Literature DB >> 17698163

Solving da Vinci stereopsis with depth-edge-selective V2 cells.

Andrew Assee1, Ning Qian.   

Abstract

We propose a new model for da Vinci stereopsis based on a coarse-to-fine disparity energy computation in V1 and disparity-boundary-selective units in V2. Unlike previous work, our model contains only binocular cells, relies on distributed representations of disparity, and has a simple V1-to-V2 feedforward structure. We demonstrate with random-dot stereograms that the V2 stage of our model is able to determine the location and the eye-of-origin of monocularly occluded regions, and improve disparity map computation. We also examine a few related issues. First, we argue that since monocular regions are binocularly defined, they cannot generally be detected by monocular cells. Second, we show that our coarse-to-fine V1 model for conventional stereopsis explains double matching in Panum's limiting case. This provides computational support to the notion that the perceived depth of a monocular bar next to a binocular rectangle may not be da Vinci stereopsis per se [Gillam, B., Cook, M., & Blackburn, S. (2003). Monocular discs in the occlusion zones of binocular surfaces do not have quantitative depth--a comparison with Panum's limiting case. Perception 32, 1009-1019.]. Third, we demonstrate that some stimuli previously deemed invalid have simple, valid geometric interpretations. Our work suggests that studies of da Vinci stereopsis should focus on stimuli more general than the bar-and-rectangle type and that disparity-boundary-selective V2 cells may provide a simple physiological mechanism for da Vinci stereopsis.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17698163      PMCID: PMC2086864          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  37 in total

1.  Representation of stereoscopic edges in monkey visual cortex.

Authors:  R von der Heydt; H Zhou; H S Friedman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Binocular depth perception from unpaired image points need not depend on scene organization.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Tsai; Jonathan D Victor
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Stereoscopic depth discrimination in the visual cortex: neurons ideally suited as disparity detectors.

Authors:  I Ohzawa; G C DeAngelis; R D Freeman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-08-31       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Cortical computation of stereo disparity.

Authors:  N P McLoughlin; S Grossberg
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Physiological computation of binocular disparity.

Authors:  N Qian; Y Zhu
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Binocular matching of dissimilar features in phantom stereopsis.

Authors:  L Liu; S B Stevenson; C M Schor
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  A computational theory of human stereo vision.

Authors:  D Marr; T Poggio
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1979-05-23

8.  The role of monocular regions in stereoscopic displays.

Authors:  B Gillam; E Borsting
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  Stereoscopic mechanisms in monkey visual cortex: binocular correlation and disparity selectivity.

Authors:  G F Poggio; F Gonzalez; F Krause
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Depth from binocular rivalry without spatial disparity.

Authors:  I P Howard
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.490

View more
  7 in total

1.  Solving stereo transparency with an extended coarse-to-fine disparity energy model.

Authors:  Zhe Li; Ning Qian
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 2.026

Review 2.  Binocular vision.

Authors:  Randolph Blake; Hugh Wilson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Synchronized audio-visual transients drive efficient visual search for motion-in-depth.

Authors:  Marina Zannoli; John Cass; Pascal Mamassian; David Alais
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Unmixing binocular signals.

Authors:  Sidney R Lehky
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  First- and second-order contributions to depth perception in anti-correlated random dot stereograms.

Authors:  Jordi M Asher; Paul B Hibbard
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Impairment of cyclopean surface processing by disparity-defined masking stimuli.

Authors:  Ross Goutcher; Paul B Hibbard
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Natural statistics of depth edges modulate perceptual stability.

Authors:  Zeynep Basgöze; David N White; Johannes Burge; Emily A Cooper
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 2.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.