| Literature DB >> 17695562 |
Elizabeth J Lindley1, Jean Yves De Vos, Ian Morgan, Gareth Murcutt, Nic Hoenich, Hans Polaschegg, Andy Johnson, John Daugirdas, Andreas Wüpper, Richard Ward, Alois Gorke, Maria Fettouhi, Elisheva Milo, Jiri Sramek, Eva-Lena Nilsson, Bertrand Belot, Merike Luman, Diane Walker, Martin Gerrish, Maurice Harrington, Veronica Francis, Kathryn Iwaasa, Martha Girak, Marianna Eleftheroudi, Joan Camarro Simard, Ivo Fridolin, Fredrik Uhlin.
Abstract
The discussion was initiated by a paper comparing the measurement of dialysis dose (Kt/V) and solute clearance using on-line ultra-violet absorbance, blood and dialysate urea and ionic dialysance by Uhlin et al (NDT 2006). Participants from 14 countries discussed the theory behind the UV absorbance technique and the potential for its use in routine practice, the correlation between Kt/V measured using different methods, the use of ionic dialysance and the optimisation of dose monitoring. The 'take-home' messages from the discussion were that UV-absorbance could help ensure the delivery of dialysis dose as it provides real time feedback on the effect interventions such as repositioning of needles. The technology is relatively inexpensive and requires no consumables but changes in the dialysis machine settings could lead to misleading measurements if not communicated to the UV monitor. Session-to-session variation in dialysis dose can be measured using on-line clearance monitoring. If it is already on the machine and costs nothing, why not use it? Alternatively, regular access recirculation checks and a record of the total blood volume processed at each session allow problems with delivered dialysis dose to be picked up between routine blood tests.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2007 PMID: 17695562 DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-6686.2007.tb00037.x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Ren Care ISSN: 1755-6678