Literature DB >> 17700050

Combined brief dynamic therapy and pharmacotherapy in the treatment of major depressive disorder: a pilot study.

Giuseppe Maina1, Gianluca Rosso, Chiara Crespi, Filippo Bogetto.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The relative efficacy of supplemental psychotherapy in the treatment of depression is still a matter of debate. Moreover, the superiority of brief dynamic therapy (BDT) over supportive psychotherapies is not well established. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of BDT added to medication with that of brief supportive psychotherapy (BSP) added to medication in the treatment of major depressive disorder.
METHOD: A 12-month randomized clinical trial compared BDT (n = 18) with BSP (n = 17) combined with antidepressants in outpatients with major depressive disorder. Both psychotherapies were added during the first 6 months of the trial; all patients continued to be treated with only pharmacotherapy (paroxetine or citalopram) in the following 6-month continuation phase. Efficacy was assessed using the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety and the Clinical Global Impression (CGI). The data analysis was conducted on two samples: the per-protocol (PP) sample and the observed-cases (OC) sample.
RESULTS: Thirty-two patients completed the study. Although at the end of the combined therapies (T2) no differences emerged between the two treatment approaches, the group of patients treated with BDT showed a further clinical improvement at the end of the study (T3): a significant reduction in symptomatology emerged on the HAM-D (PP sample: F = 75.154, p = 0.03; OC sample: F = 67.149, p = 0.022) and on the CGI total scores (PP sample: F = 78.527, p = 0.016; OC sample: F = 74.104, p = 0.007). The difference in remission rates on the HAM-D (75 vs. 12.5% at T3) is statistically significant favoring BDT.
CONCLUSIONS: BDT combined with antidepressants is preferable to supportive psychotherapy combined with medication in the treatment of outpatients with major depression. 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17700050     DOI: 10.1159/000104706

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychother Psychosom        ISSN: 0033-3190            Impact factor:   17.659


  4 in total

1.  Sensitivity to change and predictive validity of the MOODS-SR questionnaire, last-month version.

Authors:  Mario Miniati; Paola Rucci; Ellen Frank; Annalisa Oppo; David J Kupfer; Andrea Fagiolini; Giovanni B Cassano
Journal:  Psychother Psychosom       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 17.659

Review 2.  Day hospital programmes for eating disorders: a review of the similarities, differences and goals.

Authors:  G Abbate-Daga; C Gramaglia; S Preda; E Comba; A Brustolin; S Fassino
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2009 Jun-Sep       Impact factor: 4.652

Review 3.  A review of empirically supported psychological therapies for mood disorders in adults.

Authors:  Steven D Hollon; Kathryn Ponniah
Journal:  Depress Anxiety       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 6.505

4.  Identifying the most suitable treatment for depression based on patients' attachment: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial of supportive-expressive vs. supportive treatments.

Authors:  Sigal Zilcha-Mano; Tohar Dolev; Liat Leibovich; Jacques P Barber
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 3.630

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.