Literature DB >> 17697892

Intravital imaging and cell invasion.

Milan Makale1.   

Abstract

The main cause of cancer treatment failure is the invasion of normal tissues by cancer cells that have migrated from a primary tumor. An important obstacle to understanding cancer invasion has been the inability to acquire detailed, direct observations of the process over time in a living system. Intravital imaging, and the rodent dorsal skinfold window chamber in particular, were developed several decades ago to address this need. However, it is just recently, with the advent of sophisticated new imaging systems such as confocal and multiphoton microscopy together with the development of a wide range of fluorescent cellular and intracellular markers, that intravital methods and the window chamber have acquired powerful new potential for the study of cancer cell invasion. Moreover, the interaction of various cell signaling pathways with the integrin class of cell surface receptors has increasingly been shown to play a key role in cancer invasion. The window chamber in combination with integrin-knockout rodent models, integrin-deficient tumor cell lines, and integrin antagonists, allows real-time observation of integrin-mediated cancer invasion and angiogenesis. The present review outlines the history, uses, and recent methods of the rodent dorsal skinfold window chamber. The introduction of labeled tumor cells into the chamber is described, and imaging of tumors and angiogenic vessels within chambers using standard brightfield, confocal, and multiphoton microscopy is discussed in detail, along with the presentation of sample images.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17697892     DOI: 10.1016/S0076-6879(07)26016-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Enzymol        ISSN: 0076-6879            Impact factor:   1.600


  18 in total

1.  Quantitative in vivo imaging of the effects of inhibiting integrin signaling via Src and FAK on cancer cell movement: effects on E-cadherin dynamics.

Authors:  Marta Canel; Alan Serrels; Derek Miller; Paul Timpson; Bryan Serrels; Margaret C Frame; Valerie G Brunton
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Magnetic resonance and fluorescence imaging of doxorubicin-loaded nanoparticles using a novel in vivo model.

Authors:  Ahmet Erten; Wolf Wrasidlo; Miriam Scadeng; Sadik Esener; Robert M Hoffman; Michael Bouvet; Milan Makale
Journal:  Nanomedicine       Date:  2010-07-03       Impact factor: 5.307

3.  Analysis of mitosis and antimitotic drug responses in tumors by in vivo microscopy and single-cell pharmacodynamics.

Authors:  James D Orth; Rainer H Kohler; Floris Foijer; Peter K Sorger; Ralph Weissleder; Timothy J Mitchison
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 4.  Intravital microscopy as a tool to study drug delivery in preclinical studies.

Authors:  Panomwat Amornphimoltham; Andrius Masedunskas; Roberto Weigert
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 15.470

5.  Imaging therapeutic PARP inhibition in vivo through bioorthogonally developed companion imaging agents.

Authors:  Thomas Reiner; Jessica Lacy; Edmund J Keliher; Katherine S Yang; Adeeti Ullal; Rainer H Kohler; Claudio Vinegoni; Ralph Weissleder
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 5.715

6.  Intravital microscopy in the mouse dorsal chamber model for the study of solid tumors.

Authors:  Véronique T Baron; John Welsh; Parisa Abedinpour; Per Borgström
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 6.166

Review 7.  Designing multifunctional quantum dots for bioimaging, detection, and drug delivery.

Authors:  Pavel Zrazhevskiy; Mark Sena; Xiaohu Gao
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 54.564

8.  Percutaneous window chamber method for chronic intravital microscopy of sensor-tissue interactions.

Authors:  Heidi E Koschwanez; Bruce Klitzman; W Monty Reichert
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-11

Review 9.  The actin cytoskeleton in cancer cell motility.

Authors:  Michael F Olson; Erik Sahai
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 5.150

10.  Intravital microscopy evaluation of angiogenesis and its effects on glucose sensor performance.

Authors:  H E Koschwanez; W M Reichert; B Klitzman
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 4.396

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.