BACKGROUND: In most patients, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) represents the clinically evident prodromal phase of dementia. This is most well established in amnestic MCI, which is most commonly a precursor to Alzheimer disease (AD). It follows, however, that subjects with MCI who have impairment in nonmemory domains may progress to non-AD degenerative dementias. OBJECTIVE: To investigate patterns of cerebral atrophy associated with specific subtypes of MCI. DESIGN: Case-control study. SETTING: Community-based sample at a tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: One hundred forty-five subjects with MCI and 145 age- and sex-matched cognitively normal control subjects. Mild cognitive impairment was classified as amnestic, single cognitive domain; amnestic, multiple domain; nonamnestic, single domain; and nonamnestic, multiple domain. Subjects with nonamnestic single-domain MCI were classified into language, attention/executive, and visuospatial subgroups on the basis of specific cognitive impairment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Patterns of gray matter loss in the MCI groups compared with control subjects, assessed using voxel-based morphometry. RESULTS: Subjects in the amnestic single- and multiple-domain groups showed loss in the medial and inferior temporal lobes compared with control subjects, and those in the multiple-domain group also had involvement of the posterior temporal lobe, parietal association cortex, and posterior cingulate. Subjects in the nonamnestic single-domain group with language impairment showed loss in the left anterior inferior temporal lobe. The group with attention/executive deficits showed loss in the basal forebrain and hypothalamus. No coherent patterns of loss were observed in the other subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: The pattern of atrophy in the amnestic MCI groups is consistent with the concept that MCI in most of these subjects represents prodromal AD. However, the varying patterns in the language and attention/executive subgroups suggest that these subjects may have a different underlying disorder.
BACKGROUND: In most patients, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) represents the clinically evident prodromal phase of dementia. This is most well established in amnestic MCI, which is most commonly a precursor to Alzheimer disease (AD). It follows, however, that subjects with MCI who have impairment in nonmemory domains may progress to non-AD degenerative dementias. OBJECTIVE: To investigate patterns of cerebral atrophy associated with specific subtypes of MCI. DESIGN: Case-control study. SETTING: Community-based sample at a tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: One hundred forty-five subjects with MCI and 145 age- and sex-matched cognitively normal control subjects. Mild cognitive impairment was classified as amnestic, single cognitive domain; amnestic, multiple domain; nonamnestic, single domain; and nonamnestic, multiple domain. Subjects with nonamnestic single-domain MCI were classified into language, attention/executive, and visuospatial subgroups on the basis of specific cognitive impairment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Patterns of gray matter loss in the MCI groups compared with control subjects, assessed using voxel-based morphometry. RESULTS: Subjects in the amnestic single- and multiple-domain groups showed loss in the medial and inferior temporal lobes compared with control subjects, and those in the multiple-domain group also had involvement of the posterior temporal lobe, parietal association cortex, and posterior cingulate. Subjects in the nonamnestic single-domain group with language impairment showed loss in the left anterior inferior temporal lobe. The group with attention/executive deficits showed loss in the basal forebrain and hypothalamus. No coherent patterns of loss were observed in the other subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: The pattern of atrophy in the amnestic MCI groups is consistent with the concept that MCI in most of these subjects represents prodromal AD. However, the varying patterns in the language and attention/executive subgroups suggest that these subjects may have a different underlying disorder.
Authors: Heiko Braak; Kelly Del Tredici; Udo Rüb; Rob A I de Vos; Ernst N H Jansen Steur; Eva Braak Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2003 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Geraldo F Busatto; Griselda E J Garrido; Osvaldo P Almeida; Claudio C Castro; Cândida H P Camargo; Carla G Cid; Carlos A Buchpiguel; Sergio Furuie; Cassio M Bottino Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2003 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Sandra Bell-McGinty; Oscar L Lopez; Carolyn Cidis Meltzer; Joelle M Scanlon; Ellen M Whyte; Steven T Dekosky; James T Becker Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2005-09
Authors: D Chan; N C Fox; R I Scahill; W R Crum; J L Whitwell; G Leschziner; A M Rossor; J M Stevens; L Cipolotti; M N Rossor Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Pietro Tiraboschi; Larry A Hansen; Michael Alford; Annette Merdes; Eliezer Masliah; Leon J Thal; Jody Corey-Bloom Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2002-10
Authors: David S Karow; Linda K McEvoy; Christine Fennema-Notestine; Donald J Hagler; Robin G Jennings; James B Brewer; Carl K Hoh; Anders M Dale Journal: Radiology Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Harini Eavani; Mohamad Habes; Theodore D Satterthwaite; Yang An; Meng-Kang Hsieh; Nicolas Honnorat; Guray Erus; Jimit Doshi; Luigi Ferrucci; Lori L Beason-Held; Susan M Resnick; Christos Davatzikos Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2018-06-15 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Kejal Kantarci; David S Knopman; Dennis W Dickson; Joseph E Parisi; Jennifer L Whitwell; Stephen D Weigand; Keith A Josephs; Bradley F Boeve; Ronald C Petersen; Clifford R Jack Journal: Radiology Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 11.105