       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.