Literature DB >> 17699453

Hemofiltration of recombinant hirudin by different hemodialyzer membranes: implications for clinical use.

Kerstin Benz1, Matthias A Nauck, Joachim Böhler, Karl-Georg Fischer.   

Abstract

Recombinant hirudin (lepirudin) is a potent direct thrombin inhibitor that is used particularly for treatment of immune-mediated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Because hirudin is almost exclusively eliminated by the kidneys, its half-life is markedly prolonged in patients with severe renal insufficiency. Therefore, these patients are at risk for bleeding, particularly because no antidote is available. To use hirudin safely in patients who are on renal replacement therapy, knowledge of hirudin-sieving characteristics of different hemodialyzers is required. Data on this issue are sparse and in part contradictory. Eight different conventional low-flux and high-flux hemodialyzers were tested in an in vitro circuit with ultrafiltrate reinfusion. In each experiment, lepirudin concentration was repetitively measured during 3 h in the prefilter, the postfilter, and the filtration line using a chromogenic assay. On the basis of these data, sieving coefficients were calculated. All high-flux hemodialyzers tested allowed filtration of hirudin yet with marked differences in steady-state sieving (sieving coefficients in whole blood: polysulfone [PS] 0.97 +/- 0.03; polymethylmethacrylate [PMMA] 0.75 +/- 0.02; polyarylethersulfone 0.73 +/- 0.02; polyamide 0.49 +/- 0.02). None of the low-flux hemodialyzer membranes tested (cuprophane, hemophane, PS, and PMMA) showed significant hirudin filtration. Owing to marked differences in hirudin-sieving characteristics, choice of the appropriate hemodialyzer membrane is an important determinant of bleeding risk in dialysis-dependent patients who are treated with hirudin. In case of overdosage or bleeding complications, hemofiltration via PS membranes is recommended to reduce plasma hirudin concentration. Hirudin dosage should be adapted not only to the clinical situation but also to the hirudin-sieving characteristics of the assigned dialyzer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17699453     DOI: 10.2215/CJN.02550706

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1555-9041            Impact factor:   8.237


  6 in total

Review 1.  What are the anticoagulation options for intermittent hemodialysis?

Authors:  Andrew Davenport
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 2.  [Old and new anticoagulants. Antidotes and measures for acute hemorrhaging and urgent interventions].

Authors:  M Lancé; B Stessel; K Hamulyák; M A Marcus
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 3.  Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a renal perspective.

Authors:  Samaha Syed; Robert F Reilly
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 4.  Alternatives to standard unfractionated heparin for pediatric hemodialysis treatments.

Authors:  Andrew Davenport
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 5.  Clinical review: use of renal replacement therapies in special groups of ICU patients.

Authors:  Eric A J Hoste; Annemieke Dhondt
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 9.097

6.  The efficacy and safety of Hirudin plus Aspirin versus Warfarin in the secondary prevention of Cardioembolic Stroke due to Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A multicenter prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Chang-Geng Song; Li-Jie Bi; Jing-Jing Zhao; Xuan Wang; Wen Li; Fang Yang; Wen Jiang
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 3.738

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.