OBJECTIVE: To describe the implementation of a cost-sharing system for emergency obstetric care in an urban health district of Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso and analyse its results after 1 year of activity. METHODS: Service availability and use, service quality, knowledge of the cost-sharing system in the community and financial viability of the system were measured before and after the system was implemented. Different sources of data were used: community survey, anthropological study, routine data from hospital files and registers and specific data collected on major obstetric interventions (MOI) in all the hospitals utilized by the district population. Direct costs of MOI were collected for each patient through an individual form and monitored during the year 2005. Rates of MOI for absolute maternal indications (AMI) were calculated for the period 2003-2005. RESULTS: The direct cost of a MOI was on average 136US$, including referral cost. Through the cost-sharing system this amount was shared between families (46US$), health centres (15US$), Ministry of Health (38US$) and local authority (37US$). The scheme was started in January 2005. The rate of cost recovery was 91.3% and the balance at the end of 2005 was slightly positive (4.7% of the total contribution). The number of emergency referrals by health centres increased from 84 in 2004 to 683 in 2005. MOI per 100 expected births increased from 1.95% in 2003 to 3.56% in 2005 and MOI for AMI increased from 0.75% to 1.42%. CONCLUSIONS: The dramatic increase in MOI suggests that the cost-sharing scheme decreased financial and geographical barriers to emergency obstetric care. Other positive effects on quality of care were documented but the sustainability of such a system remains uncertain in the dynamic context of Burkina Faso (decentralization).
OBJECTIVE: To describe the implementation of a cost-sharing system for emergency obstetric care in an urban health district of Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso and analyse its results after 1 year of activity. METHODS: Service availability and use, service quality, knowledge of the cost-sharing system in the community and financial viability of the system were measured before and after the system was implemented. Different sources of data were used: community survey, anthropological study, routine data from hospital files and registers and specific data collected on major obstetric interventions (MOI) in all the hospitals utilized by the district population. Direct costs of MOI were collected for each patient through an individual form and monitored during the year 2005. Rates of MOI for absolute maternal indications (AMI) were calculated for the period 2003-2005. RESULTS: The direct cost of a MOI was on average 136US$, including referral cost. Through the cost-sharing system this amount was shared between families (46US$), health centres (15US$), Ministry of Health (38US$) and local authority (37US$). The scheme was started in January 2005. The rate of cost recovery was 91.3% and the balance at the end of 2005 was slightly positive (4.7% of the total contribution). The number of emergency referrals by health centres increased from 84 in 2004 to 683 in 2005. MOI per 100 expected births increased from 1.95% in 2003 to 3.56% in 2005 and MOI for AMI increased from 0.75% to 1.42%. CONCLUSIONS: The dramatic increase in MOI suggests that the cost-sharing scheme decreased financial and geographical barriers to emergency obstetric care. Other positive effects on quality of care were documented but the sustainability of such a system remains uncertain in the dynamic context of Burkina Faso (decentralization).
Authors: Jacob Mazalale; Christabel Kambala; Stephan Brenner; Jobiba Chinkhumba; Julia Lohmann; Don P Mathanga; Bjarne Robberstad; Adamson S Muula; Manuela De Allegri Journal: Trop Med Int Health Date: 2015-03-02 Impact factor: 2.622
Authors: Nicholas Risko; Amit Chandra; Taylor W Burkholder; Lee A Wallis; Teri Reynolds; Emilie J Calvello Hynes; Junaid Razzak Journal: BMJ Glob Health Date: 2019-07-29