Literature DB >> 17698804

Phase III trial of high-dose sequential chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cell support compared with standard dose chemotherapy for first-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: intergroup trial of the AGO-Ovar/AIO and EBMT.

Volker Möbus1, Hannes Wandt, Norbert Frickhofen, Carmelo Bengala, Kim Champion, Rainer Kimmig, Helmut Ostermann, Axel Hinke, Jonathan A Ledermann.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Although ovarian cancer is one of the most chemotherapy-sensitive solid tumors, cure after radical surgery and chemotherapy is uncommon. A randomized trial comparing high-dose sequential chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) support with platinum-based combination chemotherapy was conducted to investigate whether dose-intensification improves outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred forty-nine patients with untreated ovarian cancer were randomly assigned after debulking surgery to receive standard combination chemotherapy or sequential high-dose (HD) treatment with two cycles of cyclophosphamide and paclitaxel followed by three cycles of HD carboplatin and paclitaxel with PBSC support. HD melphalan was added to the final cycle. The median age was 50 years (range, 20 to 65 years) and International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage was IIb/IIc in 4%, III in 78%, and IV in 17%.
RESULTS: Seventy-six percent of patients received all five cycles in the HD arm and the main toxicities were neuro-/ototoxicity, gastrointestinal toxicity, and infection and one death from hemorrhagic shock. After a median follow-up of 38 months, the progression-free survival was 20.5 months in the standard arm and 29.6 months in the HD arm (hazard ratio [HR], 0.84; 95% CI, 0.56 to 1.26; P, .40). Median overall survival (OS) was 62.8 months in the standard arm and 54.4 months in the HD arm (HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.94; P, .54).
CONCLUSION: This is the first randomized trial comparing sequential HD versus standard dose chemotherapy in first-line treatment of patients with advanced ovarian cancer. We observed no statistically significant difference in progression-free survival or OS and conclude that HD chemotherapy does not appear to be superior to conventional dose chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17698804     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.7527

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  23 in total

1.  High-dose etoposide: from phase I to a component of curative therapy.

Authors:  Steven N Wolff; John D Hainsworth; F Anthony Greco
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-10-06       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Trial-level analysis of progression-free survival and response rate as end points of trials of first-line chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Giuseppe Colloca; Antonella Venturino
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  S3-Guideline on Diagnostics, Therapy and Follow-up of Malignant Ovarian Tumours: Short version 1.0 - AWMF registration number: 032/035OL, June 2013.

Authors:  U Wagner; P Harter; F Hilpert; S Mahner; A Reuß; A du Bois; E Petru; W Meier; P Ortner; K König; K Lindel; D Grab; P Piso; O Ortmann; I Runnebaum; J Pfisterer; D Lüftner; N Frickhofen; F Grünwald; B O Maier; J Diebold; S Hauptmann; F Kommoss; G Emons; B Radeleff; M Gebhardt; N Arnold; G Calaminus; I Weisse; J Weis; J Sehouli; D Fink; A Burges; A Hasenburg; C Eggert
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.915

4.  Statement of the AGO Kommission Ovar, AGO Study Group, NOGGO, AGO Austria and AGO Switzerland Regarding the Use of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) in Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  P Harter; A du Bois; S Mahner; J Pfisterer; O Ortmann; C Marth; D Fink; F Hilpert; U Wagner; J Sehouli
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.915

5.  Advanced ovarian cancer: what should be the standard of care?

Authors:  Barbara A Goff
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 4.401

Review 6.  Pharmaceutical management of ovarian cancer : current status.

Authors:  Maurie Markman
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Intraepithelial T cells and tumor proliferation: impact on the benefit from surgical cytoreduction in advanced serous ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Sarah F Adams; Douglas A Levine; Mark G Cadungog; Rachel Hammond; Andrea Facciabene; Narciso Olvera; Stephen C Rubin; Jeff Boyd; Phyllis A Gimotty; George Coukos
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Encapsulation in nanoparticles improves anti-cancer efficacy of carboplatin.

Authors:  Tanmoy Sadhukha; Swayam Prabha
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 3.246

9.  Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia as a prognostic factor in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results from Japan Multinational Trial Organization LC00-03.

Authors:  Y Kishida; M Kawahara; S Teramukai; K Kubota; K Komuta; K Minato; T Mio; Y Fujita; T Yonei; K Nakano; M Tsuboi; K Shibata; S Atagi; T Kawaguchi; K Furuse; M Fukushima
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Phase I trial of autologous hematopoietic SCT with escalating doses of topotecan combined with CY and carboplatin in patients with relapsed or persistent ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma.

Authors:  M R Litzow; P P Peethambaram; S L Safgren; G L Keeney; S M Ansell; A Dispenzieri; M A Elliott; D A Gastineau; M A Gertz; D J Inwards; M Q Lacy; I N M Micallef; L F Porrata; W L Lingle; L C Hartmann; M H Frost; B A Barrette; H J Long; V J Suman; J M Reid; M M Ames; S H Kaufmann
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 5.483

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.