Literature DB >> 17694947

Use of a piezoelectric surgical device to harvest bone grafts from the mandibular ramus: report of 40 cases.

Arndt Happe1.   

Abstract

Forty patients (12 men, 28 women; mean age 44.9 +/- 13.95 years) with inadequate bone volume for implant placement in either the maxilla or the mandible were scheduled for bone-grafting procedures. Bone grafts were harvested with a piezoelectric surgical device (Piezosurgery, Mectron) from 45 donor sites and grafted into recipient sites prior to implant placement. After healing of the grafted sites, 109 implants were placed. Clinical evaluations were performed to assess the size and quality of the obtained grafts, complications at the donor and recipient sites, integration of the grafts, bone quality, resorption of the grafts, and ability to properly place implants. Piezosurgery allowed precise, clean, and smooth cutting with excellent visibility. Mean graft size was 1.15 cm3 (SD 0.5), with a maximum of 2.4 cm3. The quality of the obtained grafts was mainly cortical (71%), 42 of the 45 donor sites healed uneventfully (93.33%), and 50 of the 52 grafted sites healed uneventfully (96.15%).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17694947

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent        ISSN: 0198-7569            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of the C-Reactive Protein Level and Visual Analog Scale Scores between Piezosurgery and Rotatory Osteotomy in Mandibular Impacted Third Molar Extraction.

Authors:  Lakshmi Shetty; Khushal Gangwani; Uday Londhe; Swati Bharadwaj; Mohammed Mousa H Bakri; Ahmed Alamoudi; Rodolfo Reda; Shilpa Bhandi; A Thirumal Raj; Shankargouda Patil; Luca Testarelli
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-20

2.  The use of piezosurgery as an alternative method of minimally invasive surgery in the authors' experience.

Authors:  Mansur Rahnama; Lukasz Czupkałło; Leszek Czajkowski; Joanna Grasza; Jan Wallner
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 1.195

3.  Dynamics of bone healing after osteotomy with piezosurgery or conventional drilling - histomorphometrical, immunohistochemical, and molecular analysis.

Authors:  Jônatas Caldeira Esteves; Elcio Marcantonio; Ana Paula de Souza Faloni; Fernanda Regina Godoy Rocha; Rosemary Adriana Marcantonio; Katarzyna Wilk; Giuseppe Intini
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 5.531

4.  Piezosurgery in Bone Augmentation Procedures Previous to Dental Implant Surgery: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Gabriel Leonardo Magrin; Eder Alberto Sigua-Rodriguez; Douglas Rangel Goulart; Luciana Asprino
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2015-12-22

5.  Comparison of Piezosurgery and Conventional Rotary Instruments for Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars: A Randomized Controlled Clinical and Radiographic Trial.

Authors:  Hani Arakji; Mohamed Shokry; Nayer Aboelsaad
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2016-08-14

6.  Piezosurgery Versus Conventional Method Alveoloplasty.

Authors:  Khushal D Gangwani; Lakshmi Shetty; Deepak Kulkarni; Ratnadeepika Seshagiri; Ratima Chopra
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2018 Jul-Dec

7.  A clinical comparative evaluation of periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics with piezo and surgical bur: An interdisciplinary approach.

Authors:  Supreet Kaur Thind; Anirban Chatterjee; Faisal Arshad; Paramjeet Singh Sandhu; Manpreet Singh Thind; Javeriya Nahin
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2018 Jul-Aug

8.  A Present Day Approach to Crown Lengthening - Piezosurgery.

Authors:  Vamsi Lavu; Chakravarthy Arumugam; Nivedha Venkatesan; Balaji Sk; Giri Valandhan Vedha
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-11-26
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.