Literature DB >> 17695915

Seasonal and regional variations of primary and secondary organic aerosols over the continental United States: semi-empirical estimates and model evaluation.

Shaocai Yu1, Prakash V Bhave, Robin L Dennis, Rohit Mathur.   

Abstract

Seasonal and regional variations of primary (OC(pri)) and secondary (OC(sec)) organic carbon aerosols across the continental United States for the year 2001 were examined by a semi-empirical technique using observed OC and elemental carbon (EC) data from 142 routine monitoring sites in mostly rural locations across the country, coupled with the primary OC/EC ratios, obtained from a chemical transport model (i.e., Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model). This application yields the first non-mechanistic estimates of the spatial and temporal variations in OC(pri) and OC(sec) over an entire year on a continental scale. There is significant seasonal and regional variability in the relative contributions of OC(pri) and OC(sec) to OC. Over the continental United States, the median OC(sec) concentrations are 0.13, 0.36, 0.63, 0.44, and 0.42 mictrog C m(-3) in winter (DJF), spring (MAM), summer (JJA), fall (SON), and annual, respectively, making 21, 44, 51, 42, and 43% contributions to OC, respectively. OC(pri) exceeds OC(sec) in all seasons except summer. Regional analysis shows that the southeastern region has the highest concentration of OC(pri) (annual median = 1.35 microg C m(-3)), whereas the central region has the highest concentration of OC(sec) (annual median = 0.76 microg C m(-3)). The mechanistic OC(sec) estimates from the CMAQ model were compared against the independently derived semi-empirical OC(sec) estimates. The results indicate that the mechanistic model reproduced the monthly medians of the semi-empirical OC(sec) estimates well over the northeast, southeast, midwest, and central regions in all months except the summer months (June, July, and August), during which the modeled regional monthly medians were consistently lower than the semi-empirical estimates. This indicates that the CMAQ model is missing OC(sec) formation pathways that are important in the summer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17695915     DOI: 10.1021/es061535g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  6 in total

1.  Nonequilibrium atmospheric secondary organic aerosol formation and growth.

Authors:  Véronique Perraud; Emily A Bruns; Michael J Ezell; Stanley N Johnson; Yong Yu; M Lizabeth Alexander; Alla Zelenyuk; Dan Imre; Wayne L Chang; Donald Dabdub; James F Pankow; Barbara J Finlayson-Pitts
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Contribution of isoprene-derived organosulfates to free tropospheric aerosol mass.

Authors:  K D Froyd; S M Murphy; D M Murphy; J A de Gouw; N C Eddingsaas; P O Wennberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Attribution of the United States "warming hole": aerosol indirect effect and precipitable water vapor.

Authors:  Shaocai Yu; Kiran Alapaty; Rohit Mathur; Jonathan Pleim; Yuanhang Zhang; Chris Nolte; Brian Eder; Kristen Foley; Tatsuya Nagashima
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Effects of diesel engine exhaust origin secondary organic aerosols on novel object recognition ability and maternal behavior in BALB/c mice.

Authors:  Tin-Tin Win-Shwe; Yuji Fujitani; Chaw Kyi-Tha-Thu; Akiko Furuyama; Takehiro Michikawa; Shinji Tsukahara; Hiroshi Nitta; Seishiro Hirano
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Public health impacts of secondary particulate formation from aromatic hydrocarbons in gasoline.

Authors:  Katherine von Stackelberg; Jonathan Buonocore; Prakash V Bhave; Joel A Schwartz
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 5.984

6.  On the implications of aerosol liquid water and phase separation for organic aerosol mass.

Authors:  Havala O T Pye; Benjamin N Murphy; Lu Xu; Nga L Ng; Annmarie G Carlton; Hongyu Guo; Rodney Weber; Petros Vasilakos; K Wyat Appel; Sri Hapsari Budisulistiorini; Jason D Surratt; Athanasios Nenes; Weiwei Hu; Jose L Jimenez; Gabriel Isaacman-VanWertz; Pawel K Misztal; Allen H Goldstein
Journal:  Atmos Chem Phys       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 6.133

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.