Literature DB >> 17695607

Surface geometry of four nanofiller and one hybrid composite after one-step and multiple-step polishing.

Martin Jung1, Katja Eichelberger, Joachim Klimek.   

Abstract

This study assessed the surface quality of four nanoparticle composites and one hybrid composite after polishing with three different techniques. Nanocomposites Premise (KerrHawe), Tetric EvoCeram (Ivoclar Vivadent), Filtek Supreme (3M ESPE) and Ceram X Duo (Dentsply) and the hybrid composite Herculite XRV (KerrHawe) were selected. Sixty specimens 7x7 mm each were fabricated from these materials. After light curing, the specimens were treated with 600 grit sandpaper discs. Fifteen specimens of each composite were polished using flexible Sof-Lex discs (3M ESPE). The remaining 45 specimens of each material were prepared with three finishing protocols: a single 30 microm diamond (n=15), a sequence of a 30 microm and a 20 microm diamond (n=15) and a 30 microm diamond followed by a tungsten carbide finishing bur (n=15). Each series of 15 specimens was then subdivided into three groups of five and polished with the Astropol system (Ivoclar Vivadent), OptiShine brushes (KerrHawe) and the Enhance/PoGo system (Dentsply). Quantitative evaluation of surface roughness was done with the help of optical laser stylus profilometry. Average roughness (Ra) was calculated, and the effect of the materials, the finishing regimen and the polishing methods on surface roughness were analyzed by three-way and two-way Anova and Scheffé post-hoc tests. Qualitative evaluation of the surfaces was done with the help of scanning electron microscopy (PSEM 500, Phlipps). Photomicrographs were assessed with respect to surface quality in four gradings. Surface roughness after polishing was significantly influenced by three factors: composite material (p < 0.001), finishing protocol (p < 0.001) and polishing method (p < 0.001). There were strong interactions between the finishing and polishing methods (p < 0.001). Two of the nanocomposites were significantly smoother (p < or = 0.001), while the other two had a surface quality similar to that of a hybrid composite. Astropol achieved the lowest average roughness on all composites. Except for a combination of a 30 microm diamond and OptiShine brushes, which caused severe roughness, all the polishing methods produced surfaces that were significantly smoother than using the Sof-Lex discs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17695607     DOI: 10.2341/06-101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Dent        ISSN: 0361-7734            Impact factor:   2.440


  16 in total

1.  Effect of Various Finishing Procedures on the Reflectivity (Shine) of Tooth Enamel - An In-vitro Study.

Authors:  Harshal Ashok Patil; Shrikant Shrinivas Chitko; Veerendra Virupaxappa Kerudi; Amit Ratanlal Maheshwari; Neeraj Suresh Patil; Pawankumar Dnyandeo Tekale; Ketan Ashorao Gore; Amit Ashok Zope
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-08-01

2.  Effect of the polishing procedures on color stability and surface roughness of composite resins.

Authors:  Vera Lucia Schmitt; Regina Maria Puppin-Rontani; Fabiana Scarparo Naufel; Flávia Pardo Salata Nahsan; Mário Alexandre Coelho Sinhoreti; Wagner Baseggio
Journal:  ISRN Dent       Date:  2011-07-11

3.  The influence of finishing/polishing time and cooling system on surface roughness and microhardness of two different types of composite resin restorations.

Authors:  Raja Rajeswari Kaminedi; Narendra Varma Penumatsa; Tulasi Priya; Kusai Baroudi
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2014-12

4.  The effects of irradiance and exposure time on the surface roughness of bulk-fill composite resin restorative materials.

Authors:  Fahad I Alkhudhairy
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.484

5.  Use of "Surface Analyzer" to evaluate the Effect of Two Polishing Systems on Surface Texture of Four Newer Composites.

Authors:  Shefally Garg; Munish Goel; Shweta Verma; Nanika Mahajan; Bhawna Kaul; Vikas Garg
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2018-08-01

6.  Current practicality of nanotechnology in dentistry. Part 1: Focus on nanocomposite restoratives and biomimetics.

Authors:  Scott A Saunders
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2009-11-30

7.  The effect of prophylactic polishing pastes on surface roughness of indirect restorative materials.

Authors:  Esra Can Say; Haktan Yurdagüven; Özlem Malkondu; Nimet Ünlü; Mübin Soyman; Ender Kazazoğlu
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-03-03

8.  In vitro evaluation of the effect of two finishing and polishing systems on four esthetic restorative materials.

Authors:  Rochna Rai; Ruchi Gupta
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2013-11

9.  Surface geometry of various nanofiller composites using different polishing systems: A comparative study.

Authors:  Vipul Sapra; Sonali Taneja; Mohit Kumar
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2013-11

10.  Comparison of finishing and polishing systems for residual resin removal after debonding.

Authors:  Caöry Ulusoy
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.698

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.