BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this work was to study the validity of MR angiography (MRA) for identification of spinal arteriovenous (AV) abnormalities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-four consecutive patients with suspicion of spinal vascular abnormalities underwent digital subtraction angiography (DSA) after MRA. The level and side of the suspected spinal dural arteriovenous fistula (SDAVF) and the feeding arteries in spinal arteriovenous malformations (SAVMs) were determined from the MRA and compared with DSA. RESULTS: DSA revealed SDAVF in 20 abnormalities of which 19 were spinal and 1 was tentorial with spinal drainage, as well as SAVM in 11 patients. In 3 patients, MRA and DSA were both normal. For detection of spinal arteriovenous abnormalities, neither false-positive nor false-negative MRA results were obtained. The MRA-derived level of the feeding artery in SDAVF agreed with DSA in 14 of 19 cases. In 5 cases, a mismatch of 1 vertebral level (not side) was noted for the feeding artery. For the tentorial AVF, only the spinal drainage was depicted; the feeding artery was outside the MRA field of view. In intradural SAVM, the main feeding artery was identified by MRA in 10 of 11 patients. MRA could differentiate between glomerular and fistulous SAVM in 4 of 6 cases and between sacral SDAVF and filum terminale SAVM in 2 of 5 cases. CONCLUSIONS: MRA reliably detects or excludes various types of spinal AV abnormalities and localizes the (predominant) arterial feeder of most spinal AV shunts. Although classification of the subtype of SAVMs remains difficult, with MRA it greatly helps to focus subsequent DSA.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this work was to study the validity of MR angiography (MRA) for identification of spinal arteriovenous (AV) abnormalities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-four consecutive patients with suspicion of spinal vascular abnormalities underwent digital subtraction angiography (DSA) after MRA. The level and side of the suspected spinal dural arteriovenous fistula (SDAVF) and the feeding arteries in spinal arteriovenous malformations (SAVMs) were determined from the MRA and compared with DSA. RESULTS: DSA revealed SDAVF in 20 abnormalities of which 19 were spinal and 1 was tentorial with spinal drainage, as well as SAVM in 11 patients. In 3 patients, MRA and DSA were both normal. For detection of spinal arteriovenous abnormalities, neither false-positive nor false-negative MRA results were obtained. The MRA-derived level of the feeding artery in SDAVF agreed with DSA in 14 of 19 cases. In 5 cases, a mismatch of 1 vertebral level (not side) was noted for the feeding artery. For the tentorial AVF, only the spinal drainage was depicted; the feeding artery was outside the MRA field of view. In intradural SAVM, the main feeding artery was identified by MRA in 10 of 11 patients. MRA could differentiate between glomerular and fistulous SAVM in 4 of 6 cases and between sacral SDAVF and filum terminale SAVM in 2 of 5 cases. CONCLUSIONS: MRA reliably detects or excludes various types of spinal AV abnormalities and localizes the (predominant) arterial feeder of most spinal AV shunts. Although classification of the subtype of SAVMs remains difficult, with MRA it greatly helps to focus subsequent DSA.
Authors: Robbert J Nijenhuis; Suzanne Gerretsen; Tim Leiner; Michael J Jacobs; Jos M A van Engelshoven; Walter H Backes Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Richard I Farb; Jae K Kim; Robert A Willinsky; Walter J Montanera; Karel terBrugge; J Andrew Derbyshire; J Marc C van Dijk; Graham A Wright Journal: Radiology Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: M Mascalchi; N Quilici; G Ferrito; S Mangiafico; F Scazzeri; P Torselli; P Petruzzi; M Cosottini; C Tessa; C Bartolozzi Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 1997-02 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Robbert J Nijenhuis; Tim Leiner; Erwin M J Cornips; Jan T Wilmink; Michael J Jacobs; Jos M A van Engelshoven; Walter H Backes Journal: Radiology Date: 2004-09-09 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: G Forbes; D A Nichols; C R Jack; D M Ilstrup; D B Kispert; D G Piepgras; D O Wiebers; F Earnest; P L Axley Journal: Radiology Date: 1988-11 Impact factor: 11.105