Literature DB >> 17698940

Relative efficiency of unequal cluster sizes for variance component estimation in cluster randomized and multicentre trials.

Gerard Jp van Breukelen1, Math Jjm Candel, Martijn Pf Berger.   

Abstract

Cluster randomized and multicentre trials evaluate the effect of a treatment on persons nested within clusters, for instance patients within clinics or pupils within schools. Although equal sample sizes per cluster are generally optimal for parameter estimation, they are rarely feasible. This paper addresses the relative efficiency (RE) of unequal versus equal cluster sizes for estimating variance components in cluster randomized trials and in multicentre trials with person randomization within centres, assuming a quantitative outcome. Starting from maximum likelihood estimation, the RE is investigated numerically for a range of cluster size distributions. An approximate formula is presented for computing the RE as a function of the mean and variance of cluster sizes and the intraclass correlation. The accuracy of this approximation is checked and found to be good. It is concluded that the loss of efficiency for variance component estimation due to variation of cluster sizes rarely exceeds 20% and can be compensated by sampling 25% more clusters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17698940     DOI: 10.1177/0962280206079018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res        ISSN: 0962-2802            Impact factor:   3.021


  6 in total

1.  Sample Size Calculation for Count Outcomes in Cluster Randomization Trials with Varying Cluster Sizes.

Authors:  Jijia Wang; Song Zhang; Chul Ahn
Journal:  Commun Stat Theory Methods       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 0.893

2.  Relative efficiency of equal versus unequal cluster sizes in cluster randomized trials with a small number of clusters.

Authors:  Jingxia Liu; Chengjie Xiong; Lei Liu; Guoqiao Wang; Luo Jingqin; Feng Gao; Ling Chen; Yan Li
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 1.051

3.  Comparing methods to estimate treatment effects on a continuous outcome in multicentre randomized controlled trials: a simulation study.

Authors:  Rong Chu; Lehana Thabane; Jinhui Ma; Anne Holbrook; Eleanor Pullenayegum; Philip James Devereaux
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-02-21       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  Optimising decision making on illness absenteeism due to fever and common infections within childcare centres: development of a multicomponent intervention and study protocol of a cluster randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  K K B Peetoom; R Crutzen; J M H A Bohnen; R Verhoeven; H J M G Nelissen-Vrancken; B Winkens; G J Dinant; J W L Cals
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Early detection of health problems in potentially frail community-dwelling older people by general practices--project [G]OLD: design of a longitudinal, quasi-experimental study.

Authors:  Mandy M N Stijnen; Inge G P Duimel-Peeters; Maria W J Jansen; Hubertus J M Vrijhoef
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 3.921

6.  The Healthy Primary School of the Future: study protocol of a quasi-experimental study.

Authors:  M Willeboordse; M W Jansen; S N van den Heijkant; A Simons; B Winkens; R H M de Groot; N Bartelink; S P Kremers; P van Assema; H H Savelberg; E de Neubourg; L Borghans; T Schils; K M Coppens; R Dietvorst; R Ten Hoopen; F Coomans; S Klosse; M H J Conjaerts; M Oosterhoff; M A Joore; I Ferreira; P Muris; H Bosma; H L Toppenberg; C P van Schayck
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 3.295

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.