Literature DB >> 17695593

Prevalence of resistance to 11 antimicrobials among Campylobacter coill isolated from pigs on 80 grower-finisher farms in Ontario.

Norma P Varela1, Robert Friendship, Cate Dewey.   

Abstract

We carried out a cross-sectional study to investigate antimicrobial resistance patterns of Campylobacter coli isolated from Ontario grower-finisher pigs. From January to June 2004, 1200 samples were collected from 80 farms by obtaining a constant number (15) of fecal samples per farm. Susceptibility of the isolates to 11 antimicrobial drugs was determined by the agar-dilution technique. The overall prevalence of resistance to 1 or more antimicrobials among the isolates was 99.2%. High levels of resistance were observed for azithromycin, clindamycin, erythromycin, streptomycin, and tetracycline: 91.7%, 82.5%, 81.4%, 70.7%, and 63.7%, respectively. For sulfamethoxazole, ampicillin, and nalidixic acid, resistance was observed in 40.3%, 26.6%, and 22.7% of the isolates, respectively. Although at very low levels, resistance was observed for ciprofloxacin (a fluoroquinolone), chloramphenicol, and gentamicin: in 2.4%, 1.7%, and 0.2%, respectively. Many of the isolates (29.7%) were resistant to 5 antimicrobials, the most common being azithromycin, clindamycin, erythromycin, streptomycin, and tetracycline. Isolates from the same farm showed at least 5 patterns of resistance. Results from this study indicate high levels of resistance to the antimicrobial drugs most commonly used in the Canadian swine industry (macrolides, lincosamides, and tetracyclines) among C. coli isolated from grower-finisher pigs in Ontario. Macrolides and fluoroquinolones are the drugs most commonly used to treat severe human campylobacteriosis. Fortunately, at present, there is little resistance to fluoroquinolones among C. coli from pigs in Ontario.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17695593      PMCID: PMC1899864     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Vet Res        ISSN: 0830-9000            Impact factor:   1.310


  18 in total

1.  Effect of abolishment of the use of antimicrobial agents for growth promotion on occurrence of antimicrobial resistance in fecal enterococci from food animals in Denmark.

Authors:  F M Aarestrup; A M Seyfarth; H D Emborg; K Pedersen; R S Hendriksen; F Bager
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Improved toluidine blue-DNA agar for detection of DNA hydrolysis by campylobacters.

Authors:  H Lior; A Patel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Campylobacter spp antibiotic susceptibility.

Authors:  F Navarro; E Miró; B Mirelis; G Prats
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 4.  Inactivation of antibiotics and the dissemination of resistance genes.

Authors:  J Davies
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-04-15       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of thermophilic Campylobacter spp. from humans, pigs, cattle, and broilers in Denmark.

Authors:  F M Aarestrup; E M Nielsen; M Madsen; J Engberg
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  Quinolone resistance and Campylobacter spp.

Authors:  L J Piddock
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 5.790

7.  A survey of Campylobacter in animals.

Authors:  P A Manser; R W Dalziel
Journal:  J Hyg (Lond)       Date:  1985-08

8.  Emergence of fluoroquinolone resistance in the native Campylobacter coli population of pigs exposed to enrofloxacin.

Authors:  Anne A Delsol; Julie Sunderland; Martin J Woodward; Lillian Pumbwe; Laura J V Piddock; John M Roe
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2004-03-17       Impact factor: 5.790

9.  New, extended biotyping scheme for Campylobacter jejuni, Campylobacter coli, and "Campylobacter laridis".

Authors:  H Lior
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter strains, United States, 1997-2001.

Authors:  Amita Gupta; Jennifer M Nelson; Timothy J Barrett; Robert V Tauxe; Shannon P Rossiter; Cindy R Friedman; Kevin W Joyce; Kirk E Smith; Timothy F Jones; Marguerite A Hawkins; Belershacew Shiferaw; James L Beebe; Duc J Vugia; Terry Rabatsky-Ehr; James A Benson; Timothy P Root; Frederick J Angulo
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  5 in total

1.  Longitudinal study of the persistence of antimicrobial-resistant campylobacter strains in distinct Swine production systems on farms, at slaughter, and in the environment.

Authors:  Macarena P Quintana-Hayashi; Siddhartha Thakur
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Comparison of agar dilution and E-test for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Campylobacter coil isolates recovered from 80 Ontario swine farms.

Authors:  Norma P Varela; Robert Friendship; Cate Dewey; Alfonso Valdivieso
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.310

3.  Identification of a novel genomic island conferring resistance to multiple aminoglycoside antibiotics in Campylobacter coli.

Authors:  Shangshang Qin; Yang Wang; Qijing Zhang; Xia Chen; Zhangqi Shen; Fengru Deng; Congming Wu; Jianzhong Shen
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Prevalence, antibiogram and risk factors of thermophilic Campylobacter spp. in dressed porcine carcass of Chitwan, Nepal.

Authors:  Laxman Ghimire; Dinesh Kumar Singh; Hom Bahadur Basnet; Rebanta Kumar Bhattarai; Santosh Dhakal; Bishwas Sharma
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2014-04-05       Impact factor: 3.605

Review 5.  Prevalence and risk factors for bacterial food-borne zoonotic hazards in slaughter pigs: a review.

Authors:  J Fosse; H Seegers; C Magras
Journal:  Zoonoses Public Health       Date:  2009-01-17       Impact factor: 2.702

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.