M Buti1, M A Casado, R Esteban. 1. Department of Hepatology, Hospital Vall d'Hebrón, and CiBER de Enfermedades Hepaticas y Digestivas del Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Barcelona, Spain. mbuti@vhebron.net
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is a tendency to individualize treatment in chronic hepatitis C patients depending on viral load and rapid clearance of HCV-RNA. AIM: To evaluate the cost (euro, 2006) per sustained virologic response in naïve patients with therapy à la carte compared with standard combination therapy. METHODS: A decision analysis model was used to compare standard therapy with peginterferon alpha and ribavirin for 24 weeks for genotype (G) 2/3, and 48 weeks for G1 and therapy à la carte with the same drugs but different durations: G1 high viral load for 48 weeks, G1 low viral load with rapid virologic response for 24 weeks, and without rapid virologic response for 48 weeks, and G2/3 with rapid virologic response for 12 weeks, and without rapid virologic response for 24 weeks. RESULTS: Sustained virologic response was similar in both strategies. The cost per successfully treated patient for standard therapy is 17,812 euros and for therapy à la carte 12,313 euros. Assuming that 13,309 patients with standard therapy and 14,450 patients with therapy à la carte achieve sustained virologic response, therapy à la carte has an overall cost-saving of 59.13 million euros. CONCLUSION: Therapy à la carte is a cost-saving strategy for chronic hepatitis C infection compared to standard therapy, with lower investment requirement per patient to achieve sustained virologic response.
BACKGROUND: There is a tendency to individualize treatment in chronic hepatitis Cpatients depending on viral load and rapid clearance of HCV-RNA. AIM: To evaluate the cost (euro, 2006) per sustained virologic response in naïve patients with therapy à la carte compared with standard combination therapy. METHODS: A decision analysis model was used to compare standard therapy with peginterferon alpha and ribavirin for 24 weeks for genotype (G) 2/3, and 48 weeks for G1 and therapy à la carte with the same drugs but different durations: G1 high viral load for 48 weeks, G1 low viral load with rapid virologic response for 24 weeks, and without rapid virologic response for 48 weeks, and G2/3 with rapid virologic response for 12 weeks, and without rapid virologic response for 24 weeks. RESULTS: Sustained virologic response was similar in both strategies. The cost per successfully treated patient for standard therapy is 17,812 euros and for therapy à la carte 12,313 euros. Assuming that 13,309 patients with standard therapy and 14,450 patients with therapy à la carte achieve sustained virologic response, therapy à la carte has an overall cost-saving of 59.13 million euros. CONCLUSION: Therapy à la carte is a cost-saving strategy for chronic hepatitis C infection compared to standard therapy, with lower investment requirement per patient to achieve sustained virologic response.
Authors: Juan Oliva-Moreno; Luz M Peña-Longobardo; Sonia Alonso; Antonio Fernández-Bolaños; María Luisa Gutiérrez; Álvaro Hidalgo-Vega; Elsa de la Fuente; Conrado M Fernández-Rodríguez Journal: Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 2.566