AIM: To compare the antiviral efficacy of adefovir (ADV) in lamivudine (LMV)-resistant patients with LMV treatment in nucleoside-naive patients, using serum samples collected sequentially during the course of treatment progressing from LMV to ADV. METHODS: Forty-four patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) were included. The patients were initially treated with LMV and then switched to ADV when LMV resistance developed. Antiviral efficacy was assessed by measuring the following: reduction in serum HBV DNA from baseline, HBV DNA negative conversion (defined as HBV DNA being undectable by the hybridization assay), and HBV DNA response (either HBV DNA level <or= 10(5) copies/mL or a >or= 2 log10 reduction from baseline HBV DNA level). RESULTS: After two and six months of treatment, HBV DNA reduction was greater with LMV compared to ADV treatment (P = 0.021). HBV DNA negative conversion rates were 64% and 27% after one month of LMV and ADV treatment respectively (P = 0.001). Similarly, HBV DNA response rates were 74% and 51% after two months of LMV and ADV treatment respectively (P = 0.026). The time taken to HBV DNA negative conversion and to HBV DNA response were both delayed in ADV treatment compared with LMV. CONCLUSION: The antiviral efficacy of ADV in LMV-resistant patients is slower and less potent than that with LMV in nucleoside-naive patients during the early course of treatment.
AIM: To compare the antiviral efficacy of adefovir (ADV) in lamivudine (LMV)-resistant patients with LMV treatment in nucleoside-naive patients, using serum samples collected sequentially during the course of treatment progressing from LMV to ADV. METHODS: Forty-four patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) were included. The patients were initially treated with LMV and then switched to ADV when LMV resistance developed. Antiviral efficacy was assessed by measuring the following: reduction in serum HBV DNA from baseline, HBV DNA negative conversion (defined as HBV DNA being undectable by the hybridization assay), and HBV DNA response (either HBV DNA level <or= 10(5) copies/mL or a >or= 2 log10 reduction from baseline HBV DNA level). RESULTS: After two and six months of treatment, HBV DNA reduction was greater with LMV compared to ADV treatment (P = 0.021). HBV DNA negative conversion rates were 64% and 27% after one month of LMV and ADV treatment respectively (P = 0.001). Similarly, HBV DNA response rates were 74% and 51% after two months of LMV and ADV treatment respectively (P = 0.026). The time taken to HBV DNA negative conversion and to HBV DNA response were both delayed in ADV treatment compared with LMV. CONCLUSION: The antiviral efficacy of ADV in LMV-resistant patients is slower and less potent than that with LMV in nucleoside-naive patients during the early course of treatment.
Authors: C L Lai; R N Chien; N W Leung; T T Chang; R Guan; D I Tai; K Y Ng; P C Wu; J C Dent; J Barber; S L Stephenson; D F Gray Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1998-07-09 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Eugene R Schiff; Ching-Lung Lai; Stefanos Hadziyannis; Peter Neuhaus; Norah Terrault; Massimo Colombo; Hans L Tillmann; Didier Samuel; Stefan Zeuzem; Leslie Lilly; Maria Rendina; Jean-Pierre Villeneuve; Nicole Lama; Craig James; Michael S Wulfsohn; Hamid Namini; Christopher Westland; Shelly Xiong; Gavin S Choy; Sally Van Doren; John Fry; Carol L Brosgart Journal: Hepatology Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Dong Hyun Kim; Jong Won Choi; Jeong Hun Seo; Yong Suk Cho; Sun Young Won; Byung Kyu Park; Han Ho Jeon; Sang Yun Shin; Chun Kyon Lee Journal: Yonsei Med J Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 2.759