Literature DB >> 17696695

Scope of linguistic influence: does a classifier system alter object concepts?

Henrik Saalbach1, Mutsumi Imai.   

Abstract

Whether and to what extent conceptual structure is universal is of great importance for understanding the nature of human concepts. Two major factors that might affect concepts are language and culture. The authors investigated whether these 2 factors affect concepts of everyday objects in any significant ways. Specifically, they tested (a) whether the system of grammatical categorization by classifiers influenced the conceptual structure of speakers of classifier languages, and (b) whether Westerners organized object concepts around taxonomic relations whereas Easterners organized them around thematic relations, as proposed by R. E. Nisbett (2003). The relative importance of 3 types of relations--taxonomic, thematic, and classifier--for Chinese and German speakers was tested using a range of tasks, including categorization, similarity judgment, property induction, and fast-speed word-picture matching. Some support for linguistic relativity as well as for the cultural-specific cognition proposal was found in some tasks, but these effects were miniscule compared with the importance of taxonomic and thematic relations for both language-culture groups. The authors conclude that the global structure of everyday object concepts is strikingly similar across different cultures and languages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17696695     DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.136.3.485

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  9 in total

1.  The Influence of Sex Information on Gender Word Processing.

Authors:  Alba Casado; Alfonso Palma; Daniela Paolieri
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2018-06

2.  Differential sensitivity to the gender of a person by English and Chinese speakers.

Authors:  Jenn-Yeu Chen; Jui-Ju Su
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2011-06

3.  Are chinese and german children taxonomic, thematic, or shape biased? Influence of classifiers and cultural contexts.

Authors:  Mutsumi Imai; Henrik Saalbach; Elsbeth Stern
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-12-08

4.  Grounding grammatical categories: attention bias in hand space influences grammatical congruency judgment of Chinese nominal classifiers.

Authors:  Marit Lobben; Stefania D'Ascenzo
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-27

5.  Compound words prompt arbitrary semantic associations in conceptual memory.

Authors:  Bastien Boutonnet; Rhonda McClain; Guillaume Thierry
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-03-14

6.  Categorization Method Affects the Typicality Effect: ERP Evidence from a Category-Inference Task.

Authors:  Xiaoxi Wang; Yun Tao; Tobias Tempel; Yuan Xu; Siqi Li; Yu Tian; Hong Li
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-02-17

7.  How Early is Infants' Attention to Objects and Actions Shaped by Culture? New Evidence from 24-Month-Olds Raised in the US and China.

Authors:  Sandra R Waxman; Xiaolan Fu; Brock Ferguson; Kathleen Geraghty; Erin Leddon; Jing Liang; Min-Fang Zhao
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-02-05

8.  Investigating Heritage Language Processing: Meaning Composition in Chinese Classifier-Noun Phrasal Contexts.

Authors:  Fei Li; Xiangfei Hong; Zhaoying He; Sixuan Wu; Chenyi Zhang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-12-17

9.  One Label or Two? Linguistic Influences on the Similarity Judgment of Objects between English and Japanese Speakers.

Authors:  Takahiko Masuda; Keiko Ishii; Koji Miwa; Marghalara Rashid; Hajin Lee; Rania Mahdi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-09-26
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.